Performance Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Detection on Various Trained
Neural Networks
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.15580v1
- Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 12:52:02 GMT
- Title: Performance Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Detection on Various Trained
Neural Networks
- Authors: Jens Henriksson, Christian Berger, Markus Borg, Lars Tornberg, Sankar
Raman Sathyamoorthy, Cristofer Englund
- Abstract summary: A common challenge for Deep Neural Networks (DNN) occur when exposed to out-of-distribution samples that are previously unseen.
In this paper we analyse two supervisors on two well-known DNNs with varied setups of training.
We find that the outlier detection performance improves with the quality of the training procedure.
- Score: 12.22753756637137
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Several areas have been improved with Deep Learning during the past years.
For non-safety related products adoption of AI and ML is not an issue, whereas
in safety critical applications, robustness of such approaches is still an
issue. A common challenge for Deep Neural Networks (DNN) occur when exposed to
out-of-distribution samples that are previously unseen, where DNNs can yield
high confidence predictions despite no prior knowledge of the input.
In this paper we analyse two supervisors on two well-known DNNs with varied
setups of training and find that the outlier detection performance improves
with the quality of the training procedure. We analyse the performance of the
supervisor after each epoch during the training cycle, to investigate
supervisor performance as the accuracy converges. Understanding the
relationship between training results and supervisor performance is valuable to
improve robustness of the model and indicates where more work has to be done to
create generalized models for safety critical applications.
Related papers
- Understanding the Role of Training Data in Test-Time Scaling [56.12341509545198]
We study the performance of test-time scaling for transformers trained on an in-context weight prediction task for linear regression.<n>We show that training on a diverse, relevant, and hard set of tasks results in best performance for test-time scaling.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-04T01:38:48Z) - Assessing the Potential for Catastrophic Failure in Dynamic Post-Training Quantization [3.437656066916039]
Post-training quantization (PTQ) has emerged as an effective tool for reducing the computational complexity and memory usage of a neural network.<n>There is the potential for drastic performance reduction depending upon the distribution of inputs experienced in inference.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-02T18:13:06Z) - Addressing Imbalanced Domain-Incremental Learning through Dual-Balance Collaborative Experts [59.615381619866284]
Domain-Incremental Learning (DIL) focuses on continual learning in non-stationary environments.<n>DIL faces two critical challenges in the context of imbalanced data: intra-domain class imbalance and cross-domain class distribution shifts.<n>We introduce the Dual-Balance Collaborative Experts (DCE) framework to overcome these challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-09T17:57:07Z) - Dissecting Deep RL with High Update Ratios: Combatting Value Divergence [21.282292112642747]
We show that deep reinforcement learning algorithms can retain their ability to learn without resetting network parameters.
We employ a simple unit-ball normalization that enables learning under large update ratios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-09T19:56:40Z) - Analyzing Adversarial Inputs in Deep Reinforcement Learning [53.3760591018817]
We present a comprehensive analysis of the characterization of adversarial inputs, through the lens of formal verification.
We introduce a novel metric, the Adversarial Rate, to classify models based on their susceptibility to such perturbations.
Our analysis empirically demonstrates how adversarial inputs can affect the safety of a given DRL system with respect to such perturbations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-07T21:58:40Z) - Deep Neural Networks Tend To Extrapolate Predictably [51.303814412294514]
neural network predictions tend to be unpredictable and overconfident when faced with out-of-distribution (OOD) inputs.
We observe that neural network predictions often tend towards a constant value as input data becomes increasingly OOD.
We show how one can leverage our insights in practice to enable risk-sensitive decision-making in the presence of OOD inputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-02T03:25:32Z) - TWINS: A Fine-Tuning Framework for Improved Transferability of
Adversarial Robustness and Generalization [89.54947228958494]
This paper focuses on the fine-tuning of an adversarially pre-trained model in various classification tasks.
We propose a novel statistics-based approach, Two-WIng NormliSation (TWINS) fine-tuning framework.
TWINS is shown to be effective on a wide range of image classification datasets in terms of both generalization and robustness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-20T14:12:55Z) - Iterative Assessment and Improvement of DNN Operational Accuracy [11.447394702830412]
We propose DAIC (DNN Assessment and Improvement Cycle), an approach which combines ''low-cost'' online pseudo-oracles and ''high-cost'' offline sampling techniques.
Preliminary results show the benefits of combining the two approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-02T14:21:54Z) - Adversarial training with informed data selection [53.19381941131439]
Adrial training is the most efficient solution to defend the network against these malicious attacks.
This work proposes a data selection strategy to be applied in the mini-batch training.
The simulation results show that a good compromise can be obtained regarding robustness and standard accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-07T12:09:50Z) - Learning Dynamics and Generalization in Reinforcement Learning [59.530058000689884]
We show theoretically that temporal difference learning encourages agents to fit non-smooth components of the value function early in training.
We show that neural networks trained using temporal difference algorithms on dense reward tasks exhibit weaker generalization between states than randomly networks and gradient networks trained with policy methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-05T08:49:16Z) - Performance Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Detection on Trained Neural
Networks [8.934898793972879]
We analyze three methods that separate between in- and out-of-distribution data, called supervisors, on four well-known Deep Learning architectures.
We find that the outlier detection performance improves with the quality of the model.
We observe that understanding the relationship between training results and supervisor performance is crucial to improve the model's robustness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-26T15:24:38Z) - Neural Network Repair with Reachability Analysis [10.384532888747993]
Safety is a critical concern for the next generation of autonomy that is likely to rely heavily on deep neural networks for perception and control.
This research proposes a framework to repair unsafe DNNs in safety-critical systems with reachability analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-09T17:56:51Z) - Federated Learning with Unreliable Clients: Performance Analysis and
Mechanism Design [76.29738151117583]
Federated Learning (FL) has become a promising tool for training effective machine learning models among distributed clients.
However, low quality models could be uploaded to the aggregator server by unreliable clients, leading to a degradation or even a collapse of training.
We model these unreliable behaviors of clients and propose a defensive mechanism to mitigate such a security risk.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-10T08:02:27Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.