Contextual Bandits with Side-Observations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.03951v2
• Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 21:27:46 GMT
• Title: Contextual Bandits with Side-Observations
• Authors: Rahul Singh, Fang Liu, Xin Liu, Ness Shroff
• Abstract summary: We investigate contextual bandits in the presence of side-observations across arms in order to design recommendation algorithms for users connected via social networks. We show that a naive application of existing learning algorithms results in $Oleft(Nlog Tright)$ regret, where $N$ is the number of users.
• Score: 10.248045133793287
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We investigate contextual bandits in the presence of side-observations across arms in order to design recommendation algorithms for users connected via social networks. Users in social networks respond to their friends' activity, and hence provide information about each other's preferences. In our model, when a learning algorithm recommends an article to a user, not only does it observe his/her response (e.g. an ad click), but also the side-observations, i.e., the response of his neighbors if they were presented with the same article. We model these observation dependencies by a graph $\mathcal{G}$ in which nodes correspond to users, and edges correspond to social links. We derive a problem/instance-dependent lower-bound on the regret of any consistent algorithm. We propose an optimization (linear programming) based data-driven learning algorithm that utilizes the structure of $\mathcal{G}$ in order to make recommendations to users and show that it is asymptotically optimal, in the sense that its regret matches the lower-bound as the number of rounds $T\to\infty$. We show that this asymptotically optimal regret is upper-bounded as $O\left(|\chi(\mathcal{G})|\log T\right)$, where $|\chi(\mathcal{G})|$ is the domination number of $\mathcal{G}$. In contrast, a naive application of the existing learning algorithms results in $O\left(N\log T\right)$ regret, where $N$ is the number of users.

Related papers

• A statistical perspective on algorithm unrolling models for inverse problems [2.7163621600184777]
  In inverse problems where the conditional distribution of the observation $bf y$ given the latent variable of interest $bf x$ is known, we consider algorithm unrolling. We show that the unrolling depth needed for the optimal statistical performance of GDNs is of order $log(n)/log(varrho_n-1)$, where $n$ is the sample size. We also show that when the negative log-density of the latent variable $bf x$ has a simple proximal operator, then a GDN unrolled at depth $
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-10T20:52:20Z)
• UniRank: Unimodal Bandit Algorithm for Online Ranking [0.0]
  We create an algorithm with an expected regret matching $O(fracLlog(L)Deltalog(T))$ with $2L$ players, $T$ and a minimum reward gap $Delta$. Some experimental results finally show these theoretical results are corroborated in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-02T15:01:33Z)
• A Near-Optimal Best-of-Both-Worlds Algorithm for Online Learning with Feedback Graphs [21.563733343861713]
  We consider online learning with feedback graphs, a sequential decision-making framework where the learner's feedback is determined by a directed graph over the action set. We present a computationally efficient algorithm for learning in this framework that simultaneously achieves near-optimal regret bounds in both and adversarial environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-01T15:14:32Z)
• Logarithmic Regret from Sublinear Hints [76.87432703516942]
  We show that an algorithm can obtain $O(log T)$ regret with just $O(sqrtT)$ hints under a natural query model. We also show that $o(sqrtT)$ hints cannot guarantee better than $Omega(sqrtT)$ regret.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-09T16:50:18Z)
• Contextual Recommendations and Low-Regret Cutting-Plane Algorithms [49.91214213074933]
  We consider the following variant of contextual linear bandits motivated by routing applications in navigational engines and recommendation systems. We design novel cutting-plane algorithms with low "regret" -- the total distance between the true point $w*$ and the hyperplanes the separation oracle returns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-09T05:39:05Z)
• Optimal Regret Algorithm for Pseudo-1d Bandit Convex Optimization [51.23789922123412]
  We study online learning with bandit feedback (i.e. learner has access to only zeroth-order oracle) where cost/reward functions admit a "pseudo-1d" structure. We show a lower bound of $min(sqrtdT, T3/4)$ for the regret of any algorithm, where $T$ is the number of rounds. We propose a new algorithm sbcalg that combines randomized online gradient descent with a kernelized exponential weights method to exploit the pseudo-1d structure effectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-15T08:16:51Z)
• Near-Optimal Regret Bounds for Contextual Combinatorial Semi-Bandits with Linear Payoff Functions [53.77572276969548]
  We show that the C$2$UCB algorithm has the optimal regret bound $tildeO(dsqrtkT + dk)$ for the partition matroid constraints. For general constraints, we propose an algorithm that modifies the reward estimates of arms in the C$2$UCB algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-20T04:29:18Z)
• Adversarial Linear Contextual Bandits with Graph-Structured Side Observations [80.95090605985042]
  A learning agent repeatedly chooses from a set of $K$ actions after being presented with a $d$-dimensional context vector. The agent incurs and observes the loss of the chosen action, but also observes the losses of its neighboring actions in the observation structures. Two efficient algorithms are developed based on textttEXP3.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-10T15:40:07Z)
• Agnostic Q-learning with Function Approximation in Deterministic Systems: Tight Bounds on Approximation Error and Sample Complexity [94.37110094442136]
  We study the problem of agnostic $Q$-learning with function approximation in deterministic systems. We show that if $delta = Oleft(rho/sqrtdim_Eright)$, then one can find the optimal policy using $Oleft(dim_Eright)$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-17T18:41:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.