PAQ: 65 Million Probably-Asked Questions and What You Can Do With Them

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.07033v1
• Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 23:43:45 GMT
• Title: PAQ: 65 Million Probably-Asked Questions and What You Can Do With Them
• Authors: Patrick Lewis and Yuxiang Wu and Linqing Liu and Pasquale Minervini and Heinrich K\"uttler and Aleksandra Piktus and Pontus Stenetorp and Sebastian Riedel
• Abstract summary: Open-domain Question Answering models which directly leverage question-answer (QA) pairs show promise in terms of speed and memory. We introduce a new QA-pair retriever, RePAQ, to complement PAQ. We find that PAQ preempts and caches test questions, enabling RePAQ to match the accuracy of recent retrieve-and-read models.
• Score: 70.09741980324912
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Open-domain Question Answering models which directly leverage question-answer (QA) pairs, such as closed-book QA (CBQA) models and QA-pair retrievers, show promise in terms of speed and memory compared to conventional models which retrieve and read from text corpora. QA-pair retrievers also offer interpretable answers, a high degree of control, and are trivial to update at test time with new knowledge. However, these models lack the accuracy of retrieve-and-read systems, as substantially less knowledge is covered by the available QA-pairs relative to text corpora like Wikipedia. To facilitate improved QA-pair models, we introduce Probably Asked Questions (PAQ), a very large resource of 65M automatically-generated QA-pairs. We introduce a new QA-pair retriever, RePAQ, to complement PAQ. We find that PAQ preempts and caches test questions, enabling RePAQ to match the accuracy of recent retrieve-and-read models, whilst being significantly faster. Using PAQ, we train CBQA models which outperform comparable baselines by 5%, but trail RePAQ by over 15%, indicating the effectiveness of explicit retrieval. RePAQ can be configured for size (under 500MB) or speed (over 1K questions per second) whilst retaining high accuracy. Lastly, we demonstrate RePAQ's strength at selective QA, abstaining from answering when it is likely to be incorrect. This enables RePAQ to ``back-off" to a more expensive state-of-the-art model, leading to a combined system which is both more accurate and 2x faster than the state-of-the-art model alone.

Related papers

• Reinforced Question Rewriting for Conversational Question Answering [25.555372505026526]
  We develop a model to rewrite conversational questions into self-contained ones. It allows using existing single-turn QA systems to avoid training a CQA model from scratch. We propose using QA feedback to supervise the rewriting model with reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-27T21:23:36Z)
• Relation-Guided Pre-Training for Open-Domain Question Answering [67.86958978322188]
  We propose a Relation-Guided Pre-Training (RGPT-QA) framework to solve complex open-domain questions. We show that RGPT-QA achieves 2.2%, 2.4%, and 6.3% absolute improvement in Exact Match accuracy on Natural Questions, TriviaQA, and WebQuestions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-21T17:59:31Z)
• Will this Question be Answered? Question Filtering via Answer Model Distillation for Efficient Question Answering [99.66470885217623]
  We propose a novel approach towards improving the efficiency of Question Answering (QA) systems by filtering out questions that will not be answered by them. This is based on an interesting new finding: the answer confidence scores of state-of-the-art QA systems can be approximated well by models solely using the input question text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-14T23:07:49Z)
• Summary-Oriented Question Generation for Informational Queries [23.72999724312676]
  We aim to produce self-explanatory questions that focus on main document topics and are answerable with variable length passages as appropriate. Our model shows SOTA performance of SQ generation on the NQ dataset (20.1 BLEU-4). We further apply our model on out-of-domain news articles, evaluating with a QA system due to the lack of gold questions and demonstrate that our model produces better SQs for news articles -- with further confirmation via a human evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T17:30:08Z)
• Counterfactual Variable Control for Robust and Interpretable Question Answering [57.25261576239862]
  Deep neural network based question answering (QA) models are neither robust nor explainable in many cases. In this paper, we inspect such spurious "capability" of QA models using causal inference. We propose a novel approach called Counterfactual Variable Control (CVC) that explicitly mitigates any shortcut correlation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-12T10:09:05Z)
• Harvesting and Refining Question-Answer Pairs for Unsupervised QA [95.9105154311491]
  We introduce two approaches to improve unsupervised Question Answering (QA) First, we harvest lexically and syntactically divergent questions from Wikipedia to automatically construct a corpus of question-answer pairs (named as RefQA) Second, we take advantage of the QA model to extract more appropriate answers, which iteratively refines data over RefQA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-06T15:56:06Z)
• Template-Based Question Generation from Retrieved Sentences for Improved Unsupervised Question Answering [98.48363619128108]
  We propose an unsupervised approach to training QA models with generated pseudo-training data. We show that generating questions for QA training by applying a simple template on a related, retrieved sentence rather than the original context sentence improves downstream QA performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-24T17:57:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.