Challenges for Using Impact Regularizers to Avoid Negative Side Effects

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.12509v1
• Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 10:32:51 GMT
• Title: Challenges for Using Impact Regularizers to Avoid Negative Side Effects
• Authors: David Lindner and Kyle Matoba and Alexander Meulemans
• Abstract summary: We discuss the main current challenges of impact regularizers and relate them to fundamental design decisions. We explore promising directions to overcome the unsolved challenges in preventing negative side effects with impact regularizers.
• Score: 74.67972013102462
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Designing reward functions for reinforcement learning is difficult: besides specifying which behavior is rewarded for a task, the reward also has to discourage undesired outcomes. Misspecified reward functions can lead to unintended negative side effects, and overall unsafe behavior. To overcome this problem, recent work proposed to augment the specified reward function with an impact regularizer that discourages behavior that has a big impact on the environment. Although initial results with impact regularizers seem promising in mitigating some types of side effects, important challenges remain. In this paper, we examine the main current challenges of impact regularizers and relate them to fundamental design decisions. We discuss in detail which challenges recent approaches address and which remain unsolved. Finally, we explore promising directions to overcome the unsolved challenges in preventing negative side effects with impact regularizers.

Related papers

• Steady-State Error Compensation for Reinforcement Learning with Quadratic Rewards [1.0725881801927162]
  The selection of a reward function in Reinforcement Learning (RL) has garnered significant attention because of its impact on system performance. This study proposes an approach that introduces an integral term. By integrating this integral term into quadratic-type reward functions, the RL algorithm is adeptly tuned, augmenting the system's consideration of reward history.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T10:35:26Z)
• Behavior Alignment via Reward Function Optimization [23.92721220310242]
  We introduce a new framework that integrates auxiliary rewards reflecting a designer's domain knowledge with the environment's primary rewards. We evaluate our method's efficacy on a diverse set of tasks, from small-scale experiments to high-dimensional control challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-29T13:45:07Z)
• Fighting Copycat Agents in Behavioral Cloning from Observation Histories [85.404120663644]
  Imitation learning trains policies to map from input observations to the actions that an expert would choose. We propose an adversarial approach to learn a feature representation that removes excess information about the previous expert action nuisance correlate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-28T10:52:10Z)
• Avoiding Side Effects By Considering Future Tasks [21.443513600055837]
  We propose an algorithm to automatically generate an auxiliary reward function that penalizes side effects. This auxiliary objective rewards the ability to complete possible future tasks, which decreases if the agent causes side effects during the current task. We show that our method avoids interference and is more effective for avoiding side effects than the common approach of penalizing irreversible actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T16:55:26Z)
• Disentangling causal effects for hierarchical reinforcement learning [0.0]
  This study aims to expedite the learning of task-specific behavior by leveraging a hierarchy of causal effects. We propose CEHRL, a hierarchical method that models the distribution of controllable effects using a Variational Autoencoder. In comparison to exploring with random actions, experimental results show that random effect exploration is a more efficient mechanism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-03T13:19:16Z)
• Avoiding Negative Side Effects due to Incomplete Knowledge of AI Systems [35.763408055286355]
  Learning to recognize and avoid negative side effects of an agent's actions is critical to improve the safety and reliability of autonomous systems. Mitigating negative side effects is an emerging research topic that is attracting increased attention due to the rapid growth in the deployment of AI systems. This article provides a comprehensive overview of different forms of negative side effects and the recent research efforts to address them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-24T16:48:46Z)
• Learning "What-if" Explanations for Sequential Decision-Making [92.8311073739295]
  Building interpretable parameterizations of real-world decision-making on the basis of demonstrated behavior is essential. We propose learning explanations of expert decisions by modeling their reward function in terms of preferences with respect to "what if" outcomes. We highlight the effectiveness of our batch, counterfactual inverse reinforcement learning approach in recovering accurate and interpretable descriptions of behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-02T14:24:17Z)
• Amnesic Probing: Behavioral Explanation with Amnesic Counterfactuals [53.484562601127195]
  We point out the inability to infer behavioral conclusions from probing results. We offer an alternative method that focuses on how the information is being used, rather than on what information is encoded.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-01T15:00:11Z)
• Soft Hindsight Experience Replay [77.99182201815763]
  Soft Hindsight Experience Replay (SHER) is a novel approach based on HER and Maximum Entropy Reinforcement Learning (MERL) We evaluate SHER on Open AI Robotic manipulation tasks with sparse rewards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-06T03:57:04Z)
• Corruption-robust exploration in episodic reinforcement learning [76.19192549843727]
  We study multi-stage episodic reinforcement learning under adversarial corruptions in both the rewards and the transition probabilities of the underlying system. Our framework yields efficient algorithms which attain near-optimal regret in the absence of corruptions. Notably, our work provides the first sublinear regret guarantee which any deviation from purely i.i.d. transitions in the bandit-feedback model for episodic reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-11-20T03:49:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.