Regression or Classification? New Methods to Evaluate No-Reference Picture and Video Quality Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.00155v1
• Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2021 05:40:14 GMT
• Title: Regression or Classification? New Methods to Evaluate No-Reference Picture and Video Quality Models
• Authors: Zhengzhong Tu, Chia-Ju Chen, Li-Heng Chen, Yilin Wang, Neil Birkbeck, Balu Adsumilli, and Alan C. Bovik
• Abstract summary: We propose two new methods to evaluate and compare no-reference quality models at coarser levels. We conduct a benchmark experiment of popular no-reference quality models on recent in-the-wild picture and video quality datasets.
• Score: 45.974399400141685
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Video and image quality assessment has long been projected as a regression problem, which requires predicting a continuous quality score given an input stimulus. However, recent efforts have shown that accurate quality score regression on real-world user-generated content (UGC) is a very challenging task. To make the problem more tractable, we propose two new methods - binary, and ordinal classification - as alternatives to evaluate and compare no-reference quality models at coarser levels. Moreover, the proposed new tasks convey more practical meaning on perceptually optimized UGC transcoding, or for preprocessing on media processing platforms. We conduct a comprehensive benchmark experiment of popular no-reference quality models on recent in-the-wild picture and video quality datasets, providing reliable baselines for both evaluation methods to support further studies. We hope this work promotes coarse-grained perceptual modeling and its applications to efficient UGC processing.

Related papers

• Advancing Video Quality Assessment for AIGC [17.23281750562252]
  We propose a novel loss function that combines mean absolute error with cross-entropy loss to mitigate inter-frame quality inconsistencies. We also introduce the innovative S2CNet technique to retain critical content, while leveraging adversarial training to enhance the model's generalization capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-23T10:36:22Z)
• MSTRIQ: No Reference Image Quality Assessment Based on Swin Transformer with Multi-Stage Fusion [8.338999282303755]
  We propose a novel algorithm based on the Swin Transformer. It aggregates information from both local and global features to better predict the quality. It ranks 2nd in the no-reference track of NTIRE 2022 Perceptual Image Quality Assessment Challenge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-20T11:34:35Z)
• Conformer and Blind Noisy Students for Improved Image Quality Assessment [80.57006406834466]
  Learning-based approaches for perceptual image quality assessment (IQA) usually require both the distorted and reference image for measuring the perceptual quality accurately. In this work, we explore the performance of transformer-based full-reference IQA models. We also propose a method for IQA based on semi-supervised knowledge distillation from full-reference teacher models into blind student models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-27T10:21:08Z)
• Image Quality Assessment using Contrastive Learning [50.265638572116984]
  We train a deep Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) using a contrastive pairwise objective to solve the auxiliary problem. We show through extensive experiments that CONTRIQUE achieves competitive performance when compared to state-of-the-art NR image quality models. Our results suggest that powerful quality representations with perceptual relevance can be obtained without requiring large labeled subjective image quality datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-25T21:01:00Z)
• Image Quality Assessment in the Modern Age [53.19271326110551]
  This tutorial provides the audience with the basic theories, methodologies, and current progresses of image quality assessment (IQA) We will first revisit several subjective quality assessment methodologies, with emphasis on how to properly select visual stimuli. Both hand-engineered and (deep) learning-based methods will be covered.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-19T02:38:46Z)
• Group-aware Contrastive Regression for Action Quality Assessment [85.43203180953076]
  We show that the relations among videos can provide important clues for more accurate action quality assessment. Our approach outperforms previous methods by a large margin and establishes new state-of-the-art on all three benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-17T17:59:39Z)
• Study on the Assessment of the Quality of Experience of Streaming Video [117.44028458220427]
  In this paper, the influence of various objective factors on the subjective estimation of the QoE of streaming video is studied. The paper presents standard and handcrafted features, shows their correlation and p-Value of significance. We take SQoE-III database, so far the largest and most realistic of its kind.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-08T18:46:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.