Requirement Analyses and Evaluations of Blockchain Platforms per
Possible Use Cases
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.03209v1
- Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 18:27:57 GMT
- Title: Requirement Analyses and Evaluations of Blockchain Platforms per
Possible Use Cases
- Authors: Kenji Saito, Akimitsu Shiseki, Mitsuyasu Takada, Hiroki Yamamoto,
Masaaki Saitoh, Hiroaki Ohkawa, Hirofumi Andou, Naotake Miyamoto, Kazuaki
Yamakawa, Kiyoshi Kurakawa, Tomohiro Yabushita, Yuji Yamada, Go Masuda,
Kazuyuki Masuda
- Abstract summary: This document provides a generic model of understanding blockchain and its applications.
We evaluate and compare the following platforms: Hyperledger Fabric, Hyperledger Iroha, Hyperledger Indy, Quorum/Hyperledger Besu, Polkadot, Corda and BBc-1.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: It is said that blockchain will contribute to the digital transformation of
society in a wide range of ways, from the management of public and private
documents to the traceability in various industries, as well as digital
currencies. A number of so-called blockchain platforms have been developed, and
experiments and applications have been carried out on them. But are these
platforms really conducive to practical use of the blockchain concept?
To answer the question, we need to better understand what the technology
called blockchain really is. We need to sort out the confusion we see in
understanding what blockchain was invented for and what it means. We also need
to clarify the structure of its applications.
This document provides a generic model of understanding blockchain and its
applications. We introduce design patterns to classify the platforms. We
categorize possible use cases by identifying the structure among applications,
and organize the functional, performance, operational and legal requirements
for each such case.
Based on the categorization and criteria, we evaluated and compared the
following platforms: Hyperledger Fabric, Hyperledger Iroha, Hyperledger Indy,
Ethereum, Quorum/Hyperledger Besu, Ethereum 2.0, Polkadot, Corda and BBc-1. We
have tried to be fair in our evaluations and comparisons, but we also expect to
provoke discussion.
The intended readers for this document is anyone involved in development of
application systems who wants to understand blockchain and their platforms,
including non-engineers and non-technologists. The assessments in this document
will allow readers to understand the technological requirements for the
blockchain platforms, to question existing technologies, and to choose the
appropriate platforms for the applications they envision. The comparisons
hopefully will also be useful as a guide for designing new technologies.
Related papers
- Mastering AI: Big Data, Deep Learning, and the Evolution of Large Language Models -- Blockchain and Applications [17.293955748551053]
The article begins with an introduction to cryptography fundamentals.
It covers topics such as proof-of-work, proof-of-stake, and smart contracts.
The article concludes by addressing the current state of academic research on blockchain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-14T02:56:36Z) - The Latency Price of Threshold Cryptosystem in Blockchains [52.359230560289745]
We study the interplay between threshold cryptography and a class of blockchains that use Byzantine-fault tolerant (BFT) consensus protocols.
Existing approaches for threshold cryptosystems introduce a latency overhead of at least one message delay for running the threshold cryptographic protocol.
We propose a mechanism to eliminate this overhead for blockchain-native threshold cryptosystems with tight thresholds.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-16T20:53:04Z) - IT Strategic alignment in the decentralized finance (DeFi): CBDC and digital currencies [49.1574468325115]
Decentralized finance (DeFi) is a disruptive-based financial infrastructure.
This paper seeks to answer two main questions 1) What are the common IT elements in the DeFi?
And 2) How the elements to the IT strategic alignment in DeFi?
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-17T10:19:20Z) - Enhancing Trust and Privacy in Distributed Networks: A Comprehensive Survey on Blockchain-based Federated Learning [51.13534069758711]
Decentralized approaches like blockchain offer a compelling solution by implementing a consensus mechanism among multiple entities.
Federated Learning (FL) enables participants to collaboratively train models while safeguarding data privacy.
This paper investigates the synergy between blockchain's security features and FL's privacy-preserving model training capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-28T07:08:26Z) - Generative AI-enabled Blockchain Networks: Fundamentals, Applications,
and Case Study [73.87110604150315]
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) has emerged as a promising solution to address challenges of blockchain technology.
In this paper, we first introduce GAI techniques, outline their applications, and discuss existing solutions for integrating GAI into blockchains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-28T10:46:17Z) - PBL: System for Creating and Maintaining Personal Blockchain Ledgers [3.5897534810405403]
This work presents a novel architecture for creating and maintaining personal blockchain ledgers.
Our system utilizes independent modular services, enabling individuals to securely store their data in a personal blockchain ledger.
Using rigorous mathematical methods, we prove that our system produces append-only, immutable, tamper-evident, tamper-resistant ledgers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-08T14:17:27Z) - Novel Architecture to Create and Maintain Personal Blockchains [0.685316573653194]
We outline a potential blockchain use case for tracking financial transactions across multiple financial institutions.
We show the downsides of traditional centralized approaches and that blockchain approaches fail to give all the privacy and accessibility required for this use case.
This novel architecture combines the ease of use of public blockchains with the privacy of private blockchains by allowing users to create personal blockchains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-12T02:05:59Z) - Analysis of Arbitrary Content on Blockchain-Based Systems using BigQuery [0.0]
We develop and apply a cloud-based approach for quickly discovering and classifying content on public blockchains.
Our method can be adapted to different blockchain systems and offers insights into content-related usage patterns and potential cases of abuse.
To the best of our knowledge, the presented study is the first to systematically analyze non-financial content stored on the blockchain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-17T15:12:38Z) - SoK: Blockchain Governance [13.95507600720467]
The topic of blockchain governance is a fertile domain for a thorough systematization.
We start by distilling a comprehensive array of properties for sound governance systems.
While all properties are satisfied, even partially, by at least one system, no system that most of them.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-18T18:38:26Z) - Quantum-resistance in blockchain networks [46.63333997460008]
This paper describes the work carried out by the Inter-American Development Bank, the IDB Lab, LACChain, Quantum Computing (CQC), and Tecnologico de Monterrey to identify and eliminate quantum threats in blockchain networks.
The advent of quantum computing threatens internet protocols and blockchain networks because they utilize non-quantum resistant cryptographic algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-11T23:39:25Z) - Quantum Multi-Solution Bernoulli Search with Applications to Bitcoin's
Post-Quantum Security [67.06003361150228]
A proof of work (PoW) is an important cryptographic construct enabling a party to convince others that they invested some effort in solving a computational task.
In this work, we examine the hardness of finding such chain of PoWs against quantum strategies.
We prove that the chain of PoWs problem reduces to a problem we call multi-solution Bernoulli search, for which we establish its quantum query complexity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-30T18:03:56Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.