Quasi Error-free Text Classification and Authorship Recognition in a large Corpus of English Literature based on a Novel Feature Set

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.10801v1
• Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 07:39:55 GMT
• Title: Quasi Error-free Text Classification and Authorship Recognition in a large Corpus of English Literature based on a Novel Feature Set
• Authors: Arthur M. Jacobs and Annette Kinder
• Abstract summary: We show that in the entire GLEC quasi error-free text classification and authorship recognition is possible with a method using the same set of five style and five content features. Our data pave the way for many future computational and empirical studies of literature or experiments in reading psychology.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The Gutenberg Literary English Corpus (GLEC) provides a rich source of textual data for research in digital humanities, computational linguistics or neurocognitive poetics. However, so far only a small subcorpus, the Gutenberg English Poetry Corpus, has been submitted to quantitative text analyses providing predictions for scientific studies of literature. Here we show that in the entire GLEC quasi error-free text classification and authorship recognition is possible with a method using the same set of five style and five content features, computed via style and sentiment analysis, in both tasks. Our results identify two standard and two novel features (i.e., type-token ratio, frequency, sonority score, surprise) as most diagnostic in these tasks. By providing a simple tool applicable to both short poems and long novels generating quantitative predictions about features that co-determe the cognitive and affective processing of specific text categories or authors, our data pave the way for many future computational and empirical studies of literature or experiments in reading psychology.

Related papers

• Inclusivity in Large Language Models: Personality Traits and Gender Bias in Scientific Abstracts [49.97673761305336]
  We evaluate three large language models (LLMs) for their alignment with human narrative styles and potential gender biases. Our findings indicate that, while these models generally produce text closely resembling human authored content, variations in stylistic features suggest significant gender biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-27T19:26:11Z)
• Combining Qualitative and Computational Approaches for Literary Analysis of Finnish Novels [0.0]
  We present and develop a computational approach of affect analysis that uses an emotion lexicon adapted to Finnish literary texts. We show that computational approaches have a place in traditional studies on affect in literature as a support tool for close-reading-based analyses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-03T06:07:44Z)
• Lexical Complexity Prediction: An Overview [13.224233182417636]
  The occurrence of unknown words in texts significantly hinders reading comprehension. computational modelling has been applied to identify complex words in texts and substitute them for simpler alternatives. We present an overview of computational approaches to lexical complexity prediction focusing on the work carried out on English data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-08T19:35:08Z)
• Cloning Ideology and Style using Deep Learning [0.0]
  Research focuses on text generation based on the ideology and style of a specific author, and text generation on a topic that was not written by the same author in the past. Bi-LSTM model is used to make predictions at the character level, during the training corpus of a specific author is used along with the ground truth corpus. A pre-trained model is used to identify the sentences of ground truth having contradiction with the author's corpus to make our language model inclined.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-25T11:37:19Z)
• A Latent-Variable Model for Intrinsic Probing [93.62808331764072]
  We propose a novel latent-variable formulation for constructing intrinsic probes. We find empirical evidence that pre-trained representations develop a cross-lingually entangled notion of morphosyntax.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-20T15:01:12Z)
• Computational analyses of the topics, sentiments, literariness, creativity and beauty of texts in a large Corpus of English Literature [0.0]
  The Gutenberg Literary English Corpus (GLEC) provides a rich source of textual data for research in digital humanities, computational linguistics or neurocognitive poetics. We report the results of three studies providing i) topic and sentiment analyses for six text categories of GLEC and its >100 authors, ii) novel measures of semantic complexity as indices of the literariness, creativity and book beauty of the works in GLEC.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-12T08:16:52Z)
• How much do language models copy from their training data? Evaluating linguistic novelty in text generation using RAVEN [63.79300884115027]
  Current language models can generate high-quality text. Are they simply copying text they have seen before, or have they learned generalizable linguistic abstractions? We introduce RAVEN, a suite of analyses for assessing the novelty of generated text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-18T04:07:09Z)
• Syllabic Quantity Patterns as Rhythmic Features for Latin Authorship Attribution [74.27826764855911]
  We employ syllabic quantity as a base for deriving rhythmic features for the task of computational authorship attribution of Latin prose texts. Our experiments, carried out on three different datasets, using two different machine learning methods, show that rhythmic features based on syllabic quantity are beneficial in discriminating among Latin prose authors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-27T06:25:31Z)
• Sentiment analysis in tweets: an assessment study from classical to modern text representation models [59.107260266206445]
  Short texts published on Twitter have earned significant attention as a rich source of information. Their inherent characteristics, such as the informal, and noisy linguistic style, remain challenging to many natural language processing (NLP) tasks. This study fulfils an assessment of existing language models in distinguishing the sentiment expressed in tweets by using a rich collection of 22 datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-29T21:05:28Z)
• Metrical Tagging in the Wild: Building and Annotating Poetry Corpora with Rhythmic Features [0.0]
  We provide large poetry corpora for English and German, and annotate prosodic features in smaller corpora to train corpus driven neural models. We show that BiLSTM-CRF models with syllable embeddings outperform a CRF baseline and different BERT-based approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T16:38:57Z)
• Intrinsic Probing through Dimension Selection [69.52439198455438]
  Most modern NLP systems make use of pre-trained contextual representations that attain astonishingly high performance on a variety of tasks. Such high performance should not be possible unless some form of linguistic structure inheres in these representations, and a wealth of research has sprung up on probing for it. In this paper, we draw a distinction between intrinsic probing, which examines how linguistic information is structured within a representation, and the extrinsic probing popular in prior work, which only argues for the presence of such information by showing that it can be successfully extracted.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-06T15:21:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.