Conformal Inference of Counterfactuals and Individual Treatment Effects

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.06138v2
• Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 00:54:35 GMT
• Title: Conformal Inference of Counterfactuals and Individual Treatment Effects
• Authors: Lihua Lei and Emmanuel J. Cand\`es
• Abstract summary: We propose a conformal inference-based approach that can produce reliable interval estimates for counterfactuals and individual treatment effects. Existing methods suffer from a significant coverage deficit even in simple models.
• Score: 6.810856082577402
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Evaluating treatment effect heterogeneity widely informs treatment decision making. At the moment, much emphasis is placed on the estimation of the conditional average treatment effect via flexible machine learning algorithms. While these methods enjoy some theoretical appeal in terms of consistency and convergence rates, they generally perform poorly in terms of uncertainty quantification. This is troubling since assessing risk is crucial for reliable decision-making in sensitive and uncertain environments. In this work, we propose a conformal inference-based approach that can produce reliable interval estimates for counterfactuals and individual treatment effects under the potential outcome framework. For completely randomized or stratified randomized experiments with perfect compliance, the intervals have guaranteed average coverage in finite samples regardless of the unknown data generating mechanism. For randomized experiments with ignorable compliance and general observational studies obeying the strong ignorability assumption, the intervals satisfy a doubly robust property which states the following: the average coverage is approximately controlled if either the propensity score or the conditional quantiles of potential outcomes can be estimated accurately. Numerical studies on both synthetic and real datasets empirically demonstrate that existing methods suffer from a significant coverage deficit even in simple models. In contrast, our methods achieve the desired coverage with reasonably short intervals.

Related papers

• Probabilistic Conformal Prediction with Approximate Conditional Validity [81.30551968980143]
  We develop a new method for generating prediction sets that combines the flexibility of conformal methods with an estimate of the conditional distribution. Our method consistently outperforms existing approaches in terms of conditional coverage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T20:44:48Z)
• Conformal Counterfactual Inference under Hidden Confounding [19.190396053530417]
  Predicting potential outcomes along with its uncertainty in a counterfactual world poses the foundamental challenge in causal inference. Existing methods that construct confidence intervals for counterfactuals either rely on the assumption of strong ignorability. We propose a novel approach based on transductive weighted conformal prediction, which provides confidence intervals for counterfactual outcomes with marginal converage guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-20T21:43:43Z)
• Counterfactual Generative Models for Time-Varying Treatments [15.208067770012283]
  Estimating the counterfactual outcome of treatment is essential for decision-making in public health and clinical science. We propose a novel conditional generative framework capable of producing counterfactual samples under time-varying treatment. We present a thorough evaluation of our method using both synthetic and real-world data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-25T05:45:53Z)
• B-Learner: Quasi-Oracle Bounds on Heterogeneous Causal Effects Under Hidden Confounding [51.74479522965712]
  We propose a meta-learner called the B-Learner, which can efficiently learn sharp bounds on the CATE function under limits on hidden confounding. We prove its estimates are valid, sharp, efficient, and have a quasi-oracle property with respect to the constituent estimators under more general conditions than existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-20T18:07:19Z)
• Causal Inference under Data Restrictions [0.0]
  This dissertation focuses on modern causal inference under uncertainty and data restrictions. It includes applications to neoadjuvant clinical trials, distributed data networks, and robust individualized decision making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-20T20:14:32Z)
• Continuous-Time Modeling of Counterfactual Outcomes Using Neural Controlled Differential Equations [84.42837346400151]
  Estimating counterfactual outcomes over time has the potential to unlock personalized healthcare. Existing causal inference approaches consider regular, discrete-time intervals between observations and treatment decisions. We propose a controllable simulation environment based on a model of tumor growth for a range of scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-16T17:15:15Z)
• Robust and Agnostic Learning of Conditional Distributional Treatment Effects [62.44901952244514]
  The conditional average treatment effect (CATE) is the best point prediction of individual causal effects. In aggregate analyses, this is usually addressed by measuring distributional treatment effect (DTE) We provide a new robust and model-agnostic methodology for learning the conditional DTE (CDTE) for a wide class of problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T17:40:31Z)
• Partial Identification of Dose Responses with Hidden Confounders [25.468473751289036]
  Inferring causal effects of continuous-valued treatments from observational data is a crucial task. We present novel methodology to bound both average and conditional average continuous-valued treatment-effect estimates. We apply our method to a real-world observational case study to demonstrate the value of identifying dose-dependent causal effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-24T07:02:21Z)
• Counterfactual inference for sequential experiments [17.817769460838665]
  We consider after-study statistical inference for sequentially designed experiments wherein multiple units are assigned treatments for multiple time points. Our goal is to provide inference guarantees for the counterfactual mean at the smallest possible scale. We illustrate our theory via several simulations and a case study involving data from a mobile health clinical trial HeartSteps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-14T17:24:27Z)
• Treatment Effect Risk: Bounds and Inference [58.442274475425144]
  Since the average treatment effect measures the change in social welfare, even if positive, there is a risk of negative effect on, say, some 10% of the population. In this paper we consider how to nonetheless assess this important risk measure, formalized as the conditional value at risk (CVaR) of the ITE distribution. Some bounds can also be interpreted as summarizing a complex CATE function into a single metric and are of interest independently of being a bound.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-15T17:21:26Z)
• Enabling Counterfactual Survival Analysis with Balanced Representations [64.17342727357618]
  Survival data are frequently encountered across diverse medical applications, i.e., drug development, risk profiling, and clinical trials. We propose a theoretically grounded unified framework for counterfactual inference applicable to survival outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-14T01:15:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.