Balancing Objectives in Counseling Conversations: Advancing Forwards or Looking Backwards

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.04245v1
• Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 18:00:27 GMT
• Title: Balancing Objectives in Counseling Conversations: Advancing Forwards or Looking Backwards
• Authors: Justine Zhang, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil
• Abstract summary: We develop an unsupervised methodology to quantify how counselors manage balance. Our main intuition is that if an utterance can only receive a narrow range of appropriate replies, then its likely aim is to advance the conversation forwards. By applying this intuition, we can map each utterance to a continuous orientation axis that captures the degree to which it is intended to direct the flow of the conversation forwards or backwards.
• Score: 18.460035325229683
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Throughout a conversation, participants make choices that can orient the flow of the interaction. Such choices are particularly salient in the consequential domain of crisis counseling, where a difficulty for counselors is balancing between two key objectives: advancing the conversation towards a resolution, and empathetically addressing the crisis situation. In this work, we develop an unsupervised methodology to quantify how counselors manage this balance. Our main intuition is that if an utterance can only receive a narrow range of appropriate replies, then its likely aim is to advance the conversation forwards, towards a target within that range. Likewise, an utterance that can only appropriately follow a narrow range of possible utterances is likely aimed backwards at addressing a specific situation within that range. By applying this intuition, we can map each utterance to a continuous orientation axis that captures the degree to which it is intended to direct the flow of the conversation forwards or backwards. This unsupervised method allows us to characterize counselor behaviors in a large dataset of crisis counseling conversations, where we show that known counseling strategies intuitively align with this axis. We also illustrate how our measure can be indicative of a conversation's progress, as well as its effectiveness.

Related papers

• Interactive Dialogue Agents via Reinforcement Learning on Hindsight Regenerations [58.65755268815283]
  Many real dialogues are interactive, meaning an agent's utterances will influence their conversational partner, elicit information, or change their opinion. We use this fact to rewrite and augment existing suboptimal data, and train via offline reinforcement learning (RL) an agent that outperforms both prompting and learning from unaltered human demonstrations. Our results in a user study with real humans show that our approach greatly outperforms existing state-of-the-art dialogue agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T21:37:51Z)
• Taking a turn for the better: Conversation redirection throughout the course of mental-health therapy [9.654703213945467]
  We introduce a measure of the extent to which a certain utterance immediately redirects the flow of the conversation. We apply this new measure to characterize the development of patient-therapist relationships over multiple sessions in an online therapy platform. Our analysis reveals that patient control of the conversation's direction generally increases relative to that of the therapist as their relationship progresses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T17:54:41Z)
• Facilitating Multi-turn Emotional Support Conversation with Positive Emotion Elicitation: A Reinforcement Learning Approach [58.88422314998018]
  Emotional support conversation (ESC) aims to provide emotional support (ES) to improve one's mental state. Existing works stay at fitting grounded responses and responding strategies which ignore the effect on ES and lack explicit goals to guide emotional positive transition. We introduce a new paradigm to formalize multi-turn ESC as a process of positive emotion elicitation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-16T09:58:44Z)
• A Survey on Proactive Dialogue Systems: Problems, Methods, and Prospects [100.75759050696355]
  We provide a comprehensive overview of the prominent problems and advanced designs for conversational agent's proactivity in different types of dialogues. We discuss challenges that meet the real-world application needs but require a greater research focus in the future.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-04T11:38:49Z)
• Question-Interlocutor Scope Realized Graph Modeling over Key Utterances for Dialogue Reading Comprehension [61.55950233402972]
  We propose a new key utterances extracting method for dialogue reading comprehension. It performs prediction on the unit formed by several contiguous utterances, which can realize more answer-contained utterances. As a graph constructed on the text of utterances, we then propose Question-Interlocutor Scope Realized Graph (QuISG) modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-26T04:00:42Z)
• Towards a Progression-Aware Autonomous Dialogue Agent [14.09591070450606]
  We propose a framework in which dialogue agents can evaluate the progression of a conversation toward or away from desired outcomes. Our framework is composed of three key elements: (1) the notion of a "global" dialogue state (GDS), (2) a task-specific progression function (PF) computed in terms of a conversation's trajectory through this space, and (3) a planning mechanism based on dialogue rollouts by which an agent may use progression signals to select its next response.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-07T17:37:43Z)
• Interacting with Non-Cooperative User: A New Paradigm for Proactive Dialogue Policy [83.61404191470126]
  We propose a new solution named I-Pro that can learn Proactive policy in the Interactive setting. Specifically, we learn the trade-off via a learned goal weight, which consists of four factors. The experimental results demonstrate I-Pro significantly outperforms baselines in terms of effectiveness and interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-07T14:11:31Z)
• Facilitating the Communication of Politeness through Fine-Grained Paraphrasing [18.471262688125645]
  We take the first steps towards automatically assisting people in adjusting their language to a specific communication circumstance. As a case study, we focus on facilitating the accurate transmission of pragmatic intentions. We introduce a methodology for suggesting paraphrases that achieve the intended level of politeness under a given communication circumstance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-30T19:00:00Z)
• Quantifying the Causal Effects of Conversational Tendencies [17.506263520769927]
  Drawing causal links between conversational behaviors and outcomes is a necessary step in using them in a prescriptive fashion. We focus on the task of determining a particular type of policy for a text-based crisis counseling platform. We show how to circumvent these inference challenges in our particular domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-08T18:00:00Z)
• Dynamic Knowledge Routing Network For Target-Guided Open-Domain Conversation [79.7781436501706]
  We propose a structured approach that controls the intended content of system responses by introducing coarse-grained keywords. We also propose a novel dual discourse-level target-guided strategy to guide conversations to reach their goals smoothly with higher success rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-04T09:49:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.