Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivity

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.08786v1
• Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2021 09:29:16 GMT
• Title: Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivity
• Authors: Yao Lu, Max Bartolo, Alastair Moore, Sebastian Riedel, Pontus Stenetorp
• Abstract summary: When primed with only a handful of training samples, very large pretrained language models such as GPT-3, have shown competitive results. We demonstrate that the order in which the samples are provided can be the difference between near state-of-the-art and random guess performance. We use the generative nature of the language models to construct an artificial development set and based on entropy statistics of the candidate permutations from this set we identify performant prompts.
• Score: 16.893758238773263
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: When primed with only a handful of training samples, very large pretrained language models such as GPT-3, have shown competitive results when compared to fully-supervised fine-tuned large pretrained language models. We demonstrate that the order in which the samples are provided can be the difference between near state-of-the-art and random guess performance: Essentially some permutations are "fantastic" and some not. We analyse this phenomenon in detail, establishing that: it is present across model sizes (even for the largest current models), it is not related to a specific subset of samples, and that a given good permutation for one model is not transferable to another. While one could use a development set to determine which permutations are performant, this would deviate from the few-shot setting as it requires additional annotated data. Instead, we use the generative nature of the language models to construct an artificial development set and based on entropy statistics of the candidate permutations from this set we identify performant prompts. Our method improves upon GPT-family models by on average 13% relative across eleven different established text classification tasks.

Related papers

• Forcing Diffuse Distributions out of Language Models [70.28345569190388]
  Despite being trained specifically to follow user instructions, today's instructiontuned language models perform poorly when instructed to produce random outputs. We propose a fine-tuning method that encourages language models to output distributions that are diffuse over valid outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T19:17:23Z)
• Conformal Nucleus Sampling [67.5232384936661]
  We assess whether a top-$p$ set is indeed aligned with its probabilistic meaning in various linguistic contexts. We find that OPT models are overconfident, and that calibration shows a moderate inverse scaling with model size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-04T08:11:57Z)
• Efficient and Flexible Topic Modeling using Pretrained Embeddings and Bag of Sentences [1.8592384822257952]
  We propose a novel topic modeling and inference algorithm. We leverage pre-trained sentence embeddings by combining generative process models and clustering. TheTailor evaluation shows that our method yields state-of-the art results with relatively little computational demands.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T20:13:11Z)
• A Generative Language Model for Few-shot Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis [90.24921443175514]
  We focus on aspect-based sentiment analysis, which involves extracting aspect term, category, and predicting their corresponding polarities. We propose to reformulate the extraction and prediction tasks into the sequence generation task, using a generative language model with unidirectional attention. Our approach outperforms the previous state-of-the-art (based on BERT) on average performance by a large margins in few-shot and full-shot settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T18:31:53Z)
• Hierarchical Few-Shot Generative Models [18.216729811514718]
  We study a latent variables approach that extends the Neural Statistician to a fully hierarchical approach with an attention-based point to set-level aggregation. Our results show that the hierarchical formulation better captures the intrinsic variability within the sets in the small data regime.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-23T19:19:39Z)
• Unnatural Language Inference [48.45003475966808]
  We find that state-of-the-art NLI models, such as RoBERTa and BART, are invariant to, and sometimes even perform better on, examples with randomly reordered words. Our findings call into question the idea that our natural language understanding models, and the tasks used for measuring their progress, genuinely require a human-like understanding of syntax.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-30T20:40:48Z)
• Sparse Text Generation [7.747003493657217]
  Current text generators require sampling from a modified softmax, via temperature parameters or ad-hoc truncation techniques, as in top-$k$ or nucleus sampling. In this paper, we use the recently introduced entmax transformation to train and sample from a sparse language model, avoiding this mismatch. The result is a text generator with favorable performance in terms of fluency and consistency, fewer repetitions, and n-gram diversity closer to human text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-06T13:09:10Z)
• Document Ranking with a Pretrained Sequence-to-Sequence Model [56.44269917346376]
  We show how a sequence-to-sequence model can be trained to generate relevance labels as "target words" Our approach significantly outperforms an encoder-only model in a data-poor regime.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-14T22:29:50Z)
• Parameter Space Factorization for Zero-Shot Learning across Tasks and Languages [112.65994041398481]
  We propose a Bayesian generative model for the space of neural parameters. We infer the posteriors over such latent variables based on data from seen task-language combinations. Our model yields comparable or better results than state-of-the-art, zero-shot cross-lingual transfer methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-30T16:58:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.