Article citation study: Context enhanced citation sentiment detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.04534v1
• Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 00:27:19 GMT
• Title: Article citation study: Context enhanced citation sentiment detection
• Authors: Vishal Vyas, Kumar Ravi, Vadlamani Ravi, V.Uma, Srirangaraj Setlur, Venu Govindaraju
• Abstract summary: Citation sentimet analysis is one of the little studied tasks for scientometric analysis. We developed eight datasets comprising citation sentences, which are manually annotated by us into three sentiment polarities. We proposed an ensembled feature engineering method comprising word embeddings obtained for texts, parts-of-speech tags, and dependency relationships together.
• Score: 11.610277023001807
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Citation sentimet analysis is one of the little studied tasks for scientometric analysis. For citation analysis, we developed eight datasets comprising citation sentences, which are manually annotated by us into three sentiment polarities viz. positive, negative, and neutral. Among eight datasets, three were developed by considering the whole context of citations. Furthermore, we proposed an ensembled feature engineering method comprising word embeddings obtained for texts, parts-of-speech tags, and dependency relationships together. Ensembled features were considered as input to deep learning based approaches for citation sentiment classification, which is in turn compared with Bag-of-Words approach. Experimental results demonstrate that deep learning is useful for higher number of samples, whereas support vector machine is the winner for smaller number of samples. Moreover, context-based samples are proved to be more effective than context-less samples for citation sentiment analysis.

Related papers

• Towards Fine-Grained Citation Evaluation in Generated Text: A Comparative Analysis of Faithfulness Metrics [22.041561519672456]
  Large language models (LLMs) often produce unsupported or unverifiable content, known as "hallucinations" We propose a comparative evaluation framework that assesses the metric effectiveness in distinguishing citations between three-category support levels. Our results show no single metric consistently excels across all evaluations, revealing the complexity of assessing fine-grained support.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-21T15:57:24Z)
• ALiiCE: Evaluating Positional Fine-grained Citation Generation [54.19617927314975]
  We propose ALiiCE, the first automatic evaluation framework for fine-grained citation generation. Our framework first parses the sentence claim into atomic claims via dependency analysis and then calculates citation quality at the atomic claim level. We evaluate the positional fine-grained citation generation performance of several Large Language Models on two long-form QA datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T09:16:14Z)
• Persian Homograph Disambiguation: Leveraging ParsBERT for Enhanced Sentence Understanding with a Novel Word Disambiguation Dataset [0.0]
  We introduce a novel dataset tailored for Persian homograph disambiguation. Our work encompasses a thorough exploration of various embeddings, evaluated through the cosine similarity method. We scrutinize the models' performance in terms of Accuracy, Recall, and F1 Score.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T14:56:36Z)
• Detecting Statements in Text: A Domain-Agnostic Few-Shot Solution [1.3654846342364308]
  State-of-the-art approaches usually involve fine-tuning models on large annotated datasets, which are costly to produce. We propose and release a qualitative and versatile few-shot learning methodology as a common paradigm for any claim-based textual classification task. We illustrate this methodology in the context of three tasks: climate change contrarianism detection, topic/stance classification and depression-relates symptoms detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-09T12:03:38Z)
• Inline Citation Classification using Peripheral Context and Time-evolving Augmentation [23.88211560188731]
  We propose a new dataset, named 3Cext, which provides discourse information using the cited sentences. We propose PeriCite, a Transformer-based deep neural network that fuses peripheral sentences and domain knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-01T09:11:07Z)
• Semantic Analysis for Automated Evaluation of the Potential Impact of Research Articles [62.997667081978825]
  This paper presents a novel method for vector representation of text meaning based on information theory. We show how this informational semantics is used for text classification on the basis of the Leicester Scientific Corpus. We show that an informational approach to representing the meaning of a text has offered a way to effectively predict the scientific impact of research papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-26T20:37:13Z)
• On the Use of Context for Predicting Citation Worthiness of Sentences in Scholarly Articles [10.28696219236292]
  We formulate this problem as a sequence labeling task solved using a hierarchical BiLSTM model. We contribute a new benchmark dataset containing over two million sentences and their corresponding labels. Our results quantify the benefits of using context and contextual embeddings for citation worthiness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-18T21:47:30Z)
• An Unsupervised Sampling Approach for Image-Sentence Matching Using Document-Level Structural Information [64.66785523187845]
  We focus on the problem of unsupervised image-sentence matching. Existing research explores to utilize document-level structural information to sample positive and negative instances for model training. We propose a new sampling strategy to select additional intra-document image-sentence pairs as positive or negative samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-21T05:43:29Z)
• What's New? Summarizing Contributions in Scientific Literature [85.95906677964815]
  We introduce a new task of disentangled paper summarization, which seeks to generate separate summaries for the paper contributions and the context of the work. We extend the S2ORC corpus of academic articles by adding disentangled "contribution" and "context" reference labels. We propose a comprehensive automatic evaluation protocol which reports the relevance, novelty, and disentanglement of generated outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-06T02:23:01Z)
• Weakly-Supervised Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis via Joint Aspect-Sentiment Topic Embedding [71.2260967797055]
  We propose a weakly-supervised approach for aspect-based sentiment analysis. We learn sentiment, aspect> joint topic embeddings in the word embedding space. We then use neural models to generalize the word-level discriminative information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-13T21:33:24Z)
• A computational model implementing subjectivity with the 'Room Theory'. The case of detecting Emotion from Text [68.8204255655161]
  This work introduces a new method to consider subjectivity and general context dependency in text analysis. By using similarity measure between words, we are able to extract the relative relevance of the elements in the benchmark. This method could be applied to all the cases where evaluating subjectivity is relevant to understand the relative value or meaning of a text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-12T21:26:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.