AI-Mediated Exchange Theory
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2003.02093v1
- Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 14:18:18 GMT
- Title: AI-Mediated Exchange Theory
- Authors: Xiao Ma, Taylor W. Brown
- Abstract summary: We propose the development of a framework AI-Mediated Exchange Theory (AI-MET)
As an extension to Social Exchange Theory (SET) in the social sciences, AI-MET views AI as influencing human-to-human relationships via a taxonomy of mediation mechanisms.
- Score: 9.100327242239203
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: As Artificial Intelligence (AI) plays an ever-expanding role in
sociotechnical systems, it is important to articulate the relationships between
humans and AI. However, the scholarly communities studying human-AI
relationships -- including but not limited to social computing, machine
learning, science and technology studies, and other social sciences -- are
divided by the perspectives that define them. These perspectives vary both by
their focus on humans or AI, and in the micro/macro lenses through which they
approach subjects. These differences inhibit the integration of findings, and
thus impede science and interdisciplinarity. In this position paper, we propose
the development of a framework AI-Mediated Exchange Theory (AI-MET) to bridge
these divides. As an extension to Social Exchange Theory (SET) in the social
sciences, AI-MET views AI as influencing human-to-human relationships via a
taxonomy of mediation mechanisms. We list initial ideas of these mechanisms,
and show how AI-MET can be used to help human-AI research communities speak to
one another.
Related papers
- Aligning Generalisation Between Humans and Machines [74.120848518198]
Recent advances in AI have resulted in technology that can support humans in scientific discovery and decision support but may also disrupt democracies and target individuals.
The responsible use of AI increasingly shows the need for human-AI teaming.
A crucial yet often overlooked aspect of these interactions is the different ways in which humans and machines generalise.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-23T18:36:07Z) - Shifting the Human-AI Relationship: Toward a Dynamic Relational Learning-Partner Model [0.0]
We advocate for a shift toward viewing AI as a learning partner, akin to a student who learns from interactions with humans.
We suggest that a "third mind" emerges through collaborative human-AI relationships.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-07T19:19:39Z) - Towards Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment: A Systematic Review for Clarifications, Framework, and Future Directions [101.67121669727354]
Recent advancements in AI have highlighted the importance of guiding AI systems towards the intended goals, ethical principles, and values of individuals and groups, a concept broadly recognized as alignment.
The lack of clarified definitions and scopes of human-AI alignment poses a significant obstacle, hampering collaborative efforts across research domains to achieve this alignment.
We introduce a systematic review of over 400 papers published between 2019 and January 2024, spanning multiple domains such as Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), Natural Language Processing (NLP), Machine Learning (ML)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-13T16:03:25Z) - Advancing Explainable AI Toward Human-Like Intelligence: Forging the
Path to Artificial Brain [0.7770029179741429]
The intersection of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and neuroscience in Explainable AI (XAI) is pivotal for enhancing transparency and interpretability in complex decision-making processes.
This paper explores the evolution of XAI methodologies, ranging from feature-based to human-centric approaches.
The challenges in achieving explainability in generative models, ensuring responsible AI practices, and addressing ethical implications are discussed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-07T14:09:11Z) - AI for social science and social science of AI: A Survey [47.5235291525383]
Recent advancements in artificial intelligence have sparked a rethinking of artificial general intelligence possibilities.
The increasing human-like capabilities of AI are also attracting attention in social science research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-22T10:57:09Z) - Human-AI Coevolution [48.74579595505374]
Coevolution AI is a process in which humans and AI algorithms continuously influence each other.
This paper introduces Coevolution AI as the cornerstone for a new field of study at the intersection between AI and complexity science.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-23T18:10:54Z) - Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society.
A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests.
This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z) - The Short Anthropological Guide to the Study of Ethical AI [91.3755431537592]
Short guide serves as both an introduction to AI ethics and social science and anthropological perspectives on the development of AI.
Aims to provide those unfamiliar with the field with an insight into the societal impact of AI systems and how, in turn, these systems can lead us to rethink how our world operates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-07T12:25:03Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.