An Exploratory Study of COVID-19 Misinformation on Twitter

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.05710v2
• Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 19:13:30 GMT
• Title: An Exploratory Study of COVID-19 Misinformation on Twitter
• Authors: Gautam Kishore Shahi and Anne Dirkson and Tim A. Majchrzak
• Abstract summary: During the COVID-19 pandemic, social media has become a home ground for misinformation. We have conducted an exploratory study into the propagation, authors and content of misinformation on Twitter around the topic of COVID-19.
• Score: 5.070542698701158
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: During the COVID-19 pandemic, social media has become a home ground for misinformation. To tackle this infodemic, scientific oversight, as well as a better understanding by practitioners in crisis management, is needed. We have conducted an exploratory study into the propagation, authors and content of misinformation on Twitter around the topic of COVID-19 in order to gain early insights. We have collected all tweets mentioned in the verdicts of fact-checked claims related to COVID-19 by over 92 professional fact-checking organisations between January and mid-July 2020 and share this corpus with the community. This resulted in 1 500 tweets relating to 1 274 false and 276 partially false claims, respectively. Exploratory analysis of author accounts revealed that the verified twitter handle(including Organisation/celebrity) are also involved in either creating (new tweets) or spreading (retweet) the misinformation. Additionally, we found that false claims propagate faster than partially false claims. Compare to a background corpus of COVID-19 tweets, tweets with misinformation are more often concerned with discrediting other information on social media. Authors use less tentative language and appear to be more driven by concerns of potential harm to others. Our results enable us to suggest gaps in the current scientific coverage of the topic as well as propose actions for authorities and social media users to counter misinformation.

Related papers

• "Here's Your Evidence": False Consensus in Public Twitter Discussions of COVID-19 Science [50.08057052734799]
  We estimate scientific consensus based on samples of abstracts from preprint servers. We find that anti-consensus posts and users, though overall less numerous than pro-consensus ones, are vastly over-represented on Twitter.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-24T06:16:57Z)
• "COVID-19 was a FIFA conspiracy #curropt": An Investigation into the Viral Spread of COVID-19 Misinformation [60.268682953952506]
  We estimate the extent to which misinformation has influenced the course of the COVID-19 pandemic using natural language processing models. We provide a strategy to combat social media posts that are likely to cause widespread harm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-12T19:41:01Z)
• Cross-lingual COVID-19 Fake News Detection [54.125563009333995]
  We make the first attempt to detect COVID-19 misinformation in a low-resource language (Chinese) only using the fact-checked news in a high-resource language (English) We propose a deep learning framework named CrossFake to jointly encode the cross-lingual news body texts and capture the news content. Empirical results on our dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of CrossFake under the cross-lingual setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T04:44:02Z)
• Misinfo Belief Frames: A Case Study on Covid & Climate News [49.979419711713795]
  We propose a formalism for understanding how readers perceive the reliability of news and the impact of misinformation. We introduce the Misinfo Belief Frames (MBF) corpus, a dataset of 66k inferences over 23.5k headlines. Our results using large-scale language modeling to predict misinformation frames show that machine-generated inferences can influence readers' trust in news headlines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-18T09:50:11Z)
• CML-COVID: A Large-Scale COVID-19 Twitter Dataset with Latent Topics, Sentiment and Location Information [0.0]
  CML-COVID is a COVID-19 Twitter data set of 19,298,967 million tweets from 5,977,653 unique individuals. These tweets were collected between March 2020 and July 2020 using the query terms coronavirus, covid and mask related to COVID-19.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-28T18:59:10Z)
• Predicting Misinformation and Engagement in COVID-19 Twitter Discourse in the First Months of the Outbreak [1.2059055685264957]
  We examine nearly 505K COVID-19-related tweets from the initial months of the pandemic to understand misinformation as a function of bot-behavior and engagement. We found that real users tweet both facts and misinformation, while bots tweet proportionally more misinformation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-03T18:47:34Z)
• The Role of the Crowd in Countering Misinformation: A Case Study of the COVID-19 Infodemic [15.885290526721544]
  We focus on tweets related to the COVID-19 pandemic, analyzing the spread of misinformation, professional fact checks, and the crowd response to popular misleading claims about COVID-19. We train a classifier to create a novel dataset of 155,468 COVID-19-related tweets, containing 33,237 false claims and 33,413 refuting arguments. We observe that the surge in misinformation tweets results in a quick response and a corresponding increase in tweets that refute such misinformation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-11T13:48:44Z)
• ArCOV19-Rumors: Arabic COVID-19 Twitter Dataset for Misinformation Detection [6.688963029270579]
  ArCOV19-Rumors is an Arabic COVID-19 Twitter dataset for misinformation detection composed of tweets containing claims from 27th January till the end of April 2020. We collected 138 verified claims, mostly from popular fact-checking websites, and identified 9.4K relevant tweets to those claims. Tweets were manually-annotated by veracity to support research on misinformation detection, which is one of the major problems faced during a pandemic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-17T11:21:40Z)
• Understanding the Hoarding Behaviors during the COVID-19 Pandemic using Large Scale Social Media Data [77.34726150561087]
  We analyze the hoarding and anti-hoarding patterns of over 42,000 unique Twitter users in the United States from March 1 to April 30, 2020. We find the percentage of females in both hoarding and anti-hoarding groups is higher than that of the general Twitter user population. The LIWC anxiety mean for the hoarding-related tweets is significantly higher than the baseline Twitter anxiety mean.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T16:02:25Z)
• Misinformation Has High Perplexity [55.47422012881148]
  We propose to leverage the perplexity to debunk false claims in an unsupervised manner. First, we extract reliable evidence from scientific and news sources according to sentence similarity to the claims. Second, we prime a language model with the extracted evidence and finally evaluate the correctness of given claims based on the perplexity scores at debunking time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-08T15:13:44Z)
• COVID-19 on Social Media: Analyzing Misinformation in Twitter Conversations [22.43295864610142]
  We collected streaming data related to COVID-19 using the Twitter API, starting March 1, 2020. We identified unreliable and misleading contents based on fact-checking sources. We examined the narratives promoted in misinformation tweets, along with the distribution of engagements with these tweets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-26T09:48:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.