Higher-order Logic as Lingua Franca -- Integrating Argumentative Discourse and Deep Logical Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2007.01019v1
• Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 11:07:53 GMT
• Title: Higher-order Logic as Lingua Franca -- Integrating Argumentative Discourse and Deep Logical Analysis
• Authors: David Fuenmayor and Christoph Benzm\"uller
• Abstract summary: We present an approach towards the deep, pluralistic logical analysis of argumentative discourse. We use state-of-the-art automated reasoning technology for classical higher-order logic.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We present an approach towards the deep, pluralistic logical analysis of argumentative discourse that benefits from the application of state-of-the-art automated reasoning technology for classical higher-order logic. Thanks to its expressivity this logic can adopt the status of a uniform \textit{lingua franca} allowing the encoding of both formalized arguments (their deep logical structure) and dialectical interactions (their attack and support relations). We illustrate this by analyzing an excerpt from an argumentative debate on climate engineering. Another, novel contribution concerns the definition of abstract, language-theoretical foundations for the characterization and assessment of shallow semantical embeddings (SSEs) of non-classical logics in classical higher-order logic, which constitute a pillar stone of our approach. The novel perspective we draw enables more concise and more elegant characterizations of semantical embeddings of logics and logic combinations, which is demonstrated with several examples.

Related papers

• An Encoding of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks into Higher-Order Logic [57.24311218570012]
  This approach allows for the computer-assisted analysis of abstract dialectical frameworks. Exemplary applications include the formal analysis and verification of meta-theoretical properties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-08T09:32:26Z)
• A Unifying Framework for Learning Argumentation Semantics [50.69905074548764]
  We present a novel framework, which uses an Inductive Logic Programming approach to learn the acceptability semantics for several abstract and structured argumentation frameworks in an interpretable way. Our framework outperforms existing argumentation solvers, thus opening up new future research directions in the area of formal argumentation and human-machine dialogues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-18T20:18:05Z)
• Modeling Hierarchical Reasoning Chains by Linking Discourse Units and Key Phrases for Reading Comprehension [80.99865844249106]
  We propose a holistic graph network (HGN) which deals with context at both discourse level and word level, as the basis for logical reasoning. Specifically, node-level and type-level relations, which can be interpreted as bridges in the reasoning process, are modeled by a hierarchical interaction mechanism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-21T07:34:27Z)
• Discourse-Aware Graph Networks for Textual Logical Reasoning [142.0097357999134]
  Passage-level logical relations represent entailment or contradiction between propositional units (e.g., a concluding sentence) We propose logic structural-constraint modeling to solve the logical reasoning QA and introduce discourse-aware graph networks (DAGNs) The networks first construct logic graphs leveraging in-line discourse connectives and generic logic theories, then learn logic representations by end-to-end evolving the logic relations with an edge-reasoning mechanism and updating the graph features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-04T14:38:49Z)
• How to Agree to Disagree: Managing Ontological Perspectives using Standpoint Logic [2.9005223064604073]
  Standpoint Logic is a simple, yet versatile multi-modal logic add-on'' for existing KR languages. We provide a polytime translation into the standpoint-free version of First-Order Standpoint Logic. We then establish a similar translation for the very expressive description logic SROIQb_s underlying the OWL 2 DL language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-14T12:29:08Z)
• A Formalisation of Abstract Argumentation in Higher-Order Logic [77.34726150561087]
  We present an approach for representing abstract argumentation frameworks based on an encoding into classical higher-order logic. This provides a uniform framework for computer-assisted assessment of abstract argumentation frameworks using interactive and automated reasoning tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-18T10:45:59Z)
• Logic-Driven Context Extension and Data Augmentation for Logical Reasoning of Text [65.24325614642223]
  We propose to understand logical symbols and expressions in the text to arrive at the answer. Based on such logical information, we put forward a context extension framework and a data augmentation algorithm. Our method achieves the state-of-the-art performance, and both logic-driven context extension framework and data augmentation algorithm can help improve the accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-08T10:09:36Z)
• Public Announcement Logic in HOL [0.0]
  shallow semantical embedding for public announcement logic with relativized common knowledge is presented. This embedding enables the first-time automation of this logic with off-the-shelf theorem provers for classical higher-order logic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-02T06:46:02Z)
• Logical Semantics, Dialogical Argumentation, and Textual Entailment [0.0]
  We introduce a new dialogical system for first order classical logic which is close to natural language argumentation. We prove its completeness with respect to usual classical validity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-17T08:04:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.