Institutional Grammar 2.0 Codebook

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.08937v5
• Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2024 20:14:36 GMT
• Title: Institutional Grammar 2.0 Codebook
• Authors: Christopher K. Frantz, Saba N. Siddiki,
• Abstract summary: This codebook provides coding guidelines for a revised version of the Institutional Grammar, the Institutional Grammar 2.0 (IG 2.0) IG 2.0 is a specification that aims at facilitating the encoding of policy to meet varying analytical objectives.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The Grammar of Institutions, or Institutional Grammar, is an established approach to encode policy information in terms of institutional statements based on a set of pre-defined syntactic components. This codebook provides coding guidelines for a revised version of the Institutional Grammar, the Institutional Grammar 2.0 (IG 2.0). IG 2.0 is a specification that aims at facilitating the encoding of policy to meet varying analytical objectives. To this end, it revises the grammar with respect to comprehensiveness, flexibility, and specificity by offering multiple levels of expressiveness (IG Core, IG Extended, IG Logico). In addition to the encoding of regulative statements, it further introduces the encoding of constitutive institutional statements, as well as statements that exhibit both constitutive and regulative characteristics. Introducing those aspects, the codebook initially covers fundamental concepts of IG 2.0, before providing an overview of pre-coding steps relevant for document preparation. Detailed coding guidelines are provided for both regulative and constitutive statements across all levels of expressiveness, along with the encoding guidelines for statements of mixed form -- hybrid and polymorphic institutional statements. The document further provides an overview of taxonomies used in the encoding process and referred to throughout the codebook. The codebook concludes with a summary and discussion of relevant considerations to facilitate the coding process. An initial Reader's Guide helps the reader tailor the content to her interest. Note that this codebook specifically focuses on operational aspects of IG 2.0 in the context of policy coding. Links to additional resources such as the underlying scientific literature (that offers a comprehensive treatment of the underlying theoretical concepts) are referred to in the DOI and the concluding section of the codebook.

Related papers

• IFEvalCode: Controlled Code Generation [69.28317223249358]
  The paper introduces forward and backward constraints generation to improve the instruction-following capabilities of Code LLMs.<n>The authors present IFEvalCode, a multilingual benchmark comprising 1.6K test samples across seven programming languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-30T08:08:48Z)
• Compliance-to-Code: Enhancing Financial Compliance Checking via Code Generation [36.166087396386445]
  We present Compliance-to-Code, the first large-scale Chinese dataset dedicated to financial regulatory compliance.<n> Covering 1,159 annotated clauses from 361 regulations across ten categories, each clause is modularly structured with four logical elements-subject, condition, constraint, and contextual information-along with regulation relations.<n>We provide deterministic Python code mappings, detailed code reasoning, and code explanations to facilitate automated auditing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T10:38:32Z)
• IG Parser: A Software Package for the Encoding of Institutional Statements using the Institutional Grammar [0.0]
  The IG employs a distinctive syntax that ensures rigorous encoding of natural language.<n>The conceptual core of the IG is an associated syntax, IG Script.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T17:33:15Z)
• Learnable Item Tokenization for Generative Recommendation [78.30417863309061]
  We propose LETTER (a LEarnable Tokenizer for generaTivE Recommendation), which integrates hierarchical semantics, collaborative signals, and code assignment diversity. LETTER incorporates Residual Quantized VAE for semantic regularization, a contrastive alignment loss for collaborative regularization, and a diversity loss to mitigate code assignment bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-12T15:49:38Z)
• A Novel ICD Coding Method Based on Associated and Hierarchical Code Description Distillation [6.524062529847299]
  ICD coding is a challenging multilabel text classification problem due to noisy medical document inputs. Recent advancements in automated ICD coding have enhanced performance by integrating additional data and knowledge bases with the encoding of medical notes and codes. We propose a novel framework based on associated and hierarchical code description distillation (AHDD) for better code representation learning and avoidance of improper code assignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-17T07:26:23Z)
• DECIDER: A Dual-System Rule-Controllable Decoding Framework for Language Generation [57.07295906718989]
  Constrained decoding approaches aim to control the meaning or style of text generated by a Pre-trained Language Model (PLM) using specific target words during inference. We propose a novel decoding framework, DECIDER, which enables us to program rules on how we complete tasks to control a PLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-04T11:49:08Z)
• Language Agnostic Code Embeddings [61.84835551549612]
  We focus on the cross-lingual capabilities of code embeddings across different programming languages. Code embeddings comprise two distinct components: one deeply tied to the nuances and syntax of a specific language, and the other remaining agnostic to these details. We show that when we isolate and eliminate this language-specific component, we witness significant improvements in downstream code retrieval tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-25T17:34:52Z)
• Development of the ChatGPT, Generative Artificial Intelligence and Natural Large Language Models for Accountable Reporting and Use (CANGARU) Guidelines [0.33249867230903685]
  CANGARU aims to foster a cross-disciplinary global consensus on the ethical use, disclosure, and proper reporting of GAI/GPT/LLM technologies in academia. The present protocol consists of an ongoing systematic review of GAI/GPT/LLM applications to understand the linked ideas, findings, and reporting standards in scholarly research, and to formulate guidelines for its use and disclosure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-18T05:12:52Z)
• An automated method for the ontological representation of security directives [0.0]
  The paper frames this problem in the context of recent European security directives. The complexity of their language is here thwarted by the extraction of the relevant information, namely of the parts of speech from each clause. The method is showcased on a practical problem, namely to derive an ontology representing the NIS 2 directive, which is the peak of cybersecurity prescripts at the European level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-30T09:04:47Z)
• A Syntax-Guided Multi-Task Learning Approach for Turducken-Style Code Generation [19.489202790935902]
  We propose a syntax-guided multi-task learning approach TurduckenGen. Specifically, we first explicitly append the type information to the code tokens to capture the representation of syntactic constraints. Then we formalize code generation with syntactic constraint representation as an auxiliary task to enable the model to learn the syntactic constraints of the code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-09T06:22:07Z)
• Language Model Decoding as Likelihood-Utility Alignment [54.70547032876017]
  We introduce a taxonomy that groups decoding strategies based on their implicit assumptions about how well the model's likelihood is aligned with the task-specific notion of utility. Specifically, by analyzing the correlation between the likelihood and the utility of predictions across a diverse set of tasks, we provide the first empirical evidence supporting the proposed taxonomy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-13T17:55:51Z)
• O-Dang! The Ontology of Dangerous Speech Messages [53.15616413153125]
  We present O-Dang!: The Ontology of Dangerous Speech Messages, a systematic and interoperable Knowledge Graph (KG) O-Dang! is designed to gather and organize Italian datasets into a structured KG, according to the principles shared within the Linguistic Linked Open Data community. It provides a model for encoding both gold standard and single-annotator labels in the KG.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-13T11:50:05Z)
• Semantic Construction Grammar: Bridging the NL / Logic Divide [3.245535754791156]
  We discuss Semantic Construction Grammar (SCG), a system developed to facilitate translation between natural language and logical representations. SCG is designed to support a variety of different methods of representation, ranging from those that are fairly close to the NL structure to those that are quite different from the NL structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-10T00:02:40Z)
• Treebanking User-Generated Content: a UD Based Overview of Guidelines, Corpora and Unified Recommendations [58.50167394354305]
  This article presents a discussion on the main linguistic phenomena which cause difficulties in the analysis of user-generated texts found on the web and in social media. It proposes a set of tentative UD-based annotation guidelines to promote consistent treatment of the particular phenomena found in these types of texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-03T23:34:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.