Saying No is An Art: Contextualized Fallback Responses for Unanswerable Dialogue Queries

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2012.01873v3
• Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 07:40:16 GMT
• Title: Saying No is An Art: Contextualized Fallback Responses for Unanswerable Dialogue Queries
• Authors: Ashish Shrivastava, Kaustubh Dhole, Abhinav Bhatt, Sharvani Raghunath
• Abstract summary: Most dialogue systems rely on hybrid approaches for generating a set of ranked responses. We design a neural approach which generates responses which are contextually aware with the user query. Our simple approach makes use of rules over dependency parses and a text-to-text transformer fine-tuned on synthetic data of question-response pairs.
• Score: 3.593955557310285
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Despite end-to-end neural systems making significant progress in the last decade for task-oriented as well as chit-chat based dialogue systems, most dialogue systems rely on hybrid approaches which use a combination of rule-based, retrieval and generative approaches for generating a set of ranked responses. Such dialogue systems need to rely on a fallback mechanism to respond to out-of-domain or novel user queries which are not answerable within the scope of the dialog system. While, dialog systems today rely on static and unnatural responses like "I don't know the answer to that question" or "I'm not sure about that", we design a neural approach which generates responses which are contextually aware with the user query as well as say no to the user. Such customized responses provide paraphrasing ability and contextualization as well as improve the interaction with the user and reduce dialogue monotonicity. Our simple approach makes use of rules over dependency parses and a text-to-text transformer fine-tuned on synthetic data of question-response pairs generating highly relevant, grammatical as well as diverse questions. We perform automatic and manual evaluations to demonstrate the efficacy of the system.

Related papers

• Social Commonsense-Guided Search Query Generation for Open-Domain Knowledge-Powered Conversations [66.16863141262506]
  We present a novel approach that focuses on generating internet search queries guided by social commonsense. Our proposed framework addresses passive user interactions by integrating topic tracking, commonsense response generation and instruction-driven query generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-22T16:14:56Z)
• PICK: Polished & Informed Candidate Scoring for Knowledge-Grounded Dialogue Systems [59.1250765143521]
  Current knowledge-grounded dialogue systems often fail to align the generated responses with human-preferred qualities. We propose Polished & Informed Candidate Scoring (PICK), a generation re-scoring framework. We demonstrate the effectiveness of PICK in generating responses that are more faithful while keeping them relevant to the dialogue history.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-19T08:27:09Z)
• Contextual Dynamic Prompting for Response Generation in Task-oriented Dialog Systems [8.419582942080927]
  Response generation is one of the critical components in task-oriented dialog systems. We propose an approach that performs textit dynamic prompting where the prompts are learnt from dialog contexts. We show that contextual dynamic prompts improve response generation in terms of textit combined score citemehri-etal 2019-structured by 3 absolute points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-30T20:26:02Z)
• A Systematic Evaluation of Response Selection for Open Domain Dialogue [36.88551817451512]
  We curated a dataset where responses from multiple response generators produced for the same dialog context are manually annotated as appropriate (positive) and inappropriate (negative) We conduct a systematic evaluation of state-of-the-art methods for response selection, and demonstrate that both strategies of using multiple positive candidates and using manually verified hard negative candidates can bring in significant performance improvement in comparison to using the adversarial training data, e.g., increase of 3% and 13% in Recall@1 score, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-08T19:33:30Z)
• Grounding in social media: An approach to building a chit-chat dialogue model [9.247397520986999]
  Building open-domain dialogue systems capable of rich human-like conversational ability is one of the fundamental challenges in language generation. Current work on knowledge-grounded dialogue generation primarily focuses on persona incorporation or searching a fact-based structured knowledge source such as Wikipedia. Our method takes a broader and simpler approach, which aims to improve the raw conversation ability of the system by mimicking the human response behavior on social media.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-12T09:01:57Z)
• Target-Guided Dialogue Response Generation Using Commonsense and Data Augmentation [32.764356638437214]
  We introduce a new technique for target-guided response generation. We also propose techniques to re-purpose existing dialogue datasets for target-guided generation. Our work generally enables dialogue system designers to exercise more control over the conversations that their systems produce.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-19T04:01:40Z)
• What is wrong with you?: Leveraging User Sentiment for Automatic Dialog Evaluation [73.03318027164605]
  We propose to use information that can be automatically extracted from the next user utterance as a proxy to measure the quality of the previous system response. Our model generalizes across both spoken and written open-domain dialog corpora collected from real and paid users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-25T22:09:52Z)
• Towards Large-Scale Interpretable Knowledge Graph Reasoning for Dialogue Systems [109.16553492049441]
  We propose a novel method to incorporate the knowledge reasoning capability into dialogue systems in a more scalable and generalizable manner. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to have transformer models generate responses by reasoning over differentiable knowledge graphs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-20T17:51:49Z)
• User Response and Sentiment Prediction for Automatic Dialogue Evaluation [69.11124655437902]
  We propose to use the sentiment of the next user utterance for turn or dialog level evaluation. Experiments show our model outperforming existing automatic evaluation metrics on both written and spoken open-domain dialogue datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-16T22:19:17Z)
• Alexa Conversations: An Extensible Data-driven Approach for Building Task-oriented Dialogue Systems [21.98135285833616]
  Traditional goal-oriented dialogue systems rely on various components such as natural language understanding, dialogue state tracking, policy learning and response generation. We present a new approach for building goal-oriented dialogue systems that is scalable, as well as data efficient.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-19T07:09:27Z)
• Generating Dialogue Responses from a Semantic Latent Space [75.18449428414736]
  We propose an alternative to the end-to-end classification on vocabulary. We learn the pair relationship between the prompts and responses as a regression task on a latent space. Human evaluation showed that learning the task on a continuous space can generate responses that are both relevant and informative.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-04T19:06:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.