From Bit To Bedside: A Practical Framework For Artificial Intelligence Product Development In Healthcare

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2003.10303v1
• Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 14:42:18 GMT
• Title: From Bit To Bedside: A Practical Framework For Artificial Intelligence Product Development In Healthcare
• Authors: David Higgins and Vince I. Madai
• Abstract summary: We present a decision perspective framework, for the development of AI-driven biomedical products. We focus on issues related to Clinical validation, Regulatory affairs, Data strategy and Algorithmic development. Our framework should be seen as a template for innovation frameworks.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare holds great potential to expand access to high-quality medical care, whilst reducing overall systemic costs. Despite hitting the headlines regularly and many publications of proofs-of-concept, certified products are failing to breakthrough to the clinic. AI in healthcare is a multi-party process with deep knowledge required in multiple individual domains. The lack of understanding of the specific challenges in the domain is, therefore, the major contributor to the failure to deliver on the big promises. Thus, we present a decision perspective framework, for the development of AI-driven biomedical products, from conception to market launch. Our framework highlights the risks, objectives and key results which are typically required to proceed through a three-phase process to the market launch of a validated medical AI product. We focus on issues related to Clinical validation, Regulatory affairs, Data strategy and Algorithmic development. The development process we propose for AI in healthcare software strongly diverges from modern consumer software development processes. We highlight the key time points to guide founders, investors and key stakeholders throughout their relevant part of the process. Our framework should be seen as a template for innovation frameworks, which can be used to coordinate team communications and responsibilities towards a reasonable product development roadmap, thus unlocking the potential of AI in medicine.

Related papers

• Engineering Trustworthy AI: A Developer Guide for Empirical Risk Minimization [53.80919781981027]
  Key requirements for trustworthy AI can be translated into design choices for the components of empirical risk minimization. We hope to provide actionable guidance for building AI systems that meet emerging standards for trustworthiness of AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-25T07:53:32Z)
• Towards Clinical AI Fairness: Filling Gaps in the Puzzle [15.543248260582217]
  This review systematically pinpoints several deficiencies concerning both healthcare data and the provided AI fairness solutions. We highlight the scarcity of research on AI fairness in many medical domains where AI technology is increasingly utilized. To bridge these gaps, our review advances actionable strategies for both the healthcare and AI research communities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T07:42:55Z)
• Leveraging Generative AI for Clinical Evidence Summarization Needs to Ensure Trustworthiness [47.51360338851017]
  Evidence-based medicine promises to improve the quality of healthcare by empowering medical decisions and practices with the best available evidence. The rapid growth of medical evidence, which can be obtained from various sources, poses a challenge in collecting, appraising, and synthesizing the evidential information. Recent advancements in generative AI, exemplified by large language models, hold promise in facilitating the arduous task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-19T03:29:45Z)
• FUTURE-AI: International consensus guideline for trustworthy and deployable artificial intelligence in healthcare [73.78776682247187]
  Concerns have been raised about the technical, clinical, ethical and legal risks associated with medical AI. This work describes the FUTURE-AI guideline as the first international consensus framework for guiding the development and deployment of trustworthy AI tools in healthcare.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-11T10:49:05Z)
• Validation of artificial intelligence containing products across the regulated healthcare industries [0.0]
  Introduction of artificial intelligence / machine learning (AI/ML) products to regulated fields poses new regulatory problems. Lack of a common terminology and understanding leads to confusion, delays and product failures. Validation as a key step in product development offers an opportune point of comparison for aligning people and processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-13T14:03:36Z)
• The Role of AI in Drug Discovery: Challenges, Opportunities, and Strategies [97.5153823429076]
  The benefits, challenges and drawbacks of AI in this field are reviewed. The use of data augmentation, explainable AI, and the integration of AI with traditional experimental methods are also discussed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-08T23:23:39Z)
• Responsible AI Implementation: A Human-centered Framework for Accelerating the Innovation Process [0.8481798330936974]
  This paper proposes a theoretical framework for responsible artificial intelligence (AI) implementation. The proposed framework emphasizes a synergistic business technology approach for the agile co-creation process. The framework emphasizes establishing and maintaining trust throughout the human-centered design and agile development of AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-15T06:24:01Z)
• FUTURE-AI: Guiding Principles and Consensus Recommendations for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging [6.099257839022179]
  FUTURE-AI framework comprises guiding principles for increased trust, safety, and adoption for AI in healthcare. We transform the general FUTURE-AI healthcare principles to a concise and specific AI implementation guide tailored to the needs of the medical imaging community.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-20T16:22:49Z)
• The Medkit-Learn(ing) Environment: Medical Decision Modelling through Simulation [81.72197368690031]
  We present a new benchmarking suite designed specifically for medical sequential decision making. The Medkit-Learn(ing) Environment is a publicly available Python package providing simple and easy access to high-fidelity synthetic medical data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-08T10:38:09Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)
• OnRAMP for Regulating AI in Medical Products [0.0]
  This Perspective proposes best practice guidelines for development compatible with the production of a regulatory package. These guidelines will allow all parties to communicate more clearly in the development of a common Good Machine Learning Practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-09T14:02:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.