Voting of predictive models for clinical outcomes: consensus of
algorithms for the early prediction of sepsis from clinical data and an
analysis of the PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2019
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2012.11013v1
- Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 20:12:49 GMT
- Title: Voting of predictive models for clinical outcomes: consensus of
algorithms for the early prediction of sepsis from clinical data and an
analysis of the PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2019
- Authors: Matthew A. Reyna and Gari D. Clifford
- Abstract summary: We consider the problem of constructing an ensemble algorithm from 70 individual algorithms for the early prediction of sepsis from clinical data.
We find that this ensemble algorithm outperforms separate algorithms, especially on a hidden test set.
- Score: 2.0559497209595823
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Although there has been significant research in boosting of weak learners,
there has been little work in the field of boosting from strong learners. This
latter paradigm is a form of weighted voting with learned weights. In this
work, we consider the problem of constructing an ensemble algorithm from 70
individual algorithms for the early prediction of sepsis from clinical data. We
find that this ensemble algorithm outperforms separate algorithms, especially
on a hidden test set on which most algorithms failed to generalize.
Related papers
- Human Expertise in Algorithmic Prediction [16.104330706951004]
We introduce a novel framework for incorporating human expertise into algorithmic predictions.
Our approach leverages human judgment to distinguish inputs which are algorithmically indistinguishable, or "look the same" to predictive algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-01T17:23:54Z) - Regularization-Based Methods for Ordinal Quantification [49.606912965922504]
We study the ordinal case, i.e., the case in which a total order is defined on the set of n>2 classes.
We propose a novel class of regularized OQ algorithms, which outperforms existing algorithms in our experiments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-13T16:04:06Z) - Careful seeding for the k-medoids algorithm with incremental k++ cluster
construction [4.981260380070016]
An improved k-medoids algorithm (INCKM) was recently proposed to overcome this drawback.
We propose a novel incremental k-medoids algorithm (INCKPP) which dynamically increases the number of clusters.
Our algorithm can overcome the parameter selection problem in the improved k-medoids algorithm, improve clustering performance, and deal with imbalanced datasets very well.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-06T02:25:35Z) - Towards Diverse Evaluation of Class Incremental Learning: A Representation Learning Perspective [67.45111837188685]
Class incremental learning (CIL) algorithms aim to continually learn new object classes from incrementally arriving data.
We experimentally analyze neural network models trained by CIL algorithms using various evaluation protocols in representation learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-16T11:44:11Z) - Learning Predictions for Algorithms with Predictions [49.341241064279714]
We introduce a general design approach for algorithms that learn predictors.
We apply techniques from online learning to learn against adversarial instances, tune robustness-consistency trade-offs, and obtain new statistical guarantees.
We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach at deriving learning algorithms by analyzing methods for bipartite matching, page migration, ski-rental, and job scheduling.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-18T17:25:43Z) - Amortized Implicit Differentiation for Stochastic Bilevel Optimization [53.12363770169761]
We study a class of algorithms for solving bilevel optimization problems in both deterministic and deterministic settings.
We exploit a warm-start strategy to amortize the estimation of the exact gradient.
By using this framework, our analysis shows these algorithms to match the computational complexity of methods that have access to an unbiased estimate of the gradient.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-29T15:10:09Z) - Clinical Validation of Single-Chamber Model-Based Algorithms Used to
Estimate Respiratory Compliance [2.9511531830032083]
We establish an open, clinically validated dataset of mechanical lungs and nearly 40,000 breaths from 18 intubated patients.
Next, we evaluate 15 different algorithms that use the "single chamber" model of estimating respiratory compliance.
In particular, we explore algorithm performance under four different types of patient ventilator asynchrony.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-19T07:34:15Z) - Ensemble Learning based on Classifier Prediction Confidence and
Comprehensive Learning Particle Swarm Optimisation for polyp localisation [6.212408891922064]
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the first cause of death in many countries.
In this paper, we introduce an ensemble of medical polyp segmentation algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-10T18:34:42Z) - Run2Survive: A Decision-theoretic Approach to Algorithm Selection based
on Survival Analysis [75.64261155172856]
survival analysis (SA) naturally supports censored data and offers appropriate ways to use such data for learning distributional models of algorithm runtime.
We leverage such models as a basis of a sophisticated decision-theoretic approach to algorithm selection, which we dub Run2Survive.
In an extensive experimental study with the standard benchmark ASlib, our approach is shown to be highly competitive and in many cases even superior to state-of-the-art AS approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-06T15:20:17Z) - Probabilistic Diagnostic Tests for Degradation Problems in Supervised
Learning [0.0]
Problems such as class imbalance, overlapping, small-disjuncts, noisy labels, and sparseness limit accuracy in classification algorithms.
Probability diagnostic model based on identifying signs and symptoms of each problem is presented.
Behavior and performance of several supervised algorithms are studied when training sets have such problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-06T20:32:35Z) - VerSe: A Vertebrae Labelling and Segmentation Benchmark for
Multi-detector CT Images [121.31355003451152]
Large Scale Vertebrae Challenge (VerSe) was organised in conjunction with the International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) in 2019 and 2020.
We present the the results of this evaluation and further investigate the performance-variation at vertebra-level, scan-level, and at different fields-of-view.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-24T21:09:18Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.