Measuring relative opinion from location-based social media: A case study of the 2016 U.S. presidential election

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2002.00854v2
• Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 23:05:01 GMT
• Title: Measuring relative opinion from location-based social media: A case study of the 2016 U.S. presidential election
• Authors: Zhaoya Gong, Tengteng Cai, Jean-Claude Thill, Scott Hale, Mark Graham
• Abstract summary: Social media has become an emerging alternative to opinion polls for public opinion collection. This paper aims to answer two questions: 1) whether quantifiable measurement of public opinion can be obtained from social media and 2) whether it can produce better or complementary measures compared to opinion polls.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Social media has become an emerging alternative to opinion polls for public opinion collection, while it is still posing many challenges as a passive data source, such as structurelessness, quantifiability, and representativeness. Social media data with geotags provide new opportunities to unveil the geographic locations of users expressing their opinions. This paper aims to answer two questions: 1) whether quantifiable measurement of public opinion can be obtained from social media and 2) whether it can produce better or complementary measures compared to opinion polls. This research proposes a novel approach to measure the relative opinion of Twitter users towards public issues in order to accommodate more complex opinion structures and take advantage of the geography pertaining to the public issues. To ensure that this new measure is technically feasible, a modeling framework is developed including building a training dataset by adopting a state-of-the-art approach and devising a new deep learning method called Opinion-Oriented Word Embedding. With a case study of the tweets selected for the 2016 U.S. presidential election, we demonstrate the predictive superiority of our relative opinion approach and we show how it can aid visual analytics and support opinion predictions. Although the relative opinion measure is proved to be more robust compared to polling, our study also suggests that the former can advantageously complement the later in opinion prediction.

Related papers

• Analyzing and Estimating Support for U.S. Presidential Candidates in Twitter Polls [1.71952017922628]
  We examine nearly two thousand Twitter polls gauging support for U.S. presidential candidates during the 2016 and 2020 election campaigns. Our findings reveal that Twitter polls are biased in various ways, starting from the position of the presidential candidates. The 2016 and 2020 polls were predominantly crafted by older males and manifested a pronounced bias favoring candidate Donald Trump.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T14:57:29Z)
• Decoding the Silent Majority: Inducing Belief Augmented Social Graph with Large Language Model for Response Forecasting [74.68371461260946]
  SocialSense is a framework that induces a belief-centered graph on top of an existent social network, along with graph-based propagation to capture social dynamics. Our method surpasses existing state-of-the-art in experimental evaluations for both zero-shot and supervised settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T06:17:02Z)
• UniPoll: A Unified Social Media Poll Generation Framework via Multi-Objective Optimization [2.9282273207233693]
  This article explores the automatic generation of a poll from a social media post by leveraging cutting-edge natural language generation techniques. We propose a novel unified poll generation framework called UniPoll. It employs prompt tuning with multi-objective optimization to bolster the connection exploration between contexts (posts and comments) and polls (questions and answers)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-12T03:54:04Z)
• Language Models Trained on Media Diets Can Predict Public Opinion [43.824336518942]
  We introduce a novel approach to probe media diet models that emulate the opinions of subpopulations that have consumed a set of media. Our studies indicate that this approach is (1) predictive of human judgements found in survey response distributions, (2) more accurate at modeling people who follow media more closely, and (3) aligned with literature on which types of opinions are affected by media consumption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-28T06:08:25Z)
• Design and analysis of tweet-based election models for the 2021 Mexican legislative election [55.41644538483948]
  We use a dataset of 15 million election-related tweets in the six months preceding election day. We find that models using data with geographical attributes determine the results of the election with better precision and accuracy than conventional polling methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-02T12:40:05Z)
• Fast Few shot Self-attentive Semi-supervised Political Inclination Prediction [12.472629584751509]
  It is increasingly common now for policymakers/journalists to create online polls on social media to understand the political leanings of people in specific locations. We introduce a self-attentive semi-supervised framework for political inclination detection to further that objective. We found that the model is highly efficient even in resource-constrained settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-21T12:07:16Z)
• Correcting public opinion trends through Bayesian data assimilation [8.406968279478347]
  Measuring public opinion is a key focus during democratic elections. Traditional survey polling remains the most popular estimation technique. Twitter opinion mining has attempted to combat these issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-29T11:39:56Z)
• Mundus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur: Visual Communication of Uncertainty in Election Polls [56.8172499765118]
  We discuss potential sources of bias in nowcasting and forecasting. Concepts are presented to attenuate the issue of falsely perceived accuracy. One key idea is the use of Probabilities of Events instead of party shares.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-28T07:02:24Z)
• Predicting Livelihood Indicators from Community-Generated Street-Level Imagery [70.5081240396352]
  We propose an inexpensive, scalable, and interpretable approach to predict key livelihood indicators from public crowd-sourced street-level imagery. By comparing our results against ground data collected in nationally-representative household surveys, we demonstrate the performance of our approach in accurately predicting indicators of poverty, population, and health.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T18:12:12Z)
• An Iterative Approach for Identifying Complaint Based Tweets in Social Media Platforms [76.9570531352697]
  We propose an iterative methodology which aims to identify complaint based posts pertaining to the transport domain. We perform comprehensive evaluations along with releasing a novel dataset for the research purposes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-24T22:23:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.