Intrinsic motivation in virtual assistant interaction for fostering spontaneous interactions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.06416v1
• Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 14:23:57 GMT
• Title: Intrinsic motivation in virtual assistant interaction for fostering spontaneous interactions
• Authors: Chang Li and Hideyoshi Yanagisawa
• Abstract summary: This study aims to cover intrinsic motivation by taking an affective-engineering approach. A novel motivation model is proposed, in which intrinsic motivation is affected by two factors: expectation of capability and uncertainty. Results of the first experiment showed that high expectation engenders more intrinsically motivated interaction compared with low expectation.
• Score: 3.420509295457138
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: With the growing utility of today's conversational virtual assistants, the importance of user motivation in human-AI interaction is becoming more obvious. However, previous studies in this and related fields, such as human-computer interaction and human-robot interaction, scarcely discussed intrinsic motivation and its affecting factors. Those studies either treated motivation as an inseparable concept or focused on non-intrinsic motivation. The current study aims to cover intrinsic motivation by taking an affective-engineering approach. A novel motivation model is proposed, in which intrinsic motivation is affected by two factors that derive from user interactions with virtual assistants: expectation of capability and uncertainty. Experiments are conducted where these two factors are manipulated by making participants believe they are interacting with the smart speaker "Amazon Echo". Intrinsic motivation is measured both by using questionnaires and by covertly monitoring a five-minute free-choice period in the experimenter's absence, during which the participants could decide for themselves whether to interact with the virtual assistants. Results of the first experiment showed that high expectation engenders more intrinsically motivated interaction compared with low expectation. The results also suggested suppressive effects by uncertainty on intrinsic motivation, though we had not hypothesized before experiments. We then revised our hypothetical model of action selection accordingly and conducted a verification experiment of uncertainty's effects. Results of the verification experiment showed that reducing uncertainty encourages more interactions and causes the motivation behind these interactions to shift from non-intrinsic to intrinsic.

Related papers

• The Importance of Multimodal Emotion Conditioning and Affect Consistency for Embodied Conversational Agents [12.102955731466457]
  We propose a conceptual framework that aims to increase the perception of affects by generating multimodal behaviors conditioned on a consistent driving affect. Our statistical analysis suggests that making a modality affect-inconsistent significantly decreases the perception of driving affects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-26T23:41:56Z)
• Expanding the Role of Affective Phenomena in Multimodal Interaction Research [57.069159905961214]
  We examined over 16,000 papers from selected conferences in multimodal interaction, affective computing, and natural language processing. We identify 910 affect-related papers and present our analysis of the role of affective phenomena in these papers. We find limited research on how affect and emotion predictions might be used by AI systems to enhance machine understanding of human social behaviors and cognitive states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T09:08:39Z)
• Learning Goal-based Movement via Motivational-based Models in Cognitive Mobile Robots [58.720142291102135]
  Humans have needs motivating their behavior according to intensity and context. We also create preferences associated with each action's perceived pleasure, which is susceptible to changes over time. This makes decision-making more complex, requiring learning to balance needs and preferences according to the context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-20T04:52:24Z)
• Interactive Visual Reasoning under Uncertainty [29.596555383319814]
  We devise the IVRE environment for evaluating artificial agents' reasoning ability under uncertainty. IVRE is an interactive environment featuring rich scenarios centered around Blicket detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-18T13:32:41Z)
• The world seems different in a social context: a neural network analysis of human experimental data [57.729312306803955]
  We show that it is possible to replicate human behavioral data in both individual and social task settings by modifying the precision of prior and sensory signals. An analysis of the neural activation traces of the trained networks provides evidence that information is coded in fundamentally different ways in the network in the individual and in the social conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-03T17:19:12Z)
• AGENT: A Benchmark for Core Psychological Reasoning [60.35621718321559]
  Intuitive psychology is the ability to reason about hidden mental variables that drive observable actions. Despite recent interest in machine agents that reason about other agents, it is not clear if such agents learn or hold the core psychology principles that drive human reasoning. We present a benchmark consisting of procedurally generated 3D animations, AGENT, structured around four scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-24T14:58:23Z)
• Tracking Emotions: Intrinsic Motivation Grounded on Multi-Level Prediction Error Dynamics [68.8204255655161]
  We discuss how emotions arise when differences between expected and actual rates of progress towards a goal are experienced. We present an intrinsic motivation architecture that generates behaviors towards self-generated and dynamic goals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-29T06:53:13Z)
• Studying the Effects of Cognitive Biases in Evaluation of Conversational Agents [10.248512149493443]
  We conduct a study with 77 crowdsourced workers to understand the role of cognitive biases, specifically anchoring bias, when humans are asked to evaluate the output of conversational agents. We find increased consistency in ratings across two experimental conditions may be a result of anchoring bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-18T23:52:39Z)
• Human Perception of Intrinsically Motivated Autonomy in Human-Robot Interaction [2.485182034310304]
  A challenge in using robots in human-inhabited environments is to design behavior that is engaging, yet robust to the perturbations induced by human interaction. Our idea is to imbue the robot with intrinsic motivation (IM) so that it can handle new situations and appears as a genuine social other to humans. This article presents a "robotologist" study design that allows comparing autonomously generated behaviors with each other.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-14T09:49:36Z)
• Intrinsic Motivation for Encouraging Synergistic Behavior [55.10275467562764]
  We study the role of intrinsic motivation as an exploration bias for reinforcement learning in sparse-reward synergistic tasks. Our key idea is that a good guiding principle for intrinsic motivation in synergistic tasks is to take actions which affect the world in ways that would not be achieved if the agents were acting on their own.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-12T19:34:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.