Language Models for Lexical Inference in Context

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.05331v1
• Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 09:08:22 GMT
• Title: Language Models for Lexical Inference in Context
• Authors: Martin Schmitt and Hinrich Sch\"utze
• Abstract summary: Lexical inference in context (LIiC) is the task of recognizing textual entailment between two very similar sentences. We formulate and evaluate the first approaches based on pretrained language models (LMs) for this task. All our approaches outperform the previous state of the art, showing the potential of pretrained LMs for LIiC.
• Score: 4.581468205348204
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Lexical inference in context (LIiC) is the task of recognizing textual entailment between two very similar sentences, i.e., sentences that only differ in one expression. It can therefore be seen as a variant of the natural language inference task that is focused on lexical semantics. We formulate and evaluate the first approaches based on pretrained language models (LMs) for this task: (i) a few-shot NLI classifier, (ii) a relation induction approach based on handcrafted patterns expressing the semantics of lexical inference, and (iii) a variant of (ii) with patterns that were automatically extracted from a corpus. All our approaches outperform the previous state of the art, showing the potential of pretrained LMs for LIiC. In an extensive analysis, we investigate factors of success and failure of our three approaches.

Related papers

• Distilling Monolingual and Crosslingual Word-in-Context Representations [18.87665111304974]
  We propose a method that distils representations of word meaning in context from a pre-trained language model in both monolingual and crosslingual settings. Our method does not require human-annotated corpora nor updates of the parameters of the pre-trained model. Our method learns to combine the outputs of different hidden layers of the pre-trained model using self-attention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-13T11:10:16Z)
• Pixel Sentence Representation Learning [67.4775296225521]
  In this work, we conceptualize the learning of sentence-level textual semantics as a visual representation learning process. We employ visually-grounded text perturbation methods like typos and word order shuffling, resonating with human cognitive patterns, and enabling perturbation to be perceived as continuous. Our approach is further bolstered by large-scale unsupervised topical alignment training and natural language inference supervision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T02:46:45Z)
• A Comprehensive Empirical Evaluation of Existing Word Embedding Approaches [5.065947993017158]
  We present the characteristics of existing word embedding approaches and analyze them with regard to many classification tasks. Traditional approaches mostly use matrix factorization to produce word representations, and they are not able to capture the semantic and syntactic regularities of the language very well. On the other hand, Neural-network-based approaches can capture sophisticated regularities of the language and preserve the word relationships in the generated word representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-13T15:34:19Z)
• A Latent-Variable Model for Intrinsic Probing [93.62808331764072]
  We propose a novel latent-variable formulation for constructing intrinsic probes. We find empirical evidence that pre-trained representations develop a cross-lingually entangled notion of morphosyntax.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-20T15:01:12Z)
• On the Faithfulness Measurements for Model Interpretations [100.2730234575114]
  Post-hoc interpretations aim to uncover how natural language processing (NLP) models make predictions. To tackle these issues, we start with three criteria: the removal-based criterion, the sensitivity of interpretations, and the stability of interpretations. Motivated by the desideratum of these faithfulness notions, we introduce a new class of interpretation methods that adopt techniques from the adversarial domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-18T09:19:44Z)
• Multi-sense embeddings through a word sense disambiguation process [2.2344764434954256]
  Most Suitable Sense. (MSSA) disambiguates and annotates each word by its specific sense, considering the semantic effects of its context. We test our approach on six different benchmarks for the word similarity task, showing that our approach can produce state-of-the-art results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-21T16:22:34Z)
• SLM: Learning a Discourse Language Representation with Sentence Unshuffling [53.42814722621715]
  We introduce Sentence-level Language Modeling, a new pre-training objective for learning a discourse language representation. We show that this feature of our model improves the performance of the original BERT by large margins.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-30T13:33:41Z)
• Cross-lingual Spoken Language Understanding with Regularized Representation Alignment [71.53159402053392]
  We propose a regularization approach to align word-level and sentence-level representations across languages without any external resource. Experiments on the cross-lingual spoken language understanding task show that our model outperforms current state-of-the-art methods in both few-shot and zero-shot scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-30T08:56:53Z)
• Analysing Lexical Semantic Change with Contextualised Word Representations [7.071298726856781]
  We propose a novel method that exploits the BERT neural language model to obtain representations of word usages. We create a new evaluation dataset and show that the model representations and the detected semantic shifts are positively correlated with human judgements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-29T12:18:14Z)
• How Far are We from Effective Context Modeling? An Exploratory Study on Semantic Parsing in Context [59.13515950353125]
  We present a grammar-based decoding semantic parsing and adapt typical context modeling methods on top of it. We evaluate 13 context modeling methods on two large cross-domain datasets, and our best model achieves state-of-the-art performances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-03T11:28:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.