On Calibration of Scene-Text Recognition Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2012.12643v1
• Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 13:25:25 GMT
• Title: On Calibration of Scene-Text Recognition Models
• Authors: Ron Slossberg, Oron Anschel, Amir Markovitz, Ron Litman, Aviad Aberdam, Shahar Tsiper, Shai Mazor, Jon Wu and R. Manmatha
• Abstract summary: We analyze several recent STR methods and show that they are consistently overconfident. We demonstrate that for attention based decoders, calibration of individual character predictions increases word-level calibration error.
• Score: 16.181357648680365
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: In this work, we study the problem of word-level confidence calibration for scene-text recognition (STR). Although the topic of confidence calibration has been an active research area for the last several decades, the case of structured and sequence prediction calibration has been scarcely explored. We analyze several recent STR methods and show that they are consistently overconfident. We then focus on the calibration of STR models on the word rather than the character level. In particular, we demonstrate that for attention based decoders, calibration of individual character predictions increases word-level calibration error compared to an uncalibrated model. In addition, we apply existing calibration methodologies as well as new sequence-based extensions to numerous STR models, demonstrating reduced calibration error by up to a factor of nearly 7. Finally, we show consistently improved accuracy results by applying our proposed sequence calibration method as a preprocessing step to beam-search.

Related papers

• Reassessing How to Compare and Improve the Calibration of Machine Learning Models [7.183341902583164]
  A machine learning model is calibrated if its predicted probability for an outcome matches the observed frequency for that outcome conditional on the model prediction. We show that there exist trivial recalibration approaches that can appear seemingly state-of-the-art unless calibration and prediction metrics are accompanied by additional generalization metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T13:33:45Z)
• Towards Certification of Uncertainty Calibration under Adversarial Attacks [96.48317453951418]
  We show that attacks can significantly harm calibration, and thus propose certified calibration as worst-case bounds on calibration under adversarial perturbations. We propose novel calibration attacks and demonstrate how they can improve model calibration through textitadversarial calibration training
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-22T18:52:09Z)
• C-TPT: Calibrated Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models via Text Feature Dispersion [54.81141583427542]
  In deep learning, test-time adaptation has gained attention as a method for model fine-tuning without the need for labeled data. This paper explores calibration during test-time prompt tuning by leveraging the inherent properties of CLIP. We present a novel method, Calibrated Test-time Prompt Tuning (C-TPT), for optimizing prompts during test-time with enhanced calibration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T04:08:29Z)
• A Study on the Calibration of In-context Learning [27.533223818505682]
  We study in-context learning (ICL), a prevalent method for adapting static language models through tailored prompts. We observe that, with an increasing number of ICL examples, models initially exhibit increased miscalibration before achieving better calibration. We explore recalibration techniques and find that a scaling-binning calibrator can reduce calibration errors consistently.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-07T03:37:39Z)
• Calibration by Distribution Matching: Trainable Kernel Calibration Metrics [56.629245030893685]
  We introduce kernel-based calibration metrics that unify and generalize popular forms of calibration for both classification and regression. These metrics admit differentiable sample estimates, making it easy to incorporate a calibration objective into empirical risk minimization. We provide intuitive mechanisms to tailor calibration metrics to a decision task, and enforce accurate loss estimation and no regret decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T06:19:40Z)
• On Calibrating Semantic Segmentation Models: Analyses and An Algorithm [51.85289816613351]
  We study the problem of semantic segmentation calibration. Model capacity, crop size, multi-scale testing, and prediction correctness have impact on calibration. We propose a simple, unifying, and effective approach, namely selective scaling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-22T22:05:16Z)
• Post-hoc Uncertainty Calibration for Domain Drift Scenarios [46.88826364244423]
  We show that existing post-hoc calibration methods yield highly over-confident predictions under domain shift. We introduce a simple strategy where perturbations are applied to samples in the validation set before performing the post-hoc calibration step.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-20T18:21:13Z)
• Unsupervised Calibration under Covariate Shift [92.02278658443166]
  We introduce the problem of calibration under domain shift and propose an importance sampling based approach to address it. We evaluate and discuss the efficacy of our method on both real-world datasets and synthetic datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-29T21:50:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.