Extracting and categorising the reactions to COVID-19 by the South African public -- A social media study

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.06336v2
• Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 08:33:32 GMT
• Title: Extracting and categorising the reactions to COVID-19 by the South African public -- A social media study
• Authors: Vukosi Marivate, Avashlin Moodley, Athandiwe Saba
• Abstract summary: Social Media can be used to extract discussion topics during a disaster. With the COVID-19 pandemic impact on South Africa, we need to understand how the law and regulation promulgated by the government contrasts with discussion topics social media users have been engaging in.
• Score: 1.4826753449041337
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Social Media can be used to extract discussion topics during a disaster. With the COVID-19 pandemic impact on South Africa, we need to understand how the law and regulation promulgated by the government in response to the pandemic contrasts with discussion topics social media users have been engaging in. In this work, we expand on traditional media analysis by using Social Media discussions driven by or directed to South African government officials. We find topics that are similar as well as different in some cases. The findings can inform further study into social media during disaster settings in South Africa and beyond. This paper sets a framework for future analysis in understanding the opinions of the public during a pandemic and how these opinions can be distilled [in a semi-automated approach] to inform government communication in the future.

Related papers

• Large language models for sentiment analysis of newspaper articles during COVID-19: The Guardian [0.16777183511743468]
  This study provides a sentiment analysis of The Guardian newspaper during various stages of COVID-19. During the early pandemic stages, public sentiment prioritised urgent crisis response, later shifting focus to addressing the impact on health and the economy. Results indicate that during the early pandemic stages, public sentiment prioritised urgent crisis response, later shifting focus to addressing the impact on health and the economy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-20T07:10:52Z)
• Understanding Divergent Framing of the Supreme Court Controversies: Social Media vs. News Outlets [56.67097829383139]
  We focus on the nuanced distinctions in framing of social media and traditional media outlets concerning a series of U.S. Supreme Court rulings. We observe significant polarization in the news media's treatment of affirmative action and abortion rights, whereas the topic of student loans tends to exhibit a greater degree of consensus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T06:40:21Z)
• Measuring COVID-19 Related Media Consumption on Twitter [2.746705315038595]
  Social media platforms have provided essential updates regarding the pandemic. Online communications with media outlets remain unexplored on an international scale. This thesis presents the first-of-its-kind study on media consumption on COVID-19 across countries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-16T04:01:45Z)
• Investigation of how social media influenced the endsars protests in Lagos, Nigeria [0.0]
  The study was necessary given the persistent call by governments for the strict regulation of social medium platforms. This is given governments' claim that social media is being misused. The study, however, reveals that social media use is determined by users' social experiences, including those caused by governments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-09T17:34:55Z)
• The Quest for Development: When Social Media-Brokered Political Power Encounters Political 'Flak Jackets' [0.0]
  Social media provides an extended space for collective action, as netizens leverage it as a tool for claim-making and for demanding the dividends of governance. Political regimes often greet expanding use of social media with censorship, which netizens often have to contend with. This research is conducted on the basis of key informant interviews with voices against social media censorship in Nigeria since the inception of Nigeria's ruling government in 2015.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-22T14:45:22Z)
• ExcavatorCovid: Extracting Events and Relations from Text Corpora for Temporal and Causal Analysis for COVID-19 [63.72766553648224]
  ExcavatorCovid is a machine reading system that ingests open-source text documents. It extracts COVID19 related events and relations between them, and builds a Temporal and Causal Analysis Graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-05T01:18:46Z)
• Automatic Monitoring Social Dynamics During Big Incidences: A Case Study of COVID-19 in Bangladesh [0.26651200086513094]
  This study analyzed a large set of Bangladeshi newspaper data related to CO-19 pandemic. This analysis will help the government and other organizations to figure out the challenges that have arisen in society due to this pandemic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-24T07:46:17Z)
• Country Image in COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of China [79.17323278601869]
  Country image has a profound influence on international relations and economic development. In the worldwide outbreak of COVID-19, countries and their people display different reactions. In this study, we take China as a specific and typical case and investigate its image with aspect-based sentiment analysis on a large-scale Twitter dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-12T15:54:51Z)
• Analyzing COVID-19 on Online Social Media: Trends, Sentiments and Emotions [44.92240076313168]
  We analyze the affective trajectories of the American people and the Chinese people based on Twitter and Weibo posts between January 20th, 2020 and May 11th 2020. By contrasting two very different countries, China and the Unites States, we reveal sharp differences in people's views on COVID-19 in different cultures. Our study provides a computational approach to unveiling public emotions and concerns on the pandemic in real-time, which would potentially help policy-makers better understand people's need and thus make optimal policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-29T09:24:38Z)
• The Ivory Tower Lost: How College Students Respond Differently than the General Public to the COVID-19 Pandemic [66.80677233314002]
  Pandemic of the novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has presented governments with ultimate challenges. In the United States, the country with the highest confirmed COVID-19 infection cases, a nationwide social distancing protocol has been implemented by the President. This paper aims to discover the social implications of this unprecedented disruption in our interactive society by mining people's opinions on social media.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-21T13:02:38Z)
• Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
  We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms. We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features. We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.