Mundus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur: Visual Communication of Uncertainty in Election Polls

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.07811v1
• Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 07:02:24 GMT
• Title: Mundus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur: Visual Communication of Uncertainty in Election Polls
• Authors: Alexander Bauer, Andr\'e Klima, Jana Gau{\ss}, Hannah K\"umpel, Andreas Bender, Helmut K\"uchenhoff
• Abstract summary: We discuss potential sources of bias in nowcasting and forecasting. Concepts are presented to attenuate the issue of falsely perceived accuracy. One key idea is the use of Probabilities of Events instead of party shares.
• Score: 56.8172499765118
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Election poll reporting often focuses on mean values and only subordinately discusses the underlying uncertainty. Subsequent interpretations are too often phrased as certain. Moreover, media coverage rarely adequately takes into account the differences between now- and forecasts. These challenges were ubiquitous in the context of the 2016 and 2020 U.S. presidential elections, but are also present in multi-party systems like Germany. We discuss potential sources of bias in nowcasting and forecasting and review the current standards in the visual presentation of survey-based nowcasts. Concepts are presented to attenuate the issue of falsely perceived accuracy. We discuss multiple visual presentation techniques for central aspects in poll reporting. One key idea is the use of Probabilities of Events instead of party shares. The presented ideas offer modern and improved ways to communicate (changes in) the electoral mood for the general media.

Related papers

• Mapping the Media Landscape: Predicting Factual Reporting and Political Bias Through Web Interactions [0.7249731529275342]
  We propose an extension to a recently presented news media reliability estimation method. We assess the classification performance of four reinforcement learning strategies on a large news media hyperlink graph. Our experiments, targeting two challenging bias descriptors, factual reporting and political bias, showed a significant performance improvement at the source media level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T08:18:26Z)
• Understanding Divergent Framing of the Supreme Court Controversies: Social Media vs. News Outlets [56.67097829383139]
  We focus on the nuanced distinctions in framing of social media and traditional media outlets concerning a series of U.S. Supreme Court rulings. We observe significant polarization in the news media's treatment of affirmative action and abortion rights, whereas the topic of student loans tends to exhibit a greater degree of consensus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T06:40:21Z)
• Unveiling the Hidden Agenda: Biases in News Reporting and Consumption [59.55900146668931]
  We build a six-year dataset on the Italian vaccine debate and adopt a Bayesian latent space model to identify narrative and selection biases. We found a nonlinear relationship between biases and engagement, with higher engagement for extreme positions. Analysis of news consumption on Twitter reveals common audiences among news outlets with similar ideological positions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-14T18:58:42Z)
• NeuS: Neutral Multi-News Summarization for Mitigating Framing Bias [54.89737992911079]
  We propose a new task, a neutral summary generation from multiple news headlines of the varying political spectrum. One of the most interesting observations is that generation models can hallucinate not only factually inaccurate or unverifiable content, but also politically biased content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T07:06:01Z)
• Correcting public opinion trends through Bayesian data assimilation [8.406968279478347]
  Measuring public opinion is a key focus during democratic elections. Traditional survey polling remains the most popular estimation technique. Twitter opinion mining has attempted to combat these issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-29T11:39:56Z)
• Enabling News Consumers to View and Understand Biased News Coverage: A Study on the Perception and Visualization of Media Bias [7.092487352312782]
  We create three manually annotated datasets and test varying visualization strategies. Results show no strong effects of becoming aware of the bias of the treatment groups compared to the control group. Using a multilevel model, we find that perceived journalist bias is significantly related to perceived political extremeness and impartiality of the article.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-20T10:16:54Z)
• M2P2: Multimodal Persuasion Prediction using Adaptive Fusion [65.04045695380333]
  This paper solves two problems: the Debate Outcome Prediction (DOP) problem predicts who wins a debate and the Intensity of Persuasion Prediction (IPP) problem predicts the change in the number of votes before and after a speaker speaks. Our M2P2 framework is the first to use multimodal (acoustic, visual, language) data to solve the IPP problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-03T18:47:24Z)
• Electoral Forecasting Using a Novel Temporal Attenuation Model: Predicting the US Presidential Elections [91.3755431537592]
  We develop a novel macro-scale temporal attenuation (TA) model, which uses pre-election poll data to improve forecasting accuracy. Our hypothesis is that the timing of publicizing opinion polls plays a significant role in how opinion oscillates, especially right before elections. We present two different implementations of the TA model, which accumulate an average forecasting error of 2.8-3.28 points over the 48-year period.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-30T09:21:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.