On the Social and Technical Challenges of Web Search Autosuggestion Moderation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2007.05039v1
• Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 19:22:00 GMT
• Title: On the Social and Technical Challenges of Web Search Autosuggestion Moderation
• Authors: Timothy J. Hazen and Alexandra Olteanu and Gabriella Kazai and Fernando Diaz and Michael Golebiewski
• Abstract summary: Autosuggestions are typically generated by machine learning (ML) systems trained on a corpus of search logs and document representations. While current search engines have become increasingly proficient at suppressing such problematic suggestions, there are still persistent issues that remain. We discuss several dimensions of problematic suggestions, difficult issues along the pipeline, and why our discussion applies to the increasing number of applications beyond web search.
• Score: 118.47867428272878
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Past research shows that users benefit from systems that support them in their writing and exploration tasks. The autosuggestion feature of Web search engines is an example of such a system: It helps users in formulating their queries by offering a list of suggestions as they type. Autosuggestions are typically generated by machine learning (ML) systems trained on a corpus of search logs and document representations. Such automated methods can become prone to issues that result in problematic suggestions that are biased, racist, sexist or in other ways inappropriate. While current search engines have become increasingly proficient at suppressing such problematic suggestions, there are still persistent issues that remain. In this paper, we reflect on past efforts and on why certain issues still linger by covering explored solutions along a prototypical pipeline for identifying, detecting, and addressing problematic autosuggestions. To showcase their complexity, we discuss several dimensions of problematic suggestions, difficult issues along the pipeline, and why our discussion applies to the increasing number of applications beyond web search that implement similar textual suggestion features. By outlining persistent social and technical challenges in moderating web search suggestions, we provide a renewed call for action.

Related papers

• A Survey of Generative Search and Recommendation in the Era of Large Language Models [125.26354486027408]
  generative search (retrieval) and recommendation aims to address the matching problem in a generative manner. Superintelligent generative large language models have sparked a new paradigm in search and recommendation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-25T17:58:17Z)
• Enhancing Mobile "How-to" Queries with Automated Search Results Verification and Reranking [4.521071819941574]
  This paper introduces a novel approach to improving the accuracy and relevance of online technical support search results. We developed the first solution that allows an AI agent to interpret and execute step-by-step instructions in the search results in a controlled Android environment. The results demonstrate a significant improvement in the quality and reliability of the top-ranked results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-13T00:20:09Z)
• Evaluating Robustness of Generative Search Engine on Adversarial Factual Questions [89.35345649303451]
  Generative search engines have the potential to transform how people seek information online. But generated responses from existing large language models (LLMs)-backed generative search engines may not always be accurate. Retrieval-augmented generation exacerbates safety concerns, since adversaries may successfully evade the entire system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-25T11:22:19Z)
• Large Search Model: Redefining Search Stack in the Era of LLMs [63.503320030117145]
  We introduce a novel conceptual framework called large search model, which redefines the conventional search stack by unifying search tasks with one large language model (LLM) All tasks are formulated as autoregressive text generation problems, allowing for the customization of tasks through the use of natural language prompts. This proposed framework capitalizes on the strong language understanding and reasoning capabilities of LLMs, offering the potential to enhance search result quality while simultaneously simplifying the existing cumbersome search stack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T05:52:09Z)
• Social Commonsense-Guided Search Query Generation for Open-Domain Knowledge-Powered Conversations [66.16863141262506]
  We present a novel approach that focuses on generating internet search queries guided by social commonsense. Our proposed framework addresses passive user interactions by integrating topic tracking, commonsense response generation and instruction-driven query generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-22T16:14:56Z)
• Integrity and Junkiness Failure Handling for Embedding-based Retrieval: A Case Study in Social Network Search [26.705196461992845]
  Embedding based retrieval has seen its usage in a variety of search applications like e-commerce, social networking search etc. In this paper, we conduct an analysis of embedding-based retrieval launched in early 2021 on our social network search engine. We define two main categories of failures introduced by it, integrity and junkiness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-18T20:53:47Z)
• Design Challenges for a Multi-Perspective Search Engine [44.48345943046946]
  We study a new perspective-oriented document retrieval paradigm. We discuss and assess the inherent natural language understanding challenges in order to achieve the goal. We use the prototype system to conduct a user survey in order to assess the utility of our paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-15T18:59:57Z)
• Exposing Query Identification for Search Transparency [69.06545074617685]
  We explore the feasibility of approximate exposing query identification (EQI) as a retrieval task by reversing the role of queries and documents in two classes of search systems. We derive an evaluation metric to measure the quality of a ranking of exposing queries, as well as conducting an empirical analysis focusing on various practical aspects of approximate EQI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-14T20:19:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.