Breaking the Sample Size Barrier in Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Model

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.12900v8
• Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 15:37:59 GMT
• Title: Breaking the Sample Size Barrier in Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Model
• Authors: Gen Li, Yuting Wei, Yuejie Chi, Yuxin Chen
• Abstract summary: This paper is concerned with the sample efficiency of reinforcement learning, assuming access to a generative model (or simulator) We first consider $gamma$-discounted infinite-horizon Markov decision processes (MDPs) with state space $mathcalS$ and action space $mathcalA$. We prove that a plain model-based planning algorithm suffices to achieve minimax-optimal sample complexity given any target accuracy level.
• Score: 50.38446482252857
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper is concerned with the sample efficiency of reinforcement learning, assuming access to a generative model (or simulator). We first consider $\gamma$-discounted infinite-horizon Markov decision processes (MDPs) with state space $\mathcal{S}$ and action space $\mathcal{A}$. Despite a number of prior works tackling this problem, a complete picture of the trade-offs between sample complexity and statistical accuracy is yet to be determined. In particular, all prior results suffer from a severe sample size barrier, in the sense that their claimed statistical guarantees hold only when the sample size exceeds at least $\frac{|\mathcal{S}||\mathcal{A}|}{(1-\gamma)^2}$. The current paper overcomes this barrier by certifying the minimax optimality of two algorithms -- a perturbed model-based algorithm and a conservative model-based algorithm -- as soon as the sample size exceeds the order of $\frac{|\mathcal{S}||\mathcal{A}|}{1-\gamma}$ (modulo some log factor). Moving beyond infinite-horizon MDPs, we further study time-inhomogeneous finite-horizon MDPs, and prove that a plain model-based planning algorithm suffices to achieve minimax-optimal sample complexity given any target accuracy level. To the best of our knowledge, this work delivers the first minimax-optimal guarantees that accommodate the entire range of sample sizes (beyond which finding a meaningful policy is information theoretically infeasible).

Related papers

• Settling the Sample Complexity of Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning [50.5790774201146]
  offline reinforcement learning (RL) learns using pre-collected data without further exploration. Prior algorithms or analyses either suffer from suboptimal sample complexities or incur high burn-in cost to reach sample optimality. We demonstrate that the model-based (or "plug-in") approach achieves minimax-optimal sample complexity without burn-in cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T17:26:19Z)
• Breaking the Sample Complexity Barrier to Regret-Optimal Model-Free Reinforcement Learning [52.76230802067506]
  A novel model-free algorithm is proposed to minimize regret in episodic reinforcement learning. The proposed algorithm employs an em early-settled reference update rule, with the aid of two Q-learning sequences. The design principle of our early-settled variance reduction method might be of independent interest to other RL settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-09T21:13:48Z)
• Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning for Linearly-Parameterized MDPs with a Generative Model [3.749193647980305]
  This paper considers a Markov decision process (MDP) that admits a set of state-action features. We show that a model-based approach (resp.$$Q-learning) provably learns an $varepsilon$-optimal policy with high probability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-28T17:49:39Z)
• Is Plug-in Solver Sample-Efficient for Feature-based Reinforcement Learning? [30.065091907118827]
  This work considers sample complexity of finding an $epsilon$-optimal policy in a Markov decision process (MDP) We solve this problem via a plug-in solver approach, which builds an empirical model and plans in this empirical model via an arbitrary plug-in solver. We show that a plug-in approach can be sample efficient as well, providing a flexible approach to design model-based algorithms for reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-12T13:13:01Z)
• Adaptive Sampling for Best Policy Identification in Markov Decision Processes [79.4957965474334]
  We investigate the problem of best-policy identification in discounted Markov Decision (MDPs) when the learner has access to a generative model. The advantages of state-of-the-art algorithms are discussed and illustrated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-28T15:22:24Z)
• Model-Based Multi-Agent RL in Zero-Sum Markov Games with Near-Optimal Sample Complexity [67.02490430380415]
  We show that model-based MARL achieves a sample complexity of $tilde O(|S||B|(gamma)-3epsilon-2)$ for finding the Nash equilibrium (NE) value up to some $epsilon$ error. We also show that such a sample bound is minimax-optimal (up to logarithmic factors) if the algorithm is reward-agnostic, where the algorithm queries state transition samples without reward knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-15T03:25:24Z)
• Sample Complexity of Asynchronous Q-Learning: Sharper Analysis and Variance Reduction [63.41789556777387]
  Asynchronous Q-learning aims to learn the optimal action-value function (or Q-function) of a Markov decision process (MDP) We show that the number of samples needed to yield an entrywise $varepsilon$-accurate estimate of the Q-function is at most on the order of $frac1mu_min (1-gamma)5varepsilon2+ fract_mixmu_min (1-gamma)$ up to some logarithmic factor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-04T17:51:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.