Evaluating Uncertainty Estimation Methods on 3D Semantic Segmentation of Point Clouds

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2007.01787v1
• Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 16:22:34 GMT
• Title: Evaluating Uncertainty Estimation Methods on 3D Semantic Segmentation of Point Clouds
• Authors: Swaroop Bhandary K and Nico Hochgeschwender and Paul Pl\"oger and Frank Kirchner and Matias Valdenegro-Toro
• Abstract summary: We evaluate three uncertainty quantification methods namely Deep Ensembles, MC-Dropout and MC-DropConnect on the DarkNet21Seg 3D semantic segmentation model. We find that Deep Ensembles outperforms other methods in both performance and uncertainty metrics.
• Score: 9.957957463532738
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Deep learning models are extensively used in various safety critical applications. Hence these models along with being accurate need to be highly reliable. One way of achieving this is by quantifying uncertainty. Bayesian methods for UQ have been extensively studied for Deep Learning models applied on images but have been less explored for 3D modalities such as point clouds often used for Robots and Autonomous Systems. In this work, we evaluate three uncertainty quantification methods namely Deep Ensembles, MC-Dropout and MC-DropConnect on the DarkNet21Seg 3D semantic segmentation model and comprehensively analyze the impact of various parameters such as number of models in ensembles or forward passes, and drop probability values, on task performance and uncertainty estimate quality. We find that Deep Ensembles outperforms other methods in both performance and uncertainty metrics. Deep ensembles outperform other methods by a margin of 2.4% in terms of mIOU, 1.3% in terms of accuracy, while providing reliable uncertainty for decision making.

Related papers

• Deep Modeling of Non-Gaussian Aleatoric Uncertainty [4.969887562291159]
  Deep learning offers promising new ways to accurately model aleatoric uncertainty in robotic estimation systems. In this study, we formulate and evaluate three fundamental deep learning approaches for conditional probability density modeling. Our results show that these deep learning methods can accurately capture complex uncertainty patterns, highlighting their potential for improving the reliability and robustness of estimation systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T22:13:17Z)
• Calib3D: Calibrating Model Preferences for Reliable 3D Scene Understanding [55.32861154245772]
  Calib3D is a pioneering effort to benchmark and scrutinize the reliability of 3D scene understanding models. We evaluate 28 state-of-the-art models across 10 diverse 3D datasets. We introduce DeptS, a novel depth-aware scaling approach aimed at enhancing 3D model calibration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-25T17:59:59Z)
• Measuring and Modeling Uncertainty Degree for Monocular Depth Estimation [50.920911532133154]
  The intrinsic ill-posedness and ordinal-sensitive nature of monocular depth estimation (MDE) models pose major challenges to the estimation of uncertainty degree. We propose to model the uncertainty of MDE models from the perspective of the inherent probability distributions. By simply introducing additional training regularization terms, our model, with surprisingly simple formations and without requiring extra modules or multiple inferences, can provide uncertainty estimations with state-of-the-art reliability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-19T12:11:15Z)
• Uncertainty-Aware AB3DMOT by Variational 3D Object Detection [74.8441634948334]
  Uncertainty estimation is an effective tool to provide statistically accurate predictions. In this paper, we propose a Variational Neural Network-based TANet 3D object detector to generate 3D object detections with uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-12T14:30:03Z)
• Reliability-Aware Prediction via Uncertainty Learning for Person Image Retrieval [51.83967175585896]
  UAL aims at providing reliability-aware predictions by considering data uncertainty and model uncertainty simultaneously. Data uncertainty captures the noise" inherent in the sample, while model uncertainty depicts the model's confidence in the sample's prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-24T17:53:20Z)
• Mixed Precision Quantization to Tackle Gradient Leakage Attacks in Federated Learning [1.7205106391379026]
  Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative model building among a large number of participants without the need for explicit data sharing. This approach shows vulnerabilities when privacy inference attacks are applied to it. In particular, in the event of a gradient leakage attack, which has a higher success rate in retrieving sensitive data from the model gradients, FL models are at higher risk due to the presence of communication in their inherent architecture.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-22T04:24:32Z)
• BayesCap: Bayesian Identity Cap for Calibrated Uncertainty in Frozen Neural Networks [50.15201777970128]
  We propose BayesCap that learns a Bayesian identity mapping for the frozen model, allowing uncertainty estimation. BayesCap is a memory-efficient method that can be trained on a small fraction of the original dataset. We show the efficacy of our method on a wide variety of tasks with a diverse set of architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-14T12:50:09Z)
• Fast Uncertainty Quantification for Deep Object Pose Estimation [91.09217713805337]
  Deep learning-based object pose estimators are often unreliable and overconfident. In this work, we propose a simple, efficient, and plug-and-play UQ method for 6-DoF object pose estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-16T06:51:55Z)
• Uncertainty Estimation for End-To-End Learned Dense Stereo Matching via Probabilistic Deep Learning [0.0]
  A novel probabilistic neural network is presented for the task of joint depth and uncertainty estimation from epipolar rectified stereo image pairs. The network learns a probability distribution from which parameters are sampled for every prediction. The quality of the estimated depth and uncertainty information is assessed in an extensive evaluation on three different datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-10T11:27:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.