Do Concept Bottleneck Models Learn as Intended?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.04289v1
• Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 12:00:52 GMT
• Title: Do Concept Bottleneck Models Learn as Intended?
• Authors: Andrei Margeloiu, Matthew Ashman, Umang Bhatt, Yanzhi Chen, Mateja Jamnik, Adrian Weller
• Abstract summary: We find that concept bottleneck models struggle to meet interpretability, predictability, and intervenability goals. Using post hoc interpretability methods, we demonstrate that concepts do not correspond to anything semantically meaningful in input space.
• Score: 29.842609351878416
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Concept bottleneck models map from raw inputs to concepts, and then from concepts to targets. Such models aim to incorporate pre-specified, high-level concepts into the learning procedure, and have been motivated to meet three desiderata: interpretability, predictability, and intervenability. However, we find that concept bottleneck models struggle to meet these goals. Using post hoc interpretability methods, we demonstrate that concepts do not correspond to anything semantically meaningful in input space, thus calling into question the usefulness of concept bottleneck models in their current form.

Related papers

• Discover-then-Name: Task-Agnostic Concept Bottlenecks via Automated Concept Discovery [52.498055901649025]
  Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) have been proposed to address the 'black-box' problem of deep neural networks. We propose a novel CBM approach -- called Discover-then-Name-CBM (DN-CBM) -- that inverts the typical paradigm. Our concept extraction strategy is efficient, since it is agnostic to the downstream task, and uses concepts already known to the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-19T17:50:11Z)
• Concept Bottleneck Models Without Predefined Concepts [26.156636891713745]
  We introduce an input-dependent concept selection mechanism that ensures only a small subset of concepts is used across all classes. We show that our approach improves downstream performance and narrows the performance gap to black-box models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T13:34:50Z)
• Improving Intervention Efficacy via Concept Realignment in Concept Bottleneck Models [57.86303579812877]
  Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) ground image classification on human-understandable concepts to allow for interpretable model decisions. Existing approaches often require numerous human interventions per image to achieve strong performances. We introduce a trainable concept realignment intervention module, which leverages concept relations to realign concept assignments post-intervention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T17:59:01Z)
• An Axiomatic Approach to Model-Agnostic Concept Explanations [67.84000759813435]
  We propose an approach to concept explanations that satisfy three natural axioms: linearity, recursivity, and similarity. We then establish connections with previous concept explanation methods, offering insight into their varying semantic meanings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T20:53:35Z)
• Interpreting Pretrained Language Models via Concept Bottlenecks [55.47515772358389]
  Pretrained language models (PLMs) have made significant strides in various natural language processing tasks. The lack of interpretability due to their black-box'' nature poses challenges for responsible implementation. We propose a novel approach to interpreting PLMs by employing high-level, meaningful concepts that are easily understandable for humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-08T20:41:18Z)
• Coarse-to-Fine Concept Bottleneck Models [9.910980079138206]
  This work targets ante hoc interpretability, and specifically Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) Our goal is to design a framework that admits a highly interpretable decision making process with respect to human understandable concepts, on two levels of granularity. Within this framework, concept information does not solely rely on the similarity between the whole image and general unstructured concepts; instead, we introduce the notion of concept hierarchy to uncover and exploit more granular concept information residing in patch-specific regions of the image scene.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T14:57:31Z)
• Interpretable Neural-Symbolic Concept Reasoning [7.1904050674791185]
  Concept-based models aim to address this issue by learning tasks based on a set of human-understandable concepts. We propose the Deep Concept Reasoner (DCR), the first interpretable concept-based model that builds upon concept embeddings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-27T09:58:15Z)
• Concept Embedding Models [27.968589555078328]
  Concept bottleneck models promote trustworthiness by conditioning classification tasks on an intermediate level of human-like concepts. Existing concept bottleneck models are unable to find optimal compromises between high task accuracy, robust concept-based explanations, and effective interventions on concepts. We propose Concept Embedding Models, a novel family of concept bottleneck models which goes beyond the current accuracy-vs-interpretability trade-off by learning interpretable high-dimensional concept representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-19T14:49:36Z)
• Concept Gradient: Concept-based Interpretation Without Linear Assumption [77.96338722483226]
  Concept Activation Vector (CAV) relies on learning a linear relation between some latent representation of a given model and concepts. We proposed Concept Gradient (CG), extending concept-based interpretation beyond linear concept functions. We demonstrated CG outperforms CAV in both toy examples and real world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-31T17:06:46Z)
• ConceptDistil: Model-Agnostic Distillation of Concept Explanations [4.462334751640166]
  Concept-based explanations aims to fill the model interpretability gap for non-technical humans-in-the-loop. We propose ConceptDistil, a method to bring concept explanations to any black-box classifier using knowledge distillation. We validate ConceptDistil in a real world use-case, showing that it is able to optimize both tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-07T08:58:54Z)
• Interpretable Visual Reasoning via Induced Symbolic Space [75.95241948390472]
  We study the problem of concept induction in visual reasoning, i.e., identifying concepts and their hierarchical relationships from question-answer pairs associated with images. We first design a new framework named object-centric compositional attention model (OCCAM) to perform the visual reasoning task with object-level visual features. We then come up with a method to induce concepts of objects and relations using clues from the attention patterns between objects' visual features and question words.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-23T18:21:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.