Comparing recurrent and convolutional neural networks for predicting wave propagation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2002.08981v3
• Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 14:28:56 GMT
• Title: Comparing recurrent and convolutional neural networks for predicting wave propagation
• Authors: Stathi Fotiadis, Eduardo Pignatelli, Mario Lino Valencia, Chris Cantwell, Amos Storkey, Anil A. Bharath
• Abstract summary: We investigate the performance of recurrent and convolutional deep neural network architectures to predict the surface waves. We improve on the long-term prediction over previous methods while keeping the inference time at a fraction of numerical simulations. We also show that convolutional networks perform at least as well as recurrent networks in this task.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Dynamical systems can be modelled by partial differential equations and numerical computations are used everywhere in science and engineering. In this work, we investigate the performance of recurrent and convolutional deep neural network architectures to predict the surface waves. The system is governed by the Saint-Venant equations. We improve on the long-term prediction over previous methods while keeping the inference time at a fraction of numerical simulations. We also show that convolutional networks perform at least as well as recurrent networks in this task. Finally, we assess the generalisation capability of each network by extrapolating in longer time-frames and in different physical settings.

Related papers

• Gradient-free training of recurrent neural networks [3.272216546040443]
  We introduce a computational approach to construct all weights and biases of a recurrent neural network without using gradient-based methods. The approach is based on a combination of random feature networks and Koopman operator theory for dynamical systems. In computational experiments on time series, forecasting for chaotic dynamical systems, and control problems, we observe that the training time and forecasting accuracy of the recurrent neural networks we construct are improved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-30T21:24:34Z)
• How neural networks learn to classify chaotic time series [77.34726150561087]
  We study the inner workings of neural networks trained to classify regular-versus-chaotic time series. We find that the relation between input periodicity and activation periodicity is key for the performance of LKCNN models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-04T08:53:27Z)
• A predictive physics-aware hybrid reduced order model for reacting flows [65.73506571113623]
  A new hybrid predictive Reduced Order Model (ROM) is proposed to solve reacting flow problems. The number of degrees of freedom is reduced from thousands of temporal points to a few POD modes with their corresponding temporal coefficients. Two different deep learning architectures have been tested to predict the temporal coefficients.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-24T08:39:20Z)
• An advanced spatio-temporal convolutional recurrent neural network for storm surge predictions [73.4962254843935]
  We study the capability of artificial neural network models to emulate storm surge based on the storm track/size/intensity history. This study presents a neural network model that can predict storm surge, informed by a database of synthetic storm simulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-18T23:42:18Z)
• On the reproducibility of fully convolutional neural networks for modeling time-space evolving physical systems [0.0]
  Deep-learning fully convolutional neural network is evaluated by training several times the same network on identical conditions. Trainings performed with double floating-point precision provide slightly better estimations and a significant reduction of the variability of both the network parameters and its testing error range.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-12T07:39:30Z)
• Continuous-in-Depth Neural Networks [107.47887213490134]
  We first show that ResNets fail to be meaningful dynamical in this richer sense. We then demonstrate that neural network models can learn to represent continuous dynamical systems. We introduce ContinuousNet as a continuous-in-depth generalization of ResNet architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-05T22:54:09Z)
• Combining Differentiable PDE Solvers and Graph Neural Networks for Fluid Flow Prediction [79.81193813215872]
  We develop a hybrid (graph) neural network that combines a traditional graph convolutional network with an embedded differentiable fluid dynamics simulator inside the network itself. We show that we can both generalize well to new situations and benefit from the substantial speedup of neural network CFD predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-08T21:23:19Z)
• Liquid Time-constant Networks [117.57116214802504]
  We introduce a new class of time-continuous recurrent neural network models. Instead of declaring a learning system's dynamics by implicit nonlinearities, we construct networks of linear first-order dynamical systems. These neural networks exhibit stable and bounded behavior, yield superior expressivity within the family of neural ordinary differential equations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-08T09:53:35Z)
• Finite Difference Neural Networks: Fast Prediction of Partial Differential Equations [5.575293536755126]
  We propose a novel neural network framework, finite difference neural networks (FDNet), to learn partial differential equations from data. Specifically, our proposed finite difference inspired network is designed to learn the underlying governing partial differential equations from trajectory data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-02T19:17:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.