Stay Hungry, Stay Focused: Generating Informative and Specific Questions
in Information-Seeking Conversations
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2004.14530v2
- Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 16:53:32 GMT
- Title: Stay Hungry, Stay Focused: Generating Informative and Specific Questions
in Information-Seeking Conversations
- Authors: Peng Qi, Yuhao Zhang, Christopher D. Manning
- Abstract summary: We investigate the problem of generating informative questions in information-asymmetric conversations.
To generate pragmatic questions, we use reinforcement learning to optimize an informativeness metric.
We demonstrate that the resulting pragmatic questioner substantially improves the informativeness and specificity of questions generated over a baseline model.
- Score: 41.74162467619795
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: We investigate the problem of generating informative questions in
information-asymmetric conversations. Unlike previous work on question
generation which largely assumes knowledge of what the answer might be, we are
interested in the scenario where the questioner is not given the context from
which answers are drawn, but must reason pragmatically about how to acquire new
information, given the shared conversation history. We identify two core
challenges: (1) formally defining the informativeness of potential questions,
and (2) exploring the prohibitively large space of potential questions to find
the good candidates. To generate pragmatic questions, we use reinforcement
learning to optimize an informativeness metric we propose, combined with a
reward function designed to promote more specific questions. We demonstrate
that the resulting pragmatic questioner substantially improves the
informativeness and specificity of questions generated over a baseline model,
as evaluated by our metrics as well as humans.
Related papers
- How to Engage Your Readers? Generating Guiding Questions to Promote Active Reading [60.19226384241482]
We introduce GuidingQ, a dataset of 10K in-text questions from textbooks and scientific articles.
We explore various approaches to generate such questions using language models.
We conduct a human study to understand the implication of such questions on reading comprehension.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-19T13:42:56Z) - Which questions should I answer? Salience Prediction of Inquisitive Questions [118.097974193544]
We show that highly salient questions are empirically more likely to be answered in the same article.
We further validate our findings by showing that answering salient questions is an indicator of summarization quality in news.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-16T21:33:05Z) - Qsnail: A Questionnaire Dataset for Sequential Question Generation [76.616068047362]
We present the first dataset specifically constructed for the questionnaire generation task, which comprises 13,168 human-written questionnaires.
We conduct experiments on Qsnail, and the results reveal that retrieval models and traditional generative models do not fully align with the given research topic and intents.
Despite enhancements through the chain-of-thought prompt and finetuning, questionnaires generated by language models still fall short of human-written questionnaires.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-22T04:14:10Z) - FOLLOWUPQG: Towards Information-Seeking Follow-up Question Generation [38.78216651059955]
We introduce the task of real-world information-seeking follow-up question generation (FQG)
We construct FOLLOWUPQG, a dataset of over 3K real-world (initial question, answer, follow-up question)s collected from a forum layman providing Reddit-friendly explanations for open-ended questions.
In contrast to existing datasets, questions in FOLLOWUPQG use more diverse pragmatic strategies to seek information, and they also show higher-order cognitive skills.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-10T11:58:29Z) - What should I Ask: A Knowledge-driven Approach for Follow-up Questions
Generation in Conversational Surveys [63.51903260461746]
We propose a novel task for knowledge-driven follow-up question generation in conversational surveys.
We constructed a new human-annotated dataset of human-written follow-up questions with dialogue history and labeled knowledge.
We then propose a two-staged knowledge-driven model for the task, which generates informative and coherent follow-up questions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-23T00:57:33Z) - Evaluating Mixed-initiative Conversational Search Systems via User
Simulation [9.066817876491053]
We propose a conversational User Simulator, called USi, for automatic evaluation of such search systems.
We show that responses generated by USi are both inline with the underlying information need and comparable to human-generated answers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-17T16:27:33Z) - Reinforcement Learning for Abstractive Question Summarization with
Question-aware Semantic Rewards [20.342580435464072]
We introduce a reinforcement learning-based framework for abstractive question summarization.
We propose two novel rewards obtained from the downstream tasks of (i) question-type identification and (ii) question-focus recognition.
These rewards ensure the generation of semantically valid questions and encourage the inclusion of key medical entities/foci in the question summary.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-01T02:06:46Z) - Inquisitive Question Generation for High Level Text Comprehension [60.21497846332531]
We introduce INQUISITIVE, a dataset of 19K questions that are elicited while a person is reading through a document.
We show that readers engage in a series of pragmatic strategies to seek information.
We evaluate question generation models based on GPT-2 and show that our model is able to generate reasonable questions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-04T19:03:39Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.