A Perspective on Machine Learning Methods in Turbulence Modelling

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.12226v1
• Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 08:19:30 GMT
• Title: A Perspective on Machine Learning Methods in Turbulence Modelling
• Authors: Andrea Beck, Marius Kurz
• Abstract summary: This work presents a review of the current state of research in data-driven turbulence closure modeling. We stress that consistency of the training data, the model, the underlying physics and the discretization is a key issue that needs to be considered for a successful ML-augmented modeling strategy.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This work presents a review of the current state of research in data-driven turbulence closure modeling. It offers a perspective on the challenges and open issues, but also on the advantages and promises of machine learning methods applied to parameter estimation, model identification, closure term reconstruction and beyond, mostly from the perspective of Large Eddy Simulation and related techniques. We stress that consistency of the training data, the model, the underlying physics and the discretization is a key issue that needs to be considered for a successful ML-augmented modeling strategy. In order to make the discussion useful for non-experts in either field, we introduce both the modeling problem in turbulence as well as the prominent ML paradigms and methods in a concise and self-consistent manner. Following, we present a survey of the current data-driven model concepts and methods, highlight important developments and put them into the context of the discussed challenges.

Related papers

• SMILE: Zero-Shot Sparse Mixture of Low-Rank Experts Construction From Pre-Trained Foundation Models [85.67096251281191]
  We present an innovative approach to model fusion called zero-shot Sparse MIxture of Low-rank Experts (SMILE) construction. SMILE allows for the upscaling of source models into an MoE model without extra data or further training. We conduct extensive experiments across diverse scenarios, such as image classification and text generation tasks, using full fine-tuning and LoRA fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T17:32:15Z)
• Model Merging in LLMs, MLLMs, and Beyond: Methods, Theories, Applications and Opportunities [89.40778301238642]
  Model merging is an efficient empowerment technique in the machine learning community. There is a significant gap in the literature regarding a systematic and thorough review of these techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T16:58:48Z)
• FIARSE: Model-Heterogeneous Federated Learning via Importance-Aware Submodel Extraction [26.26211464623954]
  Federated Importance-Aware Submodel Extraction (FIARSE) is a novel approach that dynamically adjusts submodels based on the importance of model parameters. Compared to existing works, the proposed method offers a theoretical foundation for the submodel extraction. Extensive experiments are conducted on various datasets to showcase the superior performance of the proposed FIARSE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-28T04:10:11Z)
• Unified Explanations in Machine Learning Models: A Perturbation Approach [0.0]
  Inconsistencies between XAI and modeling techniques can have the undesirable effect of casting doubt upon the efficacy of these explainability approaches. We propose a systematic, perturbation-based analysis against a popular, model-agnostic method in XAI, SHapley Additive exPlanations (Shap) We devise algorithms to generate relative feature importance in settings of dynamic inference amongst a suite of popular machine learning and deep learning methods, and metrics that allow us to quantify how well explanations generated under the static case hold.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T16:04:35Z)
• Explainability for Large Language Models: A Survey [59.67574757137078]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in natural language processing. This paper introduces a taxonomy of explainability techniques and provides a structured overview of methods for explaining Transformer-based language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-02T22:14:26Z)
• MinT: Boosting Generalization in Mathematical Reasoning via Multi-View Fine-Tuning [53.90744622542961]
  Reasoning in mathematical domains remains a significant challenge for small language models (LMs) We introduce a new method that exploits existing mathematical problem datasets with diverse annotation styles. Experimental results show that our strategy enables a LLaMA-7B model to outperform prior approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-16T05:41:53Z)
• Differentiable physics-enabled closure modeling for Burgers' turbulence [0.0]
  We discuss an approach using the differentiable physics paradigm that combines known physics with machine learning to develop closure models for turbulence problems. We train a series of models that incorporate varying degrees of physical assumptions on an a posteriori loss function to test the efficacy of models. We find that constraining models with inductive biases in the form of partial differential equations that contain known physics or existing closure approaches produces highly data-efficient, accurate, and generalizable models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-23T14:38:01Z)
• Beyond Explaining: Opportunities and Challenges of XAI-Based Model Improvement [75.00655434905417]
  Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is an emerging research field bringing transparency to highly complex machine learning (ML) models. This paper offers a comprehensive overview over techniques that apply XAI practically for improving various properties of ML models. We show empirically through experiments on toy and realistic settings how explanations can help improve properties such as model generalization ability or reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-15T15:44:28Z)
• Beyond Trivial Counterfactual Explanations with Diverse Valuable Explanations [64.85696493596821]
  In computer vision applications, generative counterfactual methods indicate how to perturb a model's input to change its prediction. We propose a counterfactual method that learns a perturbation in a disentangled latent space that is constrained using a diversity-enforcing loss. Our model improves the success rate of producing high-quality valuable explanations when compared to previous state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-18T12:57:34Z)
• Understanding the Mechanics of SPIGOT: Surrogate Gradients for Latent Structure Learning [20.506232306308977]
  Latent structure models are a powerful tool for modeling language data. One challenge with end-to-end training of these models is the argmax operation, which has null gradient. We explore latent structure learning through the angle of pulling back the downstream learning objective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-05T21:56:00Z)
• Deep Model-Based Reinforcement Learning for High-Dimensional Problems, a Survey [1.2031796234206134]
  Model-based reinforcement learning creates an explicit model of the environment dynamics to reduce the need for environment samples. A challenge for deep model-based methods is to achieve high predictive power while maintaining low sample complexity. We propose a taxonomy based on three approaches: using explicit planning on given transitions, using explicit planning on learned transitions, and end-to-end learning of both planning and transitions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-11T08:49:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.