Calibration of prediction rules for life-time outcomes using prognostic Cox regression survival models and multiple imputations to account for missing predictor data with cross-validatory assessment

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.01733v1
• Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 20:10:12 GMT
• Title: Calibration of prediction rules for life-time outcomes using prognostic Cox regression survival models and multiple imputations to account for missing predictor data with cross-validatory assessment
• Authors: Bart J. A. Mertens
• Abstract summary: Methods are described to combine imputation with predictive calibration in survival modeling subject to censoring. Prediction-averaging appears to have superior statistical properties, especially smaller predictive variation, as opposed to a direct application of Rubin's rules.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In this paper, we expand the methodology presented in Mertens et. al (2020, Biometrical Journal) to the study of life-time (survival) outcome which is subject to censoring and when imputation is used to account for missing values. We consider the problem where missing values can occur in both the calibration data as well as newly - to-be-predicted - observations (validation). We focus on the Cox model. Methods are described to combine imputation with predictive calibration in survival modeling subject to censoring. Application to cross-validation is discussed. We demonstrate how conclusions broadly confirm the first paper which restricted to the study of binary outcomes only. Specifically prediction-averaging appears to have superior statistical properties, especially smaller predictive variation, as opposed to a direct application of Rubin's rules. Distinct methods for dealing with the baseline hazards are discussed when using Rubin's rules-based approaches.

Related papers

• Pseudo-Observations and Super Learner for the Estimation of the Restricted Mean Survival Time [0.0]
  We propose a flexible and easy-to-use ensemble algorithm that combines pseudo-observations and super learner. We complement the predictions obtained from our method with our RMST-adapted risk measure, prediction intervals and variable importance measures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-26T07:38:10Z)
• Selective Nonparametric Regression via Testing [54.20569354303575]
  We develop an abstention procedure via testing the hypothesis on the value of the conditional variance at a given point. Unlike existing methods, the proposed one allows to account not only for the value of the variance itself but also for the uncertainty of the corresponding variance predictor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-28T13:04:11Z)
• Modeling High-Dimensional Data with Unknown Cut Points: A Fusion Penalized Logistic Threshold Regression [2.520538806201793]
  In traditional logistic regression models, the link function is often assumed to be linear and continuous in predictors. We consider a threshold model that all continuous features are discretized into ordinal levels, which further determine the binary responses. We find the lasso model is well suited in the problem of early detection and prediction for chronic disease like diabetes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-17T04:16:40Z)
• Benign-Overfitting in Conditional Average Treatment Effect Prediction with Linear Regression [14.493176427999028]
  We study the benign overfitting theory in the prediction of the conditional average treatment effect (CATE) with linear regression models. We show that the T-learner fails to achieve the consistency except the random assignment, while the IPW-learner converges the risk to zero if the propensity score is known.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-10T18:51:52Z)
• Bayesian analysis of the prevalence bias: learning and predicting from imbalanced data [10.659348599372944]
  This paper lays the theoretical and computational framework for training models, and for prediction, in the presence of prevalence bias. It offers an alternative to principled training losses and complements test-time procedures based on selecting an operating point from summary curves. It integrates seamlessly in the current paradigm of (deep) learning using backpropagation and naturally with Bayesian models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-31T14:36:33Z)
• Near-optimal inference in adaptive linear regression [60.08422051718195]
  Even simple methods like least squares can exhibit non-normal behavior when data is collected in an adaptive manner. We propose a family of online debiasing estimators to correct these distributional anomalies in at least squares estimation. We demonstrate the usefulness of our theory via applications to multi-armed bandit, autoregressive time series estimation, and active learning with exploration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-05T21:05:11Z)
• Imputation-Free Learning from Incomplete Observations [73.15386629370111]
  We introduce the importance of guided gradient descent (IGSGD) method to train inference from inputs containing missing values without imputation. We employ reinforcement learning (RL) to adjust the gradients used to train the models via back-propagation. Our imputation-free predictions outperform the traditional two-step imputation-based predictions using state-of-the-art imputation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-05T12:44:39Z)
• Scalable Marginal Likelihood Estimation for Model Selection in Deep Learning [78.83598532168256]
  Marginal-likelihood based model-selection is rarely used in deep learning due to estimation difficulties. Our work shows that marginal likelihoods can improve generalization and be useful when validation data is unavailable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-11T09:50:24Z)
• Individual dynamic prediction of clinical endpoint from large dimensional longitudinal biomarker history: a landmark approach [0.0]
  We propose a solution for the dynamic prediction of a health event that may exploit repeated measures of a possibly large number of markers. Our methodology, implemented in R, enables the prediction of an event using the entire longitudinal patient history, even when the number of repeated markers is large.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-02T12:36:18Z)
• Increasing the efficiency of randomized trial estimates via linear adjustment for a prognostic score [59.75318183140857]
  Estimating causal effects from randomized experiments is central to clinical research. Most methods for historical borrowing achieve reductions in variance by sacrificing strict type-I error rate control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-17T21:10:10Z)
• Calibration of Neural Networks using Splines [51.42640515410253]
  Measuring calibration error amounts to comparing two empirical distributions. We introduce a binning-free calibration measure inspired by the classical Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) statistical test. Our method consistently outperforms existing methods on KS error as well as other commonly used calibration measures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-23T07:18:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.