Compositional Generalization and Natural Language Variation: Can a Semantic Parsing Approach Handle Both?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.12725v2
• Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2021 21:25:04 GMT
• Title: Compositional Generalization and Natural Language Variation: Can a Semantic Parsing Approach Handle Both?
• Authors: Peter Shaw, Ming-Wei Chang, Panupong Pasupat, Kristina Toutanova
• Abstract summary: We ask: can we develop a semantic parsing approach that handles both natural language variation and compositional generalization? We propose new train and test splits of non-synthetic datasets to better assess this capability. We also propose NQG-T5, a hybrid model that combines a high-precision grammar-based approach with a pre-trained sequence-to-sequence model.
• Score: 27.590858384414567
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Sequence-to-sequence models excel at handling natural language variation, but have been shown to struggle with out-of-distribution compositional generalization. This has motivated new specialized architectures with stronger compositional biases, but most of these approaches have only been evaluated on synthetically-generated datasets, which are not representative of natural language variation. In this work we ask: can we develop a semantic parsing approach that handles both natural language variation and compositional generalization? To better assess this capability, we propose new train and test splits of non-synthetic datasets. We demonstrate that strong existing approaches do not perform well across a broad set of evaluations. We also propose NQG-T5, a hybrid model that combines a high-precision grammar-based approach with a pre-trained sequence-to-sequence model. It outperforms existing approaches across several compositional generalization challenges on non-synthetic data, while also being competitive with the state-of-the-art on standard evaluations. While still far from solving this problem, our study highlights the importance of diverse evaluations and the open challenge of handling both compositional generalization and natural language variation in semantic parsing.

Related papers

• SHINE: Saliency-aware HIerarchical NEgative Ranking for Compositional Temporal Grounding [52.98133831401225]
  Temporal grounding, also known as video moment retrieval, aims at locating video segments corresponding to a given query sentence. We propose a large language model-driven method for negative query construction, utilizing GPT-3.5-Turbo. We introduce a coarse-to-fine saliency ranking strategy, which encourages the model to learn the multi-granularity semantic relationships between videos and hierarchical negative queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-06T16:08:17Z)
• On Evaluating Multilingual Compositional Generalization with Translated Datasets [34.51457321680049]
  We show that compositional generalization abilities differ across languages. We craft a faithful rule-based translation of the MCWQ dataset from English to Chinese and Japanese. Even with the resulting robust benchmark, which we call MCWQ-R, we show that the distribution of compositions still suffers due to linguistic divergences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-20T10:03:57Z)
• Laziness Is a Virtue When It Comes to Compositionality in Neural Semantic Parsing [20.856601758389544]
  We introduce a neural semantic parsing generation method that constructs logical forms from the bottom up, beginning from the logical form's leaves. We show that our novel, bottom-up parsing semantic technique outperforms general-purpose semantics while also being competitive with comparable neurals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-07T17:53:08Z)
• Mutual Exclusivity Training and Primitive Augmentation to Induce Compositionality [84.94877848357896]
  Recent datasets expose the lack of the systematic generalization ability in standard sequence-to-sequence models. We analyze this behavior of seq2seq models and identify two contributing factors: a lack of mutual exclusivity bias and the tendency to memorize whole examples. We show substantial empirical improvements using standard sequence-to-sequence models on two widely-used compositionality datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-28T17:36:41Z)
• Compositional Generalization Requires Compositional Parsers [69.77216620997305]
  We compare sequence-to-sequence models and models guided by compositional principles on the recent COGS corpus. We show structural generalization is a key measure of compositional generalization and requires models that are aware of complex structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-24T07:36:35Z)
• Grounded Graph Decoding Improves Compositional Generalization in Question Answering [68.72605660152101]
  Question answering models struggle to generalize to novel compositions of training patterns, such as longer sequences or more complex test structures. We propose Grounded Graph Decoding, a method to improve compositional generalization of language representations by grounding structured predictions with an attention mechanism. Our model significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on the Compositional Freebase Questions (CFQ) dataset, a challenging benchmark for compositional generalization in question answering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-05T17:50:14Z)
• Improving Compositional Generalization with Self-Training for Data-to-Text Generation [36.973617793800315]
  We study the compositional generalization of current generation models in data-to-text tasks. By simulating structural shifts in the compositional Weather dataset, we show that T5 models fail to generalize to unseen structures. We propose an approach based on self-training using finetuned BLEURT for pseudo-response selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-16T04:26:56Z)
• Improving Compositional Generalization in Classification Tasks via Structure Annotations [33.90268697120572]
  Humans have a great ability to generalize compositionally, but state-of-the-art neural models struggle to do so. First, we study ways to convert a natural language sequence-to-sequence dataset to a classification dataset that also requires compositional generalization. Second, we show that providing structural hints (specifically, providing parse trees and entity links as attention masks for a Transformer model) helps compositional generalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-19T06:07:27Z)
• Sequence-Level Mixed Sample Data Augmentation [119.94667752029143]
  This work proposes a simple data augmentation approach to encourage compositional behavior in neural models for sequence-to-sequence problems. Our approach, SeqMix, creates new synthetic examples by softly combining input/output sequences from the training set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-18T02:18:04Z)
• Compositional Generalization via Semantic Tagging [81.24269148865555]
  We propose a new decoding framework that preserves the expressivity and generality of sequence-to-sequence models. We show that the proposed approach consistently improves compositional generalization across model architectures, domains, and semantic formalisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T15:55:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.