Towards an Effective and Efficient Deep Learning Model for COVID-19
Patterns Detection in X-ray Images
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2004.05717v5
- Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2021 12:36:57 GMT
- Title: Towards an Effective and Efficient Deep Learning Model for COVID-19
Patterns Detection in X-ray Images
- Authors: Eduardo Luz, Pedro Lopes Silva, Rodrigo Silva, Ludmila Silva, Gladston
Moreira and David Menotti
- Abstract summary: The main goal of this work is to propose an accurate yet efficient method for the problem of COVID-19 screening in chest X-rays.
A dataset of 13,569 X-ray images divided into healthy, non-COVID-19 pneumonia, and COVID-19 patients is used to train the proposed approaches.
Results: The proposed approach was able to produce a high-quality model, with an overall accuracy of 93.9%, COVID-19, sensitivity of 96.8% and positive prediction of 100%.
- Score: 2.21653002719733
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Confronting the pandemic of COVID-19, is nowadays one of the most prominent
challenges of the human species. A key factor in slowing down the virus
propagation is the rapid diagnosis and isolation of infected patients. The
standard method for COVID-19 identification, the Reverse transcription
polymerase chain reaction method, is time-consuming and in short supply due to
the pandemic. Thus, researchers have been looking for alternative screening
methods and deep learning applied to chest X-rays of patients has been showing
promising results. Despite their success, the computational cost of these
methods remains high, which imposes difficulties to their accessibility and
availability. Thus, the main goal of this work is to propose an accurate yet
efficient method in terms of memory and processing time for the problem of
COVID-19 screening in chest X-rays. Methods: To achieve the defined objective
we exploit and extend the EfficientNet family of deep artificial neural
networks which are known for their high accuracy and low footprints in other
applications. We also exploit the underlying taxonomy of the problem with a
hierarchical classifier. A dataset of 13,569 X-ray images divided into healthy,
non-COVID-19 pneumonia, and COVID-19 patients is used to train the proposed
approaches and other 5 competing architectures. Finally, 231 images of the
three classes were used to assess the quality of the methods. Results: The
results show that the proposed approach was able to produce a high-quality
model, with an overall accuracy of 93.9%, COVID-19, sensitivity of 96.8% and
positive prediction of 100%, while having from 5 to 30 times fewer parameters
than other than the other tested architectures. Larger and more heterogeneous
databases are still needed for validation before claiming that deep learning
can assist physicians in the task of detecting COVID-19 in X-ray images.
Related papers
- Robust and Interpretable COVID-19 Diagnosis on Chest X-ray Images using
Adversarial Training [0.8287206589886881]
We train 21 convolutional neural network (CNN) models on a diverse set of 33,000+ chest X-ray (CXR) images to classify between healthy, COVID-19, and non-COVID-19 pneumonia CXRs.
Our resulting models achieved a 3-way classification accuracy, recall, and precision of up to 97.03%, 97.97%, and 99.95%, respectively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-23T23:40:01Z) - A novel framework based on deep learning and ANOVA feature selection
method for diagnosis of COVID-19 cases from chest X-ray Images [0.0]
COVID-19 was first identified in Wuhan and quickly spread worldwide.
Most accessible method for COVID-19 identification is RT-PCR.
Compared to RT-PCR, chest CT scans and chest X-ray images provide superior results.
DenseNet169 was employed to extract features from X-ray images.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-30T16:10:31Z) - The pitfalls of using open data to develop deep learning solutions for
COVID-19 detection in chest X-rays [64.02097860085202]
Deep learning models have been developed to identify COVID-19 from chest X-rays.
Results have been exceptional when training and testing on open-source data.
Data analysis and model evaluations show that the popular open-source dataset COVIDx is not representative of the real clinical problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-14T10:59:11Z) - COVID-19 Detection from Chest X-ray Images using Imprinted Weights
Approach [67.05664774727208]
Chest radiography is an alternative screening method for the COVID-19.
Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) has proven to be a viable solution at low cost and with fast speed.
To address this challenge, we propose the use of a low-shot learning approach named imprinted weights.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-04T19:01:40Z) - A novel multiple instance learning framework for COVID-19 severity
assessment via data augmentation and self-supervised learning [64.90342559393275]
How to fast and accurately assess the severity level of COVID-19 is an essential problem, when millions of people are suffering from the pandemic around the world.
We observe that there are two issues -- weak annotation and insufficient data that may obstruct automatic COVID-19 severity assessment with CT images.
Our method could obtain an average accuracy of 95.8%, with 93.6% sensitivity and 96.4% specificity, which outperformed previous works.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-07T16:30:18Z) - Classification of COVID-19 in CT Scans using Multi-Source Transfer
Learning [91.3755431537592]
We propose the use of Multi-Source Transfer Learning to improve upon traditional Transfer Learning for the classification of COVID-19 from CT scans.
With our multi-source fine-tuning approach, our models outperformed baseline models fine-tuned with ImageNet.
Our best performing model was able to achieve an accuracy of 0.893 and a Recall score of 0.897, outperforming its baseline Recall score by 9.3%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-22T11:53:06Z) - PDCOVIDNet: A Parallel-Dilated Convolutional Neural Network Architecture
for Detecting COVID-19 from Chest X-Ray Images [1.4824891788575418]
COVID-19 pandemic continues to severely undermine the prosperity of the global health system.
The use of chest X-ray images for radiological assessment is one of the essential screening techniques.
We propose a parallel-dilated convolutional neural network based COVID-19 detection system from chest x-ray images.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-29T12:28:16Z) - Integrative Analysis for COVID-19 Patient Outcome Prediction [53.11258640541513]
We combine radiomics of lung opacities and non-imaging features from demographic data, vital signs, and laboratory findings to predict need for intensive care unit admission.
Our methods may also be applied to other lung diseases including but not limited to community acquired pneumonia.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-20T19:08:50Z) - Automated Chest CT Image Segmentation of COVID-19 Lung Infection based
on 3D U-Net [0.0]
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) affects billions of lives around the world and has a significant impact on public healthcare.
We propose an innovative automated segmentation pipeline for COVID-19 infected regions.
Our method focuses on on-the-fly generation of unique and random image patches for training by performing several preprocessing methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-24T17:29:26Z) - Predicting COVID-19 Pneumonia Severity on Chest X-ray with Deep Learning [57.00601760750389]
We present a severity score prediction model for COVID-19 pneumonia for frontal chest X-ray images.
Such a tool can gauge severity of COVID-19 lung infections that can be used for escalation or de-escalation of care.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-24T23:13:16Z) - CoroNet: A deep neural network for detection and diagnosis of COVID-19
from chest x-ray images [0.0]
CoroNet is a Deep Conceptional Neural Network model to automatically detect COVID-19 infection from chest X-ray images.
The proposed model achieved an overall accuracy of 89.6% and the precision and recall rate for COVID-19 cases are 93% and 98.2%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-10T07:46:07Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.