Exploiting Context for Robustness to Label Noise in Active Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.09066v1
• Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 18:59:44 GMT
• Title: Exploiting Context for Robustness to Label Noise in Active Learning
• Authors: Sudipta Paul, Shivkumar Chandrasekaran, B.S. Manjunath, Amit K. Roy-Chowdhury
• Abstract summary: We address the problems of how a system can identify which of the queried labels are wrong and how a multi-class active learning system can be adapted to minimize the negative impact of label noise. We construct a graphical representation of the unlabeled data to encode these relationships and obtain new beliefs on the graph when noisy labels are available. This is demonstrated in three different applications: scene classification, activity classification, and document classification.
• Score: 47.341705184013804
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Several works in computer vision have demonstrated the effectiveness of active learning for adapting the recognition model when new unlabeled data becomes available. Most of these works consider that labels obtained from the annotator are correct. However, in a practical scenario, as the quality of the labels depends on the annotator, some of the labels might be wrong, which results in degraded recognition performance. In this paper, we address the problems of i) how a system can identify which of the queried labels are wrong and ii) how a multi-class active learning system can be adapted to minimize the negative impact of label noise. Towards solving the problems, we propose a noisy label filtering based learning approach where the inter-relationship (context) that is quite common in natural data is utilized to detect the wrong labels. We construct a graphical representation of the unlabeled data to encode these relationships and obtain new beliefs on the graph when noisy labels are available. Comparing the new beliefs with the prior relational information, we generate a dissimilarity score to detect the incorrect labels and update the recognition model with correct labels which result in better recognition performance. This is demonstrated in three different applications: scene classification, activity classification, and document classification.

Related papers

• Drawing the Same Bounding Box Twice? Coping Noisy Annotations in Object Detection with Repeated Labels [6.872072177648135]
  We propose a novel localization algorithm that adapts well-established ground truth estimation methods. Our algorithm also shows superior performance during training on the TexBiG dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T13:08:44Z)
• Towards Imbalanced Large Scale Multi-label Classification with Partially Annotated Labels [8.977819892091]
  Multi-label classification is a widely encountered problem in daily life, where an instance can be associated with multiple classes. In this work, we address the issue of label imbalance and investigate how to train neural networks using partial labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-31T21:50:48Z)
• Imprecise Label Learning: A Unified Framework for Learning with Various Imprecise Label Configurations [91.67511167969934]
  imprecise label learning (ILL) is a framework for the unification of learning with various imprecise label configurations. We demonstrate that ILL can seamlessly adapt to partial label learning, semi-supervised learning, noisy label learning, and, more importantly, a mixture of these settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T04:50:28Z)
• Bridging the Gap between Model Explanations in Partially Annotated Multi-label Classification [85.76130799062379]
  We study how false negative labels affect the model's explanation. We propose to boost the attribution scores of the model trained with partial labels to make its explanation resemble that of the model trained with full labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-04T14:00:59Z)
• Dist-PU: Positive-Unlabeled Learning from a Label Distribution Perspective [89.5370481649529]
  We propose a label distribution perspective for PU learning in this paper. Motivated by this, we propose to pursue the label distribution consistency between predicted and ground-truth label distributions. Experiments on three benchmark datasets validate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-06T07:38:29Z)
• Identifying Incorrect Annotations in Multi-Label Classification Data [14.94741409713251]
  We consider algorithms for finding mislabeled examples in multi-label classification datasets. We propose an extension of the Confident Learning framework to this setting, as well as a label quality score that ranks examples with label errors much higher than those which are correctly labeled.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-25T05:03:56Z)
• Harmless label noise and informative soft-labels in supervised classification [1.6752182911522517]
  Manual labelling of training examples is common practice in supervised learning. When the labelling task is of non-trivial difficulty, the supplied labels may not be equal to the ground-truth labels, and label noise is introduced into the training dataset. In particular, when classification difficulty is the only source of label errors, multiple sets of noisy labels can supply more information for the estimation of a classification rule.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-07T02:56:11Z)
• Noisy Labels Can Induce Good Representations [53.47668632785373]
  We study how architecture affects learning with noisy labels. We show that training with noisy labels can induce useful hidden representations, even when the model generalizes poorly. This finding leads to a simple method to improve models trained on noisy labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-23T18:58:05Z)
• Class2Simi: A Noise Reduction Perspective on Learning with Noisy Labels [98.13491369929798]
  We propose a framework called Class2Simi, which transforms data points with noisy class labels to data pairs with noisy similarity labels. Class2Simi is computationally efficient because not only this transformation is on-the-fly in mini-batches, but also it just changes loss on top of model prediction into a pairwise manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-14T07:55:32Z)
• Label Noise Types and Their Effects on Deep Learning [0.0]
  In this work, we provide a detailed analysis of the effects of different kinds of label noise on learning. We propose a generic framework to generate feature-dependent label noise, which we show to be the most challenging case for learning. For the ease of other researchers to test their algorithms with noisy labels, we share corrupted labels for the most commonly used benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-23T18:03:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.