An Empirical Comparison of Instance Attribution Methods for NLP

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.04128v1
• Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 01:03:17 GMT
• Title: An Empirical Comparison of Instance Attribution Methods for NLP
• Authors: Pouya Pezeshkpour, Sarthak Jain, Byron C. Wallace and Sameer Singh
• Abstract summary: We evaluate the degree to which different potential instance attribution agree with respect to the importance of training samples. We find that simple retrieval methods yield training instances that differ from those identified via gradient-based methods.
• Score: 62.63504976810927
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Widespread adoption of deep models has motivated a pressing need for approaches to interpret network outputs and to facilitate model debugging. Instance attribution methods constitute one means of accomplishing these goals by retrieving training instances that (may have) led to a particular prediction. Influence functions (IF; Koh and Liang 2017) provide machinery for doing this by quantifying the effect that perturbing individual train instances would have on a specific test prediction. However, even approximating the IF is computationally expensive, to the degree that may be prohibitive in many cases. Might simpler approaches (e.g., retrieving train examples most similar to a given test point) perform comparably? In this work, we evaluate the degree to which different potential instance attribution agree with respect to the importance of training samples. We find that simple retrieval methods yield training instances that differ from those identified via gradient-based methods (such as IFs), but that nonetheless exhibit desirable characteristics similar to more complex attribution methods. Code for all methods and experiments in this paper is available at: https://github.com/successar/instance_attributions_NLP.

Related papers

• Scalable Influence and Fact Tracing for Large Language Model Pretraining [14.598556308631018]
  Training data attribution (TDA) methods aim to attribute model outputs back to specific training examples. This paper refines existing gradient-based methods to work effectively at scale.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T20:39:21Z)
• BoostAdapter: Improving Vision-Language Test-Time Adaptation via Regional Bootstrapping [64.8477128397529]
  We propose a training-required and training-free test-time adaptation framework. We maintain a light-weight key-value memory for feature retrieval from instance-agnostic historical samples and instance-aware boosting samples. We theoretically justify the rationality behind our method and empirically verify its effectiveness on both the out-of-distribution and the cross-domain datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-20T15:58:43Z)
• Rethinking Classifier Re-Training in Long-Tailed Recognition: A Simple Logits Retargeting Approach [102.0769560460338]
  We develop a simple logits approach (LORT) without the requirement of prior knowledge of the number of samples per class. Our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on various imbalanced datasets, including CIFAR100-LT, ImageNet-LT, and iNaturalist 2018.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-01T03:27:08Z)
• Simfluence: Modeling the Influence of Individual Training Examples by Simulating Training Runs [27.314239745883967]
  Training data attribution (TDA) methods trace a model's prediction on any given example back to specific influential training examples. We propose Simfluence, a new paradigm for TDA where the goal is not to produce a single influence score per example, but instead a training run simulator. Simfluence captures non-additive interactions and is often able to predict the spiky trajectory of individual example losses with surprising fidelity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-14T17:47:25Z)
• A Maximum Log-Likelihood Method for Imbalanced Few-Shot Learning Tasks [3.2895195535353308]
  We propose a new maximum log-likelihood metric for few-shot architectures. We demonstrate that the proposed metric achieves superior performance accuracy w.r.t. conventional similarity metrics. We also show that our algorithm achieves state-of-the-art transductive few-shot performance when the evaluation data is imbalanced.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-26T21:31:00Z)
• An Additive Instance-Wise Approach to Multi-class Model Interpretation [53.87578024052922]
  Interpretable machine learning offers insights into what factors drive a certain prediction of a black-box system. Existing methods mainly focus on selecting explanatory input features, which follow either locally additive or instance-wise approaches. This work exploits the strengths of both methods and proposes a global framework for learning local explanations simultaneously for multiple target classes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-07T06:50:27Z)
• Combining Feature and Instance Attribution to Detect Artifacts [62.63504976810927]
  We propose methods to facilitate identification of training data artifacts. We show that this proposed training-feature attribution approach can be used to uncover artifacts in training data. We execute a small user study to evaluate whether these methods are useful to NLP researchers in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-01T09:26:13Z)
• Multi-Scale Positive Sample Refinement for Few-Shot Object Detection [61.60255654558682]
  Few-shot object detection (FSOD) helps detectors adapt to unseen classes with few training instances. We propose a Multi-scale Positive Sample Refinement (MPSR) approach to enrich object scales in FSOD. MPSR generates multi-scale positive samples as object pyramids and refines the prediction at various scales.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-18T09:48:29Z)
• An end-to-end approach for the verification problem: learning the right distance [15.553424028461885]
  We augment the metric learning setting by introducing a parametric pseudo-distance, trained jointly with the encoder. We first show it approximates a likelihood ratio which can be used for hypothesis tests. We observe training is much simplified under the proposed approach compared to metric learning with actual distances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-21T18:46:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.