Do Explicit Alignments Robustly Improve Multilingual Encoders?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.02537v1
• Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2020 07:43:17 GMT
• Title: Do Explicit Alignments Robustly Improve Multilingual Encoders?
• Authors: Shijie Wu, Mark Dredze
• Abstract summary: multilingual encoders can effectively learn cross-lingual representation. Explicit alignment objectives based on bitexts like Europarl or MultiUN have been shown to further improve these representations. We propose a new contrastive alignment objective that can better utilize such signal.
• Score: 22.954688396858085
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Multilingual BERT (mBERT), XLM-RoBERTa (XLMR) and other unsupervised multilingual encoders can effectively learn cross-lingual representation. Explicit alignment objectives based on bitexts like Europarl or MultiUN have been shown to further improve these representations. However, word-level alignments are often suboptimal and such bitexts are unavailable for many languages. In this paper, we propose a new contrastive alignment objective that can better utilize such signal, and examine whether these previous alignment methods can be adapted to noisier sources of aligned data: a randomly sampled 1 million pair subset of the OPUS collection. Additionally, rather than report results on a single dataset with a single model run, we report the mean and standard derivation of multiple runs with different seeds, on four datasets and tasks. Our more extensive analysis finds that, while our new objective outperforms previous work, overall these methods do not improve performance with a more robust evaluation framework. Furthermore, the gains from using a better underlying model eclipse any benefits from alignment training. These negative results dictate more care in evaluating these methods and suggest limitations in applying explicit alignment objectives.

Related papers

• P-MMEval: A Parallel Multilingual Multitask Benchmark for Consistent Evaluation of LLMs [84.24644520272835]
  Large language models (LLMs) showcase varied multilingual capabilities across tasks like translation, code generation, and reasoning. Previous assessments often limited their scope to fundamental natural language processing (NLP) or isolated capability-specific tasks. We present a pipeline for selecting available and reasonable benchmarks from massive ones, addressing the oversight in previous work regarding the utility of these benchmarks. We introduce P-MMEval, a large-scale benchmark covering effective fundamental and capability-specialized datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-14T01:29:36Z)
• How Transliterations Improve Crosslingual Alignment [48.929677368744606]
  Recent studies have shown that post-aligning multilingual pretrained language models (mPLMs) using alignment objectives can improve crosslingual alignment. This paper attempts to explicitly evaluate the crosslingual alignment and identify the key elements in transliteration-based approaches that contribute to better performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-25T20:05:45Z)
• Optimal Transport Posterior Alignment for Cross-lingual Semantic Parsing [68.47787275021567]
  Cross-lingual semantic parsing transfers parsing capability from a high-resource language (e.g., English) to low-resource languages with scarce training data. We propose a new approach to cross-lingual semantic parsing by explicitly minimizing cross-lingual divergence between latent variables using Optimal Transport.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-09T04:52:31Z)
• Multilingual Sentence Transformer as A Multilingual Word Aligner [15.689680887384847]
  We investigate whether multilingual sentence Transformer LaBSE is a strong multilingual word aligner. Experiment results on seven language pairs show that our best aligner outperforms previous state-of-the-art models of all varieties. Our aligner supports different language pairs in a single model, and even achieves new state-of-the-art on zero-shot language pairs that does not appear in the finetuning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-28T09:28:55Z)
• Ensemble Transfer Learning for Multilingual Coreference Resolution [60.409789753164944]
  A problem that frequently occurs when working with a non-English language is the scarcity of annotated training data. We design a simple but effective ensemble-based framework that combines various transfer learning techniques. We also propose a low-cost TL method that bootstraps coreference resolution models by utilizing Wikipedia anchor texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-22T18:22:55Z)
• On Cross-Lingual Retrieval with Multilingual Text Encoders [51.60862829942932]
  We study the suitability of state-of-the-art multilingual encoders for cross-lingual document and sentence retrieval tasks. We benchmark their performance in unsupervised ad-hoc sentence- and document-level CLIR experiments. We evaluate multilingual encoders fine-tuned in a supervised fashion (i.e., we learn to rank) on English relevance data in a series of zero-shot language and domain transfer CLIR experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-21T08:10:27Z)
• Distributionally Robust Multilingual Machine Translation [94.51866646879337]
  We propose a new learning objective for Multilingual neural machine translation (MNMT) based on distributionally robust optimization. We show how to practically optimize this objective for large translation corpora using an iterated best response scheme. Our method consistently outperforms strong baseline methods in terms of average and per-language performance under both many-to-one and one-to-many translation settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-09T03:48:35Z)
• Explicit Alignment Objectives for Multilingual Bidirectional Encoders [111.65322283420805]
  We present a new method for learning multilingual encoders, AMBER (Aligned Multilingual Bi-directional EncodeR) AMBER is trained on additional parallel data using two explicit alignment objectives that align the multilingual representations at different granularities. Experimental results show that AMBER obtains gains of up to 1.1 average F1 score on sequence tagging and up to 27.3 average accuracy on retrieval over the XLMR-large model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T18:34:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.