Energy-Time Uncertainty Relation for Absorbing Boundaries

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14514v2
• Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 10:22:16 GMT
• Title: Energy-Time Uncertainty Relation for Absorbing Boundaries
• Authors: Roderich Tumulka
• Abstract summary: We prove the uncertainty relation $sigma_T, sigma_E geq hbar/2$ between the time $T$ of detection of a quantum particle on the surface.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We prove the uncertainty relation $\sigma_T \, \sigma_E \geq \hbar/2$ between the time $T$ of detection of a quantum particle on the surface $\partial \Omega$ of a region $\Omega\subset \mathbb{R}^3$ containing the particle's initial wave function, using the "absorbing boundary rule" for detection time, and the energy $E$ of the initial wave function. Here, $\sigma$ denotes the standard deviation of the probability distribution associated with a quantum observable and a wave function. Since $T$ is associated with a POVM rather than a self-adjoint operator, the relation is not an instance of the standard version of the uncertainty relation due to Robertson and Schr\"odinger. We also prove that if there is nonzero probability that the particle never reaches $\partial \Omega$ (in which case we write $T=\infty$), and if $\sigma_T$ denotes the standard deviation conditional on the event $T<\infty$, then $\sigma_T \, \sigma_E \geq (\hbar/2) \sqrt{\mathrm{Prob}(T<\infty)}$.

Related papers

• Dimension-free Private Mean Estimation for Anisotropic Distributions [55.86374912608193]
  Previous private estimators on distributions over $mathRd suffer from a curse of dimensionality. We present an algorithm whose sample complexity has improved dependence on dimension.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-01T17:59:53Z)
• Quantum connection, charges and virtual particles [65.268245109828]
  A quantum bundle $L_hbar$ is endowed with a connection $A_hbar$ and its sections are standard wave functions $psi$ obeying the Schr"odinger equation. We will lift the bundles $L_Cpm$ and connection $A_hbar$ on them to the relativistic phase space $T*R3,1$ and couple them to the Dirac spinor bundle describing both particles and antiparticles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T10:27:09Z)
• Thermalization of closed chaotic many-body quantum systems [0.0]
  We investigate thermalization of a chaotic many-body quantum system by combining the Hartree-Fock approach and the Bohigas-Giannoni-Schmit conjecture. We show that in the semiclassical regime, $rm Tr (A rho(t))$ decays with time scale $hbar / Delta$ towards an equilibrium value.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-04T11:16:35Z)
• A Unified Framework for Uniform Signal Recovery in Nonlinear Generative Compressed Sensing [68.80803866919123]
  Under nonlinear measurements, most prior results are non-uniform, i.e., they hold with high probability for a fixed $mathbfx*$ rather than for all $mathbfx*$ simultaneously. Our framework accommodates GCS with 1-bit/uniformly quantized observations and single index models as canonical examples. We also develop a concentration inequality that produces tighter bounds for product processes whose index sets have low metric entropy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-25T17:54:19Z)
• Quantum delay in the time of arrival of free-falling atoms [0.0]
  We show that the distribution of a time measurement at a fixed position can be directly inferred from the distribution of a position measurement at a fixed time as given by the Born rule. In an application to a quantum particle of mass $m$ falling in a uniform gravitational field $g, we use this approach to obtain an exact explicit expression for the probability density of the time-of-arrival.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-03T15:51:27Z)
• Uncertainties in Quantum Measurements: A Quantum Tomography [52.77024349608834]
  The observables associated with a quantum system $S$ form a non-commutative algebra $mathcal A_S$. It is assumed that a density matrix $rho$ can be determined from the expectation values of observables. Abelian algebras do not have inner automorphisms, so the measurement apparatus can determine mean values of observables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-14T16:29:53Z)
• Random quantum circuits transform local noise into global white noise [118.18170052022323]
  We study the distribution over measurement outcomes of noisy random quantum circuits in the low-fidelity regime. For local noise that is sufficiently weak and unital, correlations (measured by the linear cross-entropy benchmark) between the output distribution $p_textnoisy$ of a generic noisy circuit instance shrink exponentially. If the noise is incoherent, the output distribution approaches the uniform distribution $p_textunif$ at precisely the same rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-29T19:26:28Z)
• The Principle of equal Probabilities of Quantum States [0.0]
  Boltzmann law $P(epsilon) = frac1langle epsilon rangle-fracepsilonlangle epsilon rangle ; ; ;;;; 0leq epsilon +infty$ where $langle epsilon rangle = E/N$. kappa quanta, is given by $p(kappa)=fracdisplaystyle binomN+s
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-17T17:23:46Z)
• Bosonic quantum communication across arbitrarily high loss channels [68.58838842613457]
  A general attenuator $Phi_lambda, sigma$ is a bosonic quantum channel that acts by combining the input with a fixed environment state. We show that for any arbitrary value of $lambda>0$ there exists a suitable single-mode state $sigma(lambda)$. Our result holds even when we fix an energy constraint at the input of the channel, and implies that quantum communication at a constant rate is possible even in the limit of arbitrarily low transmissivity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-19T16:50:11Z)
• Existence of Schrodinger Evolution with Absorbing Boundary Condition [0.0]
  Consider a non-relativistic quantum particle with wave function inside a region $Omegasubset mathbbR3$. The question how to compute the probability distribution of the time at which the detector surface registers the particle boils down to finding a reasonable mathematical definition of an ideal detecting surface. A particularly convincing definition, called the absorbing boundary rule, involves a time evolution for the particle's wave function $psi$ expressed by a Schrodinger equation in $Omega$ together with an "absorbing" boundary condition on $partial Omega$ first considered by Werner in
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-12-27T10:53:31Z)
• Detection Time Distribution for Several Quantum Particles [0.0]
  We address the question of how to compute the probability distribution of the time at which a detector clicks. A key element of this extension is that, upon a detection event, the wave function gets collapsed by inserting the detected position. We also describe an extension of the absorbing boundary rule to the case of moving detectors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2016-01-15T10:56:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.