Detecting and Classifying Malevolent Dialogue Responses: Taxonomy, Data
and Methodology
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.09706v1
- Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 22:43:27 GMT
- Title: Detecting and Classifying Malevolent Dialogue Responses: Taxonomy, Data
and Methodology
- Authors: Yangjun Zhang, Pengjie Ren, Maarten de Rijke
- Abstract summary: Corpus-based conversational interfaces are able to generate more diverse and natural responses than template-based or retrieval-based agents.
With their increased generative capacity of corpusbased conversational agents comes the need to classify and filter out malevolent responses.
Previous studies on the topic of recognizing and classifying inappropriate content are mostly focused on a certain category of malevolence.
- Score: 68.8836704199096
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Conversational interfaces are increasingly popular as a way of connecting
people to information. Corpus-based conversational interfaces are able to
generate more diverse and natural responses than template-based or
retrieval-based agents. With their increased generative capacity of corpusbased
conversational agents comes the need to classify and filter out malevolent
responses that are inappropriate in terms of content and dialogue acts.
Previous studies on the topic of recognizing and classifying inappropriate
content are mostly focused on a certain category of malevolence or on single
sentences instead of an entire dialogue. In this paper, we define the task of
Malevolent Dialogue Response Detection and Classification (MDRDC). We make
three contributions to advance research on this task. First, we present a
Hierarchical Malevolent Dialogue Taxonomy (HMDT). Second, we create a labelled
multi-turn dialogue dataset and formulate the MDRDC task as a hierarchical
classification task over this taxonomy. Third, we apply stateof-the-art text
classification methods to the MDRDC task and report on extensive experiments
aimed at assessing the performance of these approaches.
Related papers
- Interactive Text-to-Image Retrieval with Large Language Models: A Plug-and-Play Approach [33.231639257323536]
In this paper, we address the issue of dialogue-form context query within the interactive text-to-image retrieval task.
By reformulating the dialogue-form context, we eliminate the necessity of fine-tuning a retrieval model on existing visual dialogue data.
We construct the LLM questioner to generate non-redundant questions about the attributes of the target image.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-05T16:09:01Z) - SSP: Self-Supervised Post-training for Conversational Search [63.28684982954115]
We propose fullmodel (model) which is a new post-training paradigm with three self-supervised tasks to efficiently initialize the conversational search model.
To verify the effectiveness of our proposed method, we apply the conversational encoder post-trained by model on the conversational search task using two benchmark datasets: CAsT-19 and CAsT-20.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-02T13:36:36Z) - SuperDialseg: A Large-scale Dataset for Supervised Dialogue Segmentation [55.82577086422923]
We provide a feasible definition of dialogue segmentation points with the help of document-grounded dialogues.
We release a large-scale supervised dataset called SuperDialseg, containing 9,478 dialogues.
We also provide a benchmark including 18 models across five categories for the dialogue segmentation task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-15T06:08:01Z) - FCC: Fusing Conversation History and Candidate Provenance for Contextual
Response Ranking in Dialogue Systems [53.89014188309486]
We present a flexible neural framework that can integrate contextual information from multiple channels.
We evaluate our model on the MSDialog dataset widely used for evaluating conversational response ranking tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-31T23:58:28Z) - PK-ICR: Persona-Knowledge Interactive Context Retrieval for Grounded Dialogue [21.266410719325208]
Persona and Knowledge Dual Context Identification is a task to identify persona and knowledge jointly for a given dialogue.
We develop a novel grounding retrieval method that utilizes all contexts of dialogue simultaneously.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-13T20:27:26Z) - Unsupervised Summarization for Chat Logs with Topic-Oriented Ranking and
Context-Aware Auto-Encoders [59.038157066874255]
We propose a novel framework called RankAE to perform chat summarization without employing manually labeled data.
RankAE consists of a topic-oriented ranking strategy that selects topic utterances according to centrality and diversity simultaneously.
A denoising auto-encoder is designed to generate succinct but context-informative summaries based on the selected utterances.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-14T07:31:17Z) - Multi-View Sequence-to-Sequence Models with Conversational Structure for
Abstractive Dialogue Summarization [72.54873655114844]
Text summarization is one of the most challenging and interesting problems in NLP.
This work proposes a multi-view sequence-to-sequence model by first extracting conversational structures of unstructured daily chats from different views to represent conversations.
Experiments on a large-scale dialogue summarization corpus demonstrated that our methods significantly outperformed previous state-of-the-art models via both automatic evaluations and human judgment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-04T20:12:44Z) - Contextual Dialogue Act Classification for Open-Domain Conversational
Agents [10.576497782941697]
Classifying the general intent of the user utterance in a conversation, also known as Dialogue Act (DA), is a key step in Natural Language Understanding (NLU) for conversational agents.
We propose CDAC (Contextual Dialogue Act), a simple yet effective deep learning approach for contextual dialogue act classification.
We use transfer learning to adapt models trained on human-human conversations to predict dialogue acts in human-machine dialogues.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-28T06:48:10Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.