On the Utility of Gradient Compression in Distributed Training Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.00543v2
• Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 21:30:45 GMT
• Title: On the Utility of Gradient Compression in Distributed Training Systems
• Authors: Saurabh Agarwal, Hongyi Wang, Shivaram Venkataraman, Dimitris Papailiopoulos
• Abstract summary: We evaluate the efficacy of gradient compression methods and compare their scalability with optimized implementations of synchronous data-parallel SGD. Surprisingly, we observe that due to computation overheads introduced by gradient compression, the net speedup over vanilla data-parallel training is marginal, if not negative.
• Score: 9.017890174185872
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Rapid growth in data sets and the scale of neural network architectures have rendered distributed training a necessity. A rich body of prior work has highlighted the existence of communication bottlenecks in synchronous data-parallel training. To alleviate these bottlenecks, the machine learning community has largely focused on developing gradient and model compression methods. In parallel, the systems community has adopted several High Performance Computing (HPC)techniques to speed up distributed training. In this work, we evaluate the efficacy of gradient compression methods and compare their scalability with optimized implementations of synchronous data-parallel SGD. Surprisingly, we observe that due to computation overheads introduced by gradient compression, the net speedup over vanilla data-parallel training is marginal, if not negative. We conduct an extensive investigation to identify the root causes of this phenomenon, and offer a performance model that can be used to identify the benefits of gradient compression for a variety of system setups. Based on our analysis, we propose a list of desirable properties that gradient compression methods should satisfy, in order for them to provide a meaningful end-to-end speedup

Related papers

• Accelerating Distributed Deep Learning using Lossless Homomorphic Compression [17.654138014999326]
  We introduce a novel compression algorithm that effectively merges worker-level compression with in-network aggregation. We show up to a 6.33$times$ improvement in aggregation throughput and a 3.74$times$ increase in per-iteration training speed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T09:57:47Z)
• Does compressing activations help model parallel training? [64.59298055364336]
  We present the first empirical study on the effectiveness of compression methods for model parallelism. We implement and evaluate three common classes of compression algorithms. We evaluate these methods across more than 160 settings and 8 popular datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-06T18:58:09Z)
• Dynamic Network-Assisted D2D-Aided Coded Distributed Learning [59.29409589861241]
  We propose a novel device-to-device (D2D)-aided coded federated learning method (D2D-CFL) for load balancing across devices. We derive an optimal compression rate for achieving minimum processing time and establish its connection with the convergence time. Our proposed method is beneficial for real-time collaborative applications, where the users continuously generate training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-26T18:44:59Z)
• Quantization for Distributed Optimization [0.0]
  We present a set of all-reduce gradient compatible compression schemes which significantly reduce the communication overhead while maintaining the performance of vanilla SGD. Our compression methods perform better than the in-built methods currently offered by the deep learning frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-26T05:16:12Z)
• Compressed Communication for Distributed Training: Adaptive Methods and System [13.244482588437972]
  Communication overhead severely hinders the scalability of distributed machine learning systems. Recently, there has been a growing interest in using gradient compression to reduce the communication overhead. In this paper, we first introduce a novel adaptive gradient method with gradient compression.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-17T13:41:47Z)
• An Efficient Statistical-based Gradient Compression Technique for Distributed Training Systems [77.88178159830905]
  Sparsity-Inducing Distribution-based Compression (SIDCo) is a threshold-based sparsification scheme that enjoys similar threshold estimation quality to deep gradient compression (DGC) Our evaluation shows SIDCo speeds up training by up to 41:7%, 7:6%, and 1:9% compared to the no-compression baseline, Topk, and DGC compressors, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-26T13:06:00Z)
• Stochastic Optimization with Laggard Data Pipelines [65.20044914532221]
  We show that "dataechoed" extensions of common optimization methods exhibit provable improvements over their synchronous counterparts. Specifically, we show that in convex optimization with minibatches, data echoing affords speedups on the curvature-dominated part of the convergence rate, while maintaining the optimal statistical rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-26T14:55:31Z)
• Sparse Communication for Training Deep Networks [56.441077560085475]
  Synchronous gradient descent (SGD) is the most common method used for distributed training of deep learning models. In this algorithm, each worker shares its local gradients with others and updates the parameters using the average gradients of all workers. We study several compression schemes and identify how three key parameters affect the performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-19T17:28:11Z)
• DaSGD: Squeezing SGD Parallelization Performance in Distributed Training Using Delayed Averaging [4.652668321425679]
  Minibatch gradient descent (SGD) algorithm requires workers to halt forward/back propagations. DaSGD parallelizes SGD and forward/back propagations to hide 100% of the communication overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-31T05:43:50Z)
• Understanding the Effects of Data Parallelism and Sparsity on Neural Network Training [126.49572353148262]
  We study two factors in neural network training: data parallelism and sparsity. Despite their promising benefits, understanding of their effects on neural network training remains elusive.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-25T10:49:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.