Human $\neq$ AGI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2007.07710v1
• Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 14:06:13 GMT
• Title: Human $\neq$ AGI
• Authors: Roman V. Yampolskiy
• Abstract summary: General Intelligence (AGI) and Human-Level Artificial Intelligence (HLAI) have been used to interchangeably refer to the Holy Grail of Artificial Intelligence research. This paper argues that implicit assumption of equivalence between capabilities of AGI and HLAI appears to be unjustified, as humans are not general intelligences.
• Score: 1.370633147306388
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Terms Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and Human-Level Artificial Intelligence (HLAI) have been used interchangeably to refer to the Holy Grail of Artificial Intelligence (AI) research, creation of a machine capable of achieving goals in a wide range of environments. However, widespread implicit assumption of equivalence between capabilities of AGI and HLAI appears to be unjustified, as humans are not general intelligences. In this paper, we will prove this distinction.

Related papers

• On the consistent reasoning paradox of intelligence and optimal trust in AI: The power of 'I don't know' [79.69412622010249]
  Consistent reasoning, which lies at the core of human intelligence, is the ability to handle tasks that are equivalent. CRP asserts that consistent reasoning implies fallibility -- in particular, human-like intelligence in AI necessarily comes with human-like fallibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-05T10:06:53Z)
• Unsocial Intelligence: an Investigation of the Assumptions of AGI Discourse [1.9506923346234724]
  We argue that the meaning of human-level AI or artificial general intelligence (AGI) remains elusive and contested. We provide a taxonomy of AGI definitions, laying the ground for examining the key social, political, and ethical assumptions they make. We propose contextual, democratic, and participatory paths to imagining future forms of machine intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-23T23:37:51Z)
• The Generative AI Paradox: "What It Can Create, It May Not Understand" [81.89252713236746]
  Recent wave of generative AI has sparked excitement and concern over potentially superhuman levels of artificial intelligence. At the same time, models still show basic errors in understanding that would not be expected even in non-expert humans. This presents us with an apparent paradox: how do we reconcile seemingly superhuman capabilities with the persistence of errors that few humans would make?
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T18:07:07Z)
• The Embeddings World and Artificial General Intelligence [2.28438857884398]
  We argue that pre-trained embeddings play a key role in building this intelligent world. We discuss how pre-trained embeddings facilitate achieving several characteristics of human-level intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-14T11:56:30Z)
• The Turing Trap: The Promise & Peril of Human-Like Artificial Intelligence [1.9143819780453073]
  The benefits of human-like artificial intelligence include soaring productivity, increased leisure, and perhaps most profoundly, a better understanding of our own minds. But not all types of AI are human-like. In fact, many of the most powerful systems are very different from humans. As machines become better substitutes for human labor, workers lose economic and political bargaining power. In contrast, when AI is focused on augmenting humans rather than mimicking them, then humans retain the power to insist on a share of the value created.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-11T21:07:17Z)
• On some Foundational Aspects of Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence [52.03866242565846]
  There is no clear definition of what is meant by Human Centered Artificial Intelligence. This paper introduces the term HCAI agent to refer to any physical or software computational agent equipped with AI components. We see the notion of HCAI agent, together with its components and functions, as a way to bridge the technical and non-technical discussions on human-centered AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-29T09:58:59Z)
• An argument for the impossibility of machine intelligence [0.0]
  We define what it is to be an agent (device) that could be the bearer of AI. We show that the mainstream definitions of intelligence' are too weak even to capture what is involved when we ascribe intelligence to an insect. We identify the properties that an AI agent would need to possess in order to be the bearer of intelligence by this definition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-20T08:54:48Z)
• A User-Centred Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Human-Robot Interaction [70.11080854486953]
  We propose a user-centred framework for XAI that focuses on its social-interactive aspect. The framework aims to provide a structure for interactive XAI solutions thought for non-expert users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-27T09:56:23Z)
• Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspective [54.80482955088197]
  We focus on six of the most crucial dimensions in achieving trustworthy AI: (i) Safety & Robustness, (ii) Non-discrimination & Fairness, (iii) Explainability, (iv) Privacy, (v) Accountability & Auditability, and (vi) Environmental Well-Being. For each dimension, we review the recent related technologies according to a taxonomy and summarize their applications in real-world systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-12T14:21:46Z)
• Watershed of Artificial Intelligence: Human Intelligence, Machine Intelligence, and Biological Intelligence [0.2580765958706853]
  This article reviews the Once Learning mechanism that was proposed 23 years ago and the subsequent successes of One-shot Learning in image classification and You Only Look Once-YOLO in objective detection. The proposal is that AI should be clearly divided into the following categories: Artificial Human Intelligence (AHI), Artificial Machine Intelligence (AMI), and Artificial Biological Intelligence (ABI)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-27T13:03:25Z)
• Future Trends for Human-AI Collaboration: A Comprehensive Taxonomy of AI/AGI Using Multiple Intelligences and Learning Styles [95.58955174499371]
  We describe various aspects of multiple human intelligences and learning styles, which may impact on a variety of AI problem domains. Future AI systems will be able not only to communicate with human users and each other, but also to efficiently exchange knowledge and wisdom.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-07T21:00:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.