Going Paperless -- Main Challenges in EDRMS Implementation -- Case of Georgia

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.07019v1
• Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 06:37:53 GMT
• Title: Going Paperless -- Main Challenges in EDRMS Implementation -- Case of Georgia
• Authors: Teona Gelashvili
• Abstract summary: This study is to inquire Electronic Documents and Records Management Systems (EDRMS) in the context of eGovernment. The centre of the investigation is howMS could raise efficiency in public service delivery. Different ICT adoption theories and case study examples were analysed, among which the Estonian case was taken as a successful model.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: National governments are eager to incorporate information and communication technologies in their administrative agenda. Even though transformation from traditional to digital methods seem attractive, there are obstacles which come along with this change. Since countries are continuously implementing ICT-based technologies, the need for investigating the factors hindering their adoption becomes crucial. The main objective of this study is to inquire Electronic Documents and Records Management Systems (EDRMS) in the context of eGovernment. The centre of the investigation is how EDRMS could raise efficiency in public service delivery. Within the scope of this research, the associated challenges of the EDRMS implementation, possible ways to tackle those challenges and achieved benefits were analysed. For thorough examination, exploratory case study method was chosen, and the case of Georgia was investigated. For drawing conclusions and finding answers to the imposed questions qualitative approach was selected. Different ICT adoption theories and case study examples were analysed, among which the Estonian case was taken as a successful model. Empirical data collection was also an integral part of the study during which interviews with state officials, as well as experts, were conducted, and the questionnaire among civil servants was distributed. As a result of the research, the main aspects of the EDRMS implementation were evaluated, and the prospect of the possible future study was imposed.

Related papers

• Preliminary Insights on Industry Practices for Addressing Fairness Debt [4.546982900370235]
  This study explores how software professionals identify and address biases in AI systems within the software industry. Our paper presents initial evidence on addressing fairness debt and provides a foundation for developing structured guidelines to manage fairness-related issues in AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-04T04:18:42Z)
• An evidence-based methodology for human rights impact assessment (HRIA) in the development of AI data-intensive systems [49.1574468325115]
  We show that human rights already underpin the decisions in the field of data use. This work presents a methodology and a model for a Human Rights Impact Assessment (HRIA) The proposed methodology is tested in concrete case-studies to prove its feasibility and effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-30T16:27:52Z)
• Surveys Considered Harmful? Reflecting on the Use of Surveys in AI Research, Development, and Governance [21.430179253600308]
  We find that public surveys on AI topics are vulnerable to specific Western knowledge, values, and assumptions in their design. We distill provocations and questions for our community to recognize the limitations of surveys for meeting the goals of engagement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-26T22:10:49Z)
• Harnessing AI for efficient analysis of complex policy documents: a case study of Executive Order 14110 [44.99833362998488]
  Policy documents, such as legislation, regulations, and executive orders, are crucial in shaping society. This study aims to evaluate the potential of AI in streamlining policy analysis and to identify the strengths and limitations of current AI approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-10T11:19:28Z)
• Navigating the Research Landscape of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations: A Research Note and Agenda [0.0]
  This note serves as a cause for thought for scholars interested in researching Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) It covers key aspects of data retrieval, data selection criteria, issues in data reliability and validity. The agenda aims to equip scholars with the essential knowledge required to conduct nuanced and rigorous academic studies on DAOs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-28T18:29:40Z)
• Responsible AI Governance: A Systematic Literature Review [8.318630741859113]
  This paper aims to examine the existing literature on AI Governance. The focus of this study is to analyse the literature to answer key questions: WHO is accountable for AI systems' governance, WHAT elements are being governed, WHEN governance occurs within the AI development life cycle, and HOW it is executed through various mechanisms like frameworks, tools, standards, policies, or models. The findings of this study provides a foundational basis for future research and development of comprehensive governance models that align with RAI principles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-18T05:22:36Z)
• A Survey on Interpretable Cross-modal Reasoning [64.37362731950843]
  Cross-modal reasoning (CMR) has emerged as a pivotal area with applications spanning from multimedia analysis to healthcare diagnostics. This survey delves into the realm of interpretable cross-modal reasoning (I-CMR) This survey presents a comprehensive overview of the typical methods with a three-level taxonomy for I-CMR.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-05T05:06:48Z)
• Fairness in Recommender Systems: Research Landscape and Future Directions [119.67643184567623]
  We review the concepts and notions of fairness that were put forward in the area in the recent past. We present an overview of how research in this field is currently operationalized. Overall, our analysis of recent works points to certain research gaps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T08:34:25Z)
• An Uncommon Task: Participatory Design in Legal AI [64.54460979588075]
  We examine a notable yet understudied AI design process in the legal domain that took place over a decade ago. We show how an interactive simulation methodology allowed computer scientists and lawyers to become co-designers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-08T15:46:52Z)
• Scaling up Search Engine Audits: Practical Insights for Algorithm Auditing [68.8204255655161]
  We set up experiments for eight search engines with hundreds of virtual agents placed in different regions. We demonstrate the successful performance of our research infrastructure across multiple data collections. We conclude that virtual agents are a promising venue for monitoring the performance of algorithms across long periods of time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-10T15:49:58Z)
• Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOPS) Workshop White Paper [50.25428141435537]
  Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOps) is an emerging interdisciplinary field arising in the intersection between machine learning, big data, streaming analytics, and the management of IT operations. Main aim of the AIOPS workshop is to bring together researchers from both academia and industry to present their experiences, results, and work in progress in this field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-15T10:43:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.