Related papers: Uncertainty quantification in imaging and automatic horizon tracking: a Bayesian deep-prior based approach

Uncertainty quantification in imaging and automatic horizon tracking: a Bayesian deep-prior based approach

URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2004.00227v3
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 22:42:14 GMT
Title: Uncertainty quantification in imaging and automatic horizon tracking: a Bayesian deep-prior based approach
Authors: Ali Siahkoohi, Gabrio Rizzuti, Felix J. Herrmann
Abstract summary: Uncertainty quantification (UQ) deals with a probabilistic description of the solution nonuniqueness and data noise sensitivity. In this paper, we focus on how UQ trickles down to horizon tracking for the determination of stratigraphic models.
Score: 0.5156484100374059
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract: In inverse problems, uncertainty quantification (UQ) deals with a probabilistic description of the solution nonuniqueness and data noise sensitivity. Setting seismic imaging into a Bayesian framework allows for a principled way of studying uncertainty by solving for the model posterior distribution. Imaging, however, typically constitutes only the first stage of a sequential workflow, and UQ becomes even more relevant when applied to subsequent tasks that are highly sensitive to the inversion outcome. In this paper, we focus on how UQ trickles down to horizon tracking for the determination of stratigraphic models and investigate its sensitivity with respect to the imaging result. As such, the main contribution of this work consists in a data-guided approach to horizon tracking uncertainty analysis. This work is fundamentally based on a special reparameterization of reflectivity, known as "deep prior". Feasible models are restricted to the output of a convolutional neural network with a fixed input, while weights and biases are Gaussian random variables. Given a deep prior model, the network parameters are sampled from the posterior distribution via a Markov chain Monte Carlo method, from which the conditional mean and point-wise standard deviation of the inferred reflectivities are approximated. For each sample of the posterior distribution, a reflectivity is generated, and the horizons are tracked automatically. In this way, uncertainty on model parameters naturally translates to horizon tracking. As part of the validation for the proposed approach, we verified that the estimated confidence intervals for the horizon tracking coincide with geologically complex regions, such as faults.