Selection of Summary Statistics for Network Model Choice with Approximate Bayesian Computation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.07766v1
• Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 18:21:06 GMT
• Title: Selection of Summary Statistics for Network Model Choice with Approximate Bayesian Computation
• Authors: Louis Raynal and Jukka-Pekka Onnela
• Abstract summary: We study the utility of cost-based filter selection methods to account for different summary costs during the selection process. Our findings show that computationally inexpensive summary statistics can be efficiently selected with minimal impact on classification accuracy.
• Score: 1.8884278918443564
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) now serves as one of the major strategies to perform model choice and parameter inference on models with intractable likelihoods. An essential component of ABC involves comparing a large amount of simulated data with the observed data through summary statistics. To avoid the curse of dimensionality, summary statistic selection is of prime importance, and becomes even more critical when applying ABC to mechanistic network models. Indeed, while many summary statistics can be used to encode network structures, their computational complexity can be highly variable. For large networks, computation of summary statistics can quickly create a bottleneck, making the use of ABC difficult. To reduce this computational burden and make the analysis of mechanistic network models more practical, we investigated two questions in a model choice framework. First, we studied the utility of cost-based filter selection methods to account for different summary costs during the selection process. Second, we performed selection using networks generated with a smaller number of nodes to reduce the time required for the selection step. Our findings show that computationally inexpensive summary statistics can be efficiently selected with minimal impact on classification accuracy. Furthermore, we found that networks with a smaller number of nodes can only be employed to eliminate a moderate number of summaries. While this latter finding is network specific, the former is general and can be adapted to any ABC application.

Related papers

• Sample Complexity of Algorithm Selection Using Neural Networks and Its Applications to Branch-and-Cut [1.4624458429745086]
  We build upon recent work in this line of research by considering the setup where, instead of selecting a single algorithm that has the best performance, we allow the possibility of selecting an algorithm based on the instance to be solved. In particular, given a representative sample of instances, we learn a neural network that maps an instance of the problem to the most appropriate algorithm for that instance. In other words, the neural network will take as input a mixed-integer optimization instance and output a decision that will result in a small branch-and-cut tree for that instance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-04T03:03:27Z)
• Minimally Supervised Learning using Topological Projections in Self-Organizing Maps [55.31182147885694]
  We introduce a semi-supervised learning approach based on topological projections in self-organizing maps (SOMs) Our proposed method first trains SOMs on unlabeled data and then a minimal number of available labeled data points are assigned to key best matching units (BMU) Our results indicate that the proposed minimally supervised model significantly outperforms traditional regression techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T22:51:48Z)
• Towards Free Data Selection with General-Purpose Models [71.92151210413374]
  A desirable data selection algorithm can efficiently choose the most informative samples to maximize the utility of limited annotation budgets. Current approaches, represented by active learning methods, typically follow a cumbersome pipeline that iterates the time-consuming model training and batch data selection repeatedly. FreeSel bypasses the heavy batch selection process, achieving a significant improvement in efficiency and being 530x faster than existing active learning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T15:50:14Z)
• A Statistical View of Column Subset Selection [91.3755431537592]
  We consider the problem of selecting a small subset of representative variables from a large dataset. We show how to efficiently (1) perform CSS using only summary statistics from the original dataset; (2) perform CSS in the presence of missing and/or censored data; and (3) select the subset size for CSS in a hypothesis testing framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-24T15:42:33Z)
• MILO: Model-Agnostic Subset Selection Framework for Efficient Model Training and Tuning [68.12870241637636]
  We propose MILO, a model-agnostic subset selection framework that decouples the subset selection from model training. Our empirical results indicate that MILO can train models $3times - 10 times$ faster and tune hyperparameters $20times - 75 times$ faster than full-dataset training or tuning without performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-30T20:59:30Z)
• Adversarial training with informed data selection [53.19381941131439]
  Adrial training is the most efficient solution to defend the network against these malicious attacks. This work proposes a data selection strategy to be applied in the mini-batch training. The simulation results show that a good compromise can be obtained regarding robustness and standard accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-07T12:09:50Z)
• A Statistical-Modelling Approach to Feedforward Neural Network Model Selection [0.8287206589886881]
  Feedforward neural networks (FNNs) can be viewed as non-linear regression models. A novel model selection method is proposed using the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) for FNNs. The choice of BIC over out-of-sample performance leads to an increased probability of recovering the true model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-09T11:07:04Z)
• Approximate Bayesian Computation with Domain Expert in the Loop [13.801835670003008]
  We introduce an active learning method for ABC statistics selection which reduces the domain expert's work considerably. By involving the experts, we are able to handle misspecified models, unlike the existing dimension reduction methods. empirical results show better posterior estimates than with existing methods, when the simulation budget is limited.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-28T12:58:51Z)
• A Markov Decision Process Approach to Active Meta Learning [24.50189361694407]
  In supervised learning, we fit a single statistical model to a given data set, assuming that the data is associated with a singular task. In meta-learning, the data is associated with numerous tasks, and we seek a model that may perform well on all tasks simultaneously.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-10T15:45:34Z)
• The Devil is in Classification: A Simple Framework for Long-tail Object Detection and Instance Segmentation [93.17367076148348]
  We investigate performance drop of the state-of-the-art two-stage instance segmentation model Mask R-CNN on the recent long-tail LVIS dataset. We unveil that a major cause is the inaccurate classification of object proposals. We propose a simple calibration framework to more effectively alleviate classification head bias with a bi-level class balanced sampling approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-23T12:49:07Z)
• Convolutional Neural Networks as Summary Statistics for Approximate Bayesian Computation [0.0]
  This paper proposes a convolutional neural network architecture for automatically learning informative summary statistics of temporal responses. We show that the proposed network can effectively circumvent the statistics selection problem of the preprocessing step for ABC inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-31T10:46:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.