Tight Regret Bounds for Bayesian Optimization in One Dimension
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/1805.11792v3
- Date: Wed, 07 May 2025 04:10:27 GMT
- Title: Tight Regret Bounds for Bayesian Optimization in One Dimension
- Authors: Jonathan Scarlett,
- Abstract summary: We consider the problem of Bayesian optimization (BO) in one dimension, under a Gaussian process prior and Gaussian sampling noise.<n>We provide a theoretical analysis showing that, under fairly mild technical assumptions on the kernel, the best possible cumulative regret up to time $T$ behaves as $Omega(sqrtT)$ and $O(sqrtTlog T)$.
- Score: 47.51554144092745
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: We consider the problem of Bayesian optimization (BO) in one dimension, under a Gaussian process prior and Gaussian sampling noise. We provide a theoretical analysis showing that, under fairly mild technical assumptions on the kernel, the best possible cumulative regret up to time $T$ behaves as $\Omega(\sqrt{T})$ and $O(\sqrt{T\log T})$. This gives a tight characterization up to a $\sqrt{\log T}$ factor, and includes the first non-trivial lower bound for noisy BO. Our assumptions are satisfied, for example, by the squared exponential and Mat\'ern-$\nu$ kernels, with the latter requiring $\nu > 2$. Our results certify the near-optimality of existing bounds (Srinivas {\em et al.}, 2009) for the SE kernel, while proving them to be strictly suboptimal for the Mat\'ern kernel with $\nu > 2$.
Related papers
- LC-Tsallis-INF: Generalized Best-of-Both-Worlds Linear Contextual Bandits [38.41164102066483]
This study considers the linear contextual bandit problem with independent and identically distributed contexts.
Our proposed algorithm is based on the Follow-The-Regularized-Leader with the Tsallis entropy and referred to as the $alpha$-textual-Con (LC)-Tsallis-INF.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-05T18:59:47Z) - Delayed Feedback in Kernel Bandits [16.11544965325835]
Black box optimisation of an unknown function is a ubiquitous problem in machine learning, academic research and industrial production.
We consider a kernel bandit problem underally delayed feedback, and propose an algorithm with $tildemathcalO(sqrtGamma_k(T)T+mathbbE[tau]Gamma_k(T))$
This represents a significant improvement over the state of the art regret bound of $tildemathcalO(Gamma_k(T)sqrtT
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-01T12:03:19Z) - Lower Bounds on the Worst-Case Complexity of Efficient Global
Optimization [11.523746174066702]
We derive a unified lower bound for the complexity of efficient global optimization in terms of the metric entropy of a ball in its corresponding reproducing kernel Hilbert space(RKHS)
We show that this lower bound nearly matches the upper bound attained by non-adaptive search algorithms for the commonly used squared exponential kernel and the Mat'ern kernel.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-20T11:57:13Z) - Order-Optimal Error Bounds for Noisy Kernel-Based Bayesian Quadrature [42.129843613950285]
We consider functions in a em Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space (RKHS) with the Mat'ern-$nu$ kernel.
We find that when the black-box queries are subject to Gaussian noise having variance $sigma2$, any algorithm making at most $T$ queries must incur a mean absolute error of $Omega(T-fracnud-1 + sigma T-frac12)$.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-22T01:49:41Z) - Gaussian Process Bandit Optimization with Few Batches [49.896920704012395]
We introduce a batch algorithm inspired by finite-arm bandit algorithms.
We show that it achieves the cumulative regret upper bound $Oast(sqrtTgamma_T)$ using $O(loglog T)$ batches within time horizon $T$.
In addition, we propose a modified version of our algorithm, and characterize how the regret is impacted by the number of batches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-15T00:54:04Z) - Bayesian Optimistic Optimisation with Exponentially Decaying Regret [58.02542541410322]
The current practical BO algorithms have regret bounds ranging from $mathcalO(fraclogNsqrtN)$ to $mathcal O(e-sqrtN)$, where $N$ is the number of evaluations.
This paper explores the possibility of improving the regret bound in the noiseless setting by intertwining concepts from BO and tree-based optimistic optimisation.
We propose the BOO algorithm, a first practical approach which can achieve an exponential regret bound with order $mathcal O(N-sqrt
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-10T13:07:44Z) - Private Stochastic Convex Optimization: Optimal Rates in $\ell_1$
Geometry [69.24618367447101]
Up to logarithmic factors the optimal excess population loss of any $(varepsilon,delta)$-differently private is $sqrtlog(d)/n + sqrtd/varepsilon n.$
We show that when the loss functions satisfy additional smoothness assumptions, the excess loss is upper bounded (up to logarithmic factors) by $sqrtlog(d)/n + (log(d)/varepsilon n)2/3.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-02T06:53:44Z) - Optimal Regret Algorithm for Pseudo-1d Bandit Convex Optimization [51.23789922123412]
We study online learning with bandit feedback (i.e. learner has access to only zeroth-order oracle) where cost/reward functions admit a "pseudo-1d" structure.
We show a lower bound of $min(sqrtdT, T3/4)$ for the regret of any algorithm, where $T$ is the number of rounds.
We propose a new algorithm sbcalg that combines randomized online gradient descent with a kernelized exponential weights method to exploit the pseudo-1d structure effectively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-15T08:16:51Z) - Streaming Complexity of SVMs [110.63976030971106]
We study the space complexity of solving the bias-regularized SVM problem in the streaming model.
We show that for both problems, for dimensions of $frac1lambdaepsilon$, one can obtain streaming algorithms with spacely smaller than $frac1lambdaepsilon$.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-07T17:10:00Z) - Tight Regret Bounds for Noisy Optimization of a Brownian Motion [118.65407541895851]
We consider the problem of Bayesian optimization of a one-dimensional Brownian motion in which the $T$ adaptively chosen observations are corrupted by Gaussian noise.
We show that as the smallest possible expected cumulative regret and the smallest possible expected simple regret scale as $Omega(sigmasqrtT cdot log T)$.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-25T14:44:53Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.