Surveying Vulnerable Populations: A Case Study of Civil Society Organizations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2003.08580v2
• Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 21:01:40 GMT
• Title: Surveying Vulnerable Populations: A Case Study of Civil Society Organizations
• Authors: Nikita Samarin, Alisa Frik, Sean Brooks, Coye Cheshire, Serge Egelman
• Abstract summary: We conducted an anonymous online survey with 102 CSO employees to collect information about their perceived risks of different security and privacy threats. We uncovered several issues with our methodology, including the length of the survey, the framing of the questions, and the design of the recruitment email. We hope that the discussion presented in this paper will inform and assist researchers and practitioners working on understanding and improving the security and privacy of CSOs.
• Score: 9.467149414264039
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Compared to organizations in other sectors, civil society organizations (CSOs) are particularly vulnerable to security and privacy threats, as they lack adequate resources and expertise to defend themselves. At the same time, their security needs and practices have not gained much attention among researchers, and existing solutions designed for the average users do not consider the contexts in which CSO employees operate. As part of our preliminary work, we conducted an anonymous online survey with 102 CSO employees to collect information about their perceived risks of different security and privacy threats, and their self-reported mitigation strategies. The design of our preliminary survey accounted for the unique requirements of our target population by establishing trust with respondents, using anonymity-preserving incentive strategies, and distributing the survey with the help of a trusted intermediary. However, by carefully examining our methods and the feedback received from respondents, we uncovered several issues with our methodology, including the length of the survey, the framing of the questions, and the design of the recruitment email. We hope that the discussion presented in this paper will inform and assist researchers and practitioners working on understanding and improving the security and privacy of CSOs.

Related papers

• Cybersecurity Challenge Analysis of Work-from-Anywhere (WFA) and Recommendations guided by a User Study [1.1749564892273827]
  Many organizations were forced to quickly transition to the work-from-anywhere (WFA) model as a necessity to continue with their operations and remain in business despite the restrictions imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper attempts to uncover some challenges and implications related to the cybersecurity of the WFA model. We conducted an online user study to investigate the readiness and cybersecurity awareness of employers and their employees who shifted to work remotely from anywhere.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-11T18:47:04Z)
• Collection, usage and privacy of mobility data in the enterprise and public administrations [55.2480439325792]
  Security measures such as anonymization are needed to protect individuals' privacy. Within our study, we conducted expert interviews to gain insights into practices in the field. We survey privacy-enhancing methods in use, which generally do not comply with state-of-the-art standards of differential privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T08:29:27Z)
• Privacy Risks of General-Purpose AI Systems: A Foundation for Investigating Practitioner Perspectives [47.17703009473386]
  Powerful AI models have led to impressive leaps in performance across a wide range of tasks. Privacy concerns have led to a wealth of literature covering various privacy risks and vulnerabilities of AI models. We conduct a systematic review of these survey papers to provide a concise and usable overview of privacy risks in GPAIS.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T07:49:48Z)
• A Survey of Privacy-Preserving Model Explanations: Privacy Risks, Attacks, and Countermeasures [50.987594546912725]
  Despite a growing corpus of research in AI privacy and explainability, there is little attention on privacy-preserving model explanations. This article presents the first thorough survey about privacy attacks on model explanations and their countermeasures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-31T12:44:48Z)
• A Safe Harbor for AI Evaluation and Red Teaming [124.89885800509505]
  Some researchers fear that conducting such research or releasing their findings will result in account suspensions or legal reprisal. We propose that major AI developers commit to providing a legal and technical safe harbor. We believe these commitments are a necessary step towards more inclusive and unimpeded community efforts to tackle the risks of generative AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-07T20:55:08Z)
• Prioritizing Safeguarding Over Autonomy: Risks of LLM Agents for Science [65.77763092833348]
  Intelligent agents powered by large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated substantial promise in autonomously conducting experiments and facilitating scientific discoveries across various disciplines. While their capabilities are promising, these agents also introduce novel vulnerabilities that demand careful consideration for safety. This paper conducts a thorough examination of vulnerabilities in LLM-based agents within scientific domains, shedding light on potential risks associated with their misuse and emphasizing the need for safety measures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T18:54:07Z)
• Advancing Differential Privacy: Where We Are Now and Future Directions for Real-World Deployment [100.1798289103163]
  We present a detailed review of current practices and state-of-the-art methodologies in the field of differential privacy (DP) Key points and high-level contents of the article were originated from the discussions from "Differential Privacy (DP): Challenges Towards the Next Frontier" This article aims to provide a reference point for the algorithmic and design decisions within the realm of privacy, highlighting important challenges and potential research directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-14T05:29:18Z)
• Getting Users Smart Quick about Security: Results from 90 Minutes of Using a Persuasive Toolkit for Facilitating Information Security Problem Solving by Non-Professionals [2.4923006485141284]
  A balanced level of user engagement in security is difficult to achieve due to difference of priorities between the business perspective and the security perspective. We have developed a persuasive software toolkit to engage users in structured discussions about security vulnerabilities in their company. In the research reported here we examine how non-professionals perceived security problems through a short-term use of the toolkit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-06T11:37:21Z)
• SMEs' Confidentiality Concerns for Security Information Sharing [1.3452510519858993]
  Small and medium-sized enterprises are considered an essential part of the EU economy, however, highly vulnerable to cyberattacks. This paper presents the results of semi-structured interviews with seven chief information security officers of SMEs to evaluate the impact of online consent communication on motivation for information sharing. The findings demonstrate that online consent with multiple options for indicating a suitable level of agreement improved motivation for information sharing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-13T10:59:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.