DeepMerge: Classifying High-redshift Merging Galaxies with Deep Neural
Networks
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2004.11981v1
- Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 20:36:06 GMT
- Title: DeepMerge: Classifying High-redshift Merging Galaxies with Deep Neural
Networks
- Authors: A. \'Ciprijanovi\'c, G. F. Snyder, B. Nord, J. E. G. Peek
- Abstract summary: We show the use of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for the task of distinguishing between merging and non-merging galaxies in simulated images.
We extract images of merging and non-merging galaxies from the Illustris-1 cosmological simulation and apply observational and experimental noise.
The test set classification accuracy of the CNN is $79%$ for pristine and $76%$ for noisy.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: We investigate and demonstrate the use of convolutional neural networks
(CNNs) for the task of distinguishing between merging and non-merging galaxies
in simulated images, and for the first time at high redshifts (i.e. $z=2$). We
extract images of merging and non-merging galaxies from the Illustris-1
cosmological simulation and apply observational and experimental noise that
mimics that from the Hubble Space Telescope; the data without noise form a
"pristine" data set and that with noise form a "noisy" data set. The test set
classification accuracy of the CNN is $79\%$ for pristine and $76\%$ for noisy.
The CNN outperforms a Random Forest classifier, which was shown to be superior
to conventional one- or two-dimensional statistical methods (Concentration,
Asymmetry, the Gini, $M_{20}$ statistics etc.), which are commonly used when
classifying merging galaxies. We also investigate the selection effects of the
classifier with respect to merger state and star formation rate, finding no
bias. Finally, we extract Grad-CAMs (Gradient-weighted Class Activation
Mapping) from the results to further assess and interrogate the fidelity of the
classification model.
Related papers
- Bayesian and Convolutional Networks for Hierarchical Morphological Classification of Galaxies [1.474723404975345]
This work is focused on the morphological classification of galaxies following the Hubble sequence in which the different classes are arranged in a hierarchy.
The proposed method, BCNN, is composed of two main modules.
BCNN performed better than several CNNs in multiple evaluation measures, reaching the next scores: 67% in exact match, 78% in accuracy, and 83% in hierarchical F-measure.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-03T06:48:53Z) - E(2) Equivariant Neural Networks for Robust Galaxy Morphology
Classification [0.0]
We train, validate, and test GCNNs equivariant to discrete subgroups of $E(2)$ on the Galaxy10 DECals dataset.
An architecture equivariant to the group $D_16$ achieves a $95.52 pm 0.18%$ test-set accuracy.
All GCNNs are less susceptible to one-pixel perturbations than an identically constructed CNN.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-02T18:00:02Z) - Morphological Classification of Radio Galaxies using Semi-Supervised
Group Equivariant CNNs [0.0]
Out of the estimated few trillion galaxies, only around a million have been detected through radio frequencies.
We employ a semi-supervised learning approach to classify them into the known Fanaroff-Riley Type I (FRI) and Type II (FRII) categories.
A Group Equivariant Convolutional Neural Network (G-CNN) was used as an encoder of the state-of-the-art self-supervised methods SimCLR and BYOL.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-31T06:50:32Z) - Semi-Supervised Domain Adaptation for Cross-Survey Galaxy Morphology
Classification and Anomaly Detection [57.85347204640585]
We develop a Universal Domain Adaptation method DeepAstroUDA.
It can be applied to datasets with different types of class overlap.
For the first time, we demonstrate the successful use of domain adaptation on two very different observational datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-01T18:07:21Z) - Decoupled Mixup for Generalized Visual Recognition [71.13734761715472]
We propose a novel "Decoupled-Mixup" method to train CNN models for visual recognition.
Our method decouples each image into discriminative and noise-prone regions, and then heterogeneously combines these regions to train CNN models.
Experiment results show the high generalization performance of our method on testing data that are composed of unseen contexts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-26T15:21:39Z) - Towards an Understanding of Benign Overfitting in Neural Networks [104.2956323934544]
Modern machine learning models often employ a huge number of parameters and are typically optimized to have zero training loss.
We examine how these benign overfitting phenomena occur in a two-layer neural network setting.
We show that it is possible for the two-layer ReLU network interpolator to achieve a near minimax-optimal learning rate.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-06T19:08:53Z) - DeepSZ: Identification of Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Galaxy Clusters using Deep
Learning [5.295349225662439]
Galaxy clusters identified from the Sunyaev Zel'dovich (SZ) effect are a key ingredient in multi-wavelength cluster-based cosmology.
We present a comparison between two methods of cluster identification: the standard Matched Filter (MF) method in SZ cluster finding and a method using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-25T19:01:00Z) - DeepShadows: Separating Low Surface Brightness Galaxies from Artifacts
using Deep Learning [70.80563014913676]
We investigate the use of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for the problem of separating low-surface-brightness galaxies from artifacts in survey images.
We show that CNNs offer a very promising path in the quest to study the low-surface-brightness universe.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-24T22:51:08Z) - Deep learning for gravitational-wave data analysis: A resampling
white-box approach [62.997667081978825]
We apply Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to detect gravitational wave (GW) signals of compact binary coalescences, using single-interferometer data from LIGO detectors.
CNNs were quite precise to detect noise but not sensitive enough to recall GW signals, meaning that CNNs are better for noise reduction than generation of GW triggers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-09T03:28:57Z) - A Systematic Evaluation: Fine-Grained CNN vs. Traditional CNN
Classifiers [54.996358399108566]
We investigate the performance of the landmark general CNN classifiers, which presented top-notch results on large scale classification datasets.
We compare it against state-of-the-art fine-grained classifiers.
We show an extensive evaluation on six datasets to determine whether the fine-grained classifier is able to elevate the baseline in their experiments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-24T23:49:14Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.