GEAR: On Optimal Decision Making with Auxiliary Data
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.10573v1
- Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 14:59:25 GMT
- Title: GEAR: On Optimal Decision Making with Auxiliary Data
- Authors: Hengrui Cai, Rui Song, Wenbin Lu
- Abstract summary: Current optimal decision rule (ODR) methods usually require the primary outcome of interest in samples for assessing treatment effects, namely the experimental sample.
This paper is inspired to address this challenge by making use of an auxiliary sample to facilitate the estimation of ODR in the experimental sample.
We propose an auGmented inverse propensity weighted Experimental and Auxiliary sample-based decision Rule (GEAR) by maximizing the augmented inverse propensity weighted value estimator over a class of decision rules.
- Score: 20.607673853640744
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Personalized optimal decision making, finding the optimal decision rule (ODR)
based on individual characteristics, has attracted increasing attention
recently in many fields, such as education, economics, and medicine. Current
ODR methods usually require the primary outcome of interest in samples for
assessing treatment effects, namely the experimental sample. However, in many
studies, treatments may have a long-term effect, and as such the primary
outcome of interest cannot be observed in the experimental sample due to the
limited duration of experiments, which makes the estimation of ODR impossible.
This paper is inspired to address this challenge by making use of an auxiliary
sample to facilitate the estimation of ODR in the experimental sample. We
propose an auGmented inverse propensity weighted Experimental and Auxiliary
sample-based decision Rule (GEAR) by maximizing the augmented inverse
propensity weighted value estimator over a class of decision rules using the
experimental sample, with the primary outcome being imputed based on the
auxiliary sample. The asymptotic properties of the proposed GEAR estimators and
their associated value estimators are established. Simulation studies are
conducted to demonstrate its empirical validity with a real AIDS application.
Related papers
- Adaptive Instrument Design for Indirect Experiments [48.815194906471405]
Unlike RCTs, indirect experiments estimate treatment effects by leveragingconditional instrumental variables.
In this paper we take the initial steps towards enhancing sample efficiency for indirect experiments by adaptively designing a data collection policy.
Our main contribution is a practical computational procedure that utilizes influence functions to search for an optimal data collection policy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-05T02:38:04Z) - Improved Policy Evaluation for Randomized Trials of Algorithmic Resource
Allocation [54.72195809248172]
We present a new estimator leveraging our proposed novel concept, that involves retrospective reshuffling of participants across experimental arms at the end of an RCT.
We prove theoretically that such an estimator is more accurate than common estimators based on sample means.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-06T05:17:22Z) - MetaRF: Differentiable Random Forest for Reaction Yield Prediction with
a Few Trails [58.47364143304643]
In this paper, we focus on the reaction yield prediction problem.
We first put forth MetaRF, an attention-based differentiable random forest model specially designed for the few-shot yield prediction.
To improve the few-shot learning performance, we further introduce a dimension-reduction based sampling method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-22T06:40:13Z) - Calibrated Optimal Decision Making with Multiple Data Sources and
Limited Outcome [20.60767385364074]
We consider the optimal decision-making problem in a primary sample of interest with multiple auxiliary sources available.
This paper proposes a novel calibrated optimal decision rule (CODR) to address the limited outcome.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-21T14:24:17Z) - Increasing the efficiency of randomized trial estimates via linear
adjustment for a prognostic score [59.75318183140857]
Estimating causal effects from randomized experiments is central to clinical research.
Most methods for historical borrowing achieve reductions in variance by sacrificing strict type-I error rate control.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-17T21:10:10Z) - The Adaptive Doubly Robust Estimator for Policy Evaluation in Adaptive
Experiments and a Paradox Concerning Logging Policy [13.772109618082382]
We propose a doubly robust (DR) estimator for dependent samples obtained from adaptive experiments.
We report an empirical paradox that our proposed DR estimator tends to show better performances compared to other estimators.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-08T06:42:48Z) - Enabling Counterfactual Survival Analysis with Balanced Representations [64.17342727357618]
Survival data are frequently encountered across diverse medical applications, i.e., drug development, risk profiling, and clinical trials.
We propose a theoretically grounded unified framework for counterfactual inference applicable to survival outcomes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-14T01:15:00Z) - Efficient Adaptive Experimental Design for Average Treatment Effect
Estimation [18.027128141189355]
We propose an algorithm for efficient experiments with estimators constructed from dependent samples.
To justify our proposed approach, we provide finite and infinite sample analyses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-13T02:04:17Z) - Generalization Bounds and Representation Learning for Estimation of
Potential Outcomes and Causal Effects [61.03579766573421]
We study estimation of individual-level causal effects, such as a single patient's response to alternative medication.
We devise representation learning algorithms that minimize our bound, by regularizing the representation's induced treatment group distance.
We extend these algorithms to simultaneously learn a weighted representation to further reduce treatment group distances.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-21T10:16:33Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.