Adaptive Agent Architecture for Real-time Human-Agent Teaming

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.04439v1
• Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2021 20:08:09 GMT
• Title: Adaptive Agent Architecture for Real-time Human-Agent Teaming
• Authors: Tianwei Ni, Huao Li, Siddharth Agrawal, Suhas Raja, Fan Jia, Yikang Gui, Dana Hughes, Michael Lewis, Katia Sycara
• Abstract summary: It is critical that agents infer human intent and adapt their polices for smooth coordination. Most literature in human-agent teaming builds agents referencing a learned human model. We propose a novel adaptive agent architecture in human-model-free setting on a two-player cooperative game.
• Score: 3.284216428330814
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Teamwork is a set of interrelated reasoning, actions and behaviors of team members that facilitate common objectives. Teamwork theory and experiments have resulted in a set of states and processes for team effectiveness in both human-human and agent-agent teams. However, human-agent teaming is less well studied because it is so new and involves asymmetry in policy and intent not present in human teams. To optimize team performance in human-agent teaming, it is critical that agents infer human intent and adapt their polices for smooth coordination. Most literature in human-agent teaming builds agents referencing a learned human model. Though these agents are guaranteed to perform well with the learned model, they lay heavy assumptions on human policy such as optimality and consistency, which is unlikely in many real-world scenarios. In this paper, we propose a novel adaptive agent architecture in human-model-free setting on a two-player cooperative game, namely Team Space Fortress (TSF). Previous human-human team research have shown complementary policies in TSF game and diversity in human players' skill, which encourages us to relax the assumptions on human policy. Therefore, we discard learning human models from human data, and instead use an adaptation strategy on a pre-trained library of exemplar policies composed of RL algorithms or rule-based methods with minimal assumptions of human behavior. The adaptation strategy relies on a novel similarity metric to infer human policy and then selects the most complementary policy in our library to maximize the team performance. The adaptive agent architecture can be deployed in real-time and generalize to any off-the-shelf static agents. We conducted human-agent experiments to evaluate the proposed adaptive agent framework, and demonstrated the suboptimality, diversity, and adaptability of human policies in human-agent teams.

Related papers

• PersLLM: A Personified Training Approach for Large Language Models [66.16513246245401]
  We propose PersLLM, integrating psychology-grounded principles of personality: social practice, consistency, and dynamic development. We incorporate personality traits directly into the model parameters, enhancing the model's resistance to induction, promoting consistency, and supporting the dynamic evolution of personality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T08:13:22Z)
• Mixed-Initiative Human-Robot Teaming under Suboptimality with Online Bayesian Adaptation [0.6591036379613505]
  We develop computational modeling and optimization techniques for enhancing the performance of suboptimal human-agent teams. We adopt an online Bayesian approach that enables a robot to infer people's willingness to comply with its assistance in a sequential decision-making game. Our user studies show that user preferences and team performance indeed vary with robot intervention styles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-24T14:38:18Z)
• Incorporating Human Flexibility through Reward Preferences in Human-AI Teaming [14.250120245287109]
  We develop a Human-AI PbRL Cooperation Game, where the RL agent queries the human-in-the-loop to elicit task objective and human's preferences on the joint team behavior. Under this game formulation, we first introduce the notion of Human Flexibility to evaluate team performance based on if humans prefer to follow a fixed policy or adapt to the RL agent on the fly. We highlight a special case along these two dimensions, which we call Specified Orchestration, where the human is least flexible and agent has complete access to human policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-21T20:48:15Z)
• ProAgent: Building Proactive Cooperative Agents with Large Language Models [89.53040828210945]
  ProAgent is a novel framework that harnesses large language models to create proactive agents. ProAgent can analyze the present state, and infer the intentions of teammates from observations. ProAgent exhibits a high degree of modularity and interpretability, making it easily integrated into various coordination scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-22T10:36:56Z)
• PECAN: Leveraging Policy Ensemble for Context-Aware Zero-Shot Human-AI Coordination [52.991211077362586]
  We propose a policy ensemble method to increase the diversity of partners in the population. We then develop a context-aware method enabling the ego agent to analyze and identify the partner's potential policy primitives. In this way, the ego agent is able to learn more universal cooperative behaviors for collaborating with diverse partners.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-16T12:14:58Z)
• Maximum Entropy Population Based Training for Zero-Shot Human-AI Coordination [21.800115245671737]
  We consider the problem of training a Reinforcement Learning (RL) agent without using any human data to make it capable of collaborating with humans. We derive a centralized population entropy objective to facilitate learning of a diverse population of agents, which is later used to train a robust agent to collaborate with unseen partners.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-22T07:19:36Z)
• Collaborating with Humans without Human Data [6.158826414652401]
  We study the problem of how to train agents that collaborate well with human partners without using human data. We train our agent partner as the best response to a population of self-play agents and their past checkpoints. We find that Fictitious Co-Play (FCP) agents score significantly higher than SP, PP, and BCP when paired with novel agent and human partners.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-15T16:03:57Z)
• Policy Fusion for Adaptive and Customizable Reinforcement Learning Agents [137.86426963572214]
  We show how to combine distinct behavioral policies to obtain a meaningful "fusion" policy. We propose four different policy fusion methods for combining pre-trained policies. We provide several practical examples and use-cases for how these methods are indeed useful for video game production and designers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-21T16:08:44Z)
• Learning Latent Representations to Influence Multi-Agent Interaction [65.44092264843538]
  We propose a reinforcement learning-based framework for learning latent representations of an agent's policy. We show that our approach outperforms the alternatives and learns to influence the other agent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-12T19:04:26Z)
• Cooperative Inverse Reinforcement Learning [64.60722062217417]
  We propose a formal definition of the value alignment problem as cooperative reinforcement learning (CIRL) A CIRL problem is a cooperative, partial-information game with two agents human and robot; both are rewarded according to the human's reward function, but the robot does not initially know what this is. In contrast to classical IRL, where the human is assumed to act optimally in isolation, optimal CIRL solutions produce behaviors such as active teaching, active learning, and communicative actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2016-06-09T22:39:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.