The Burden of Being a Bridge: Analysing Subjective Well-Being of Twitter
Users during the COVID-19 Pandemic
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.04331v2
- Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2022 11:50:51 GMT
- Title: The Burden of Being a Bridge: Analysing Subjective Well-Being of Twitter
Users during the COVID-19 Pandemic
- Authors: Ninghan Chen, Xihui Chen, Zhiqiang Zhong, Jun Pang
- Abstract summary: We study the impact of the pandemic on the mental health of influential social media users.
We analyse whether SWB changes have a relationship with their bridging performance in information diffusion.
With the data collected from Twitter for almost two years, we reveal the greater mental suffering of influential users during the COVID-19 pandemic.
- Score: 4.178929174617172
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic triggers infodemic over online social
media, which significantly impacts public health around the world, both
physically and psychologically. In this paper, we study the impact of the
pandemic on the mental health of influential social media users, whose sharing
behaviours significantly promote the diffusion of COVID-19 related information.
Specifically, we focus on subjective well-being (SWB), and analyse whether SWB
changes have a relationship with their bridging performance in information
diffusion, which measures the speed and wideness gain of information
transmission due to their sharing. We accurately capture users' bridging
performance by proposing a new measurement. Benefiting from deep-learning
natural language processing models, we quantify social media users' SWB from
their textual posts. With the data collected from Twitter for almost two years,
we reveal the greater mental suffering of influential users during the COVID-19
pandemic. Through comprehensive hierarchical multiple regression analysis, we
are the first to discover the strong {relationship} between social users' SWB
and their bridging performance.
Related papers
- Decoding the Silent Majority: Inducing Belief Augmented Social Graph
with Large Language Model for Response Forecasting [74.68371461260946]
SocialSense is a framework that induces a belief-centered graph on top of an existent social network, along with graph-based propagation to capture social dynamics.
Our method surpasses existing state-of-the-art in experimental evaluations for both zero-shot and supervised settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-20T06:17:02Z) - Adherence to Misinformation on Social Media Through Socio-Cognitive and
Group-Based Processes [79.79659145328856]
We argue that when misinformation proliferates, this happens because the social media environment enables adherence to misinformation.
We make the case that polarization and misinformation adherence are closely tied.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-30T12:34:24Z) - "COVID-19 was a FIFA conspiracy #curropt": An Investigation into the
Viral Spread of COVID-19 Misinformation [60.268682953952506]
We estimate the extent to which misinformation has influenced the course of the COVID-19 pandemic using natural language processing models.
We provide a strategy to combat social media posts that are likely to cause widespread harm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-12T19:41:01Z) - Characterizing User Susceptibility to COVID-19 Misinformation on Twitter [40.0762273487125]
This study attempts to answer it who constitutes the population vulnerable to the online misinformation in the pandemic.
We distinguish different types of users, ranging from social bots to humans with various level of engagement with COVID-related misinformation.
We then identify users' online features and situational predictors that correlate with their susceptibility to COVID-19 misinformation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-20T13:31:15Z) - News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation.
Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content.
The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z) - Debate on Online Social Networks at the Time of COVID-19: An Italian
Case Study [4.176752121302988]
We analyze how the interaction patterns around popular influencers in Italy changed during the first six months of 2020.
We collected a large dataset for this group of public figures, including more than 54 million comments on over 140 thousand posts.
We also analyze the user sentiment through the psycholinguistic properties of comments, and the results testified the rapid boom and disappearance of topics related to the pandemic.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-02T08:25:19Z) - COVID-19 and Big Data: Multi-faceted Analysis for Spatio-temporal
Understanding of the Pandemic with Social Media Conversations [4.07452542897703]
Social media platforms have served as a vehicle for the global conversation about COVID-19.
We present a framework for analysis, mining, and tracking the critical content and characteristics of social media conversations around the pandemic.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-22T00:45:50Z) - Causal Understanding of Fake News Dissemination on Social Media [50.4854427067898]
We argue that it is critical to understand what user attributes potentially cause users to share fake news.
In fake news dissemination, confounders can be characterized by fake news sharing behavior that inherently relates to user attributes and online activities.
We propose a principled approach to alleviating selection bias in fake news dissemination.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-20T19:37:04Z) - Information Consumption and Social Response in a Segregated Environment:
the Case of Gab [74.5095691235917]
This work provides a characterization of the interaction patterns within Gab around the COVID-19 topic.
We find that there are no strong statistical differences in the social response to questionable and reliable content.
Our results provide insights toward the understanding of coordinated inauthentic behavior and on the early-warning of information operation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-03T11:34:25Z) - Critical Impact of Social Networks Infodemic on Defeating Coronavirus
COVID-19 Pandemic: Twitter-Based Study and Research Directions [1.6571886312953874]
An estimated 2.95 billion people in 2019 used social media worldwide.
The widespread of the Coronavirus COVID-19 resulted with a tsunami of social media.
This paper presents a large-scale study based on data mined from Twitter.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-18T15:53:13Z) - Characterizing information leaders in Twitter during COVID-19 Pandemic [0.0]
Infodemic of misinformation is an important secondary crisis associated to the pandemic.
We propose a framework to characterize leaders in Twitter based on the analysis of the social graph derived from the activity in this social network.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-14T21:14:15Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.